How Israe;s' JUSTIFIABLE Attack on Iran Plays Out

[GHook93]

(1) Dempsey complicit comment and other items coming from the Dems is a smoke screen. Secretly the US has provided Israel with the bunker busting bombs she needed.

(2) Bibi will let the rhetoric die down and then attack Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities with extreme force.

(3) Iran's first response is to send their remaining missiles at Israel. Israel has advanced warning systems and a great missile defense shield, but a dozen or so get through. 200-300 people are killed. Israel easily absorbs the Iranian direct response. No air, naval or ground response is possible. Don't take my word read an article

Israel could attack Iran without causing a major war in the region | Thomas Rogan | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

(4) Hezbollah and Hamas both attack, but Iron Dome is highly effective. Israel smacks Hamas again like it did in Cast Lead and Lebanon and Israel fight another brief but bloody war. This time there do it under a war PM who cares more about winning and less about fighting with one hand behind its back. Yes they lose the PR battle, but win the war.

(5) Syria response: AAAASSSSad requires Irans backing and money. He attacks and opens pandora's box. Israel goes for an all out missile and air strike. Destroy a large chunk of its military bases, airforce and military itself. The rebels then take out what is left.

Iran never touches the US bases and Iran delivered a humiliating loss!

 

[Lipush]

There is a video on YouTube, titled "The Last Day".

Very disturbing.

 

[irosie91]

it seems logical to me that Israel will make a strike on Iran------doing so is certainly justfied since Iran comitted acts of war against Israel in 2006 In fact the presence of the Hezbollah militia in Lebanon and other neighbors of israel is in itself an ACT OF WAR. Of course the strike will be limited and designed to disable Irans nuclear program

 

[GHook93]

The Iranian Paper Dragon!!!

Blog: Thinking about an Israeli first strike on Iran

About Iranian retaliation:

First, Iran can fire no more than 200 missiles in retaliation to an Israeli attack. These missiles, the Shihab-3 and Sajil-2, carry a warhead only slightly larger than that of the familiar Scud, and are less accurate. Their destructive capability is limited to a building or two. Israel's time-tested radar systems will identify each Iranian missile's target before it hits and will fire an Arrow missile, like the Iron Dome, to intercept it, so that at least 80 percent of Iran's expensive, clumsy missiles won't even hit their targets. So how much truth is there behind the fear mongering?

Most sobering is his conclusion:

And what of the axis of evil to the north? Despite the thousands of rockets at its disposal, Hezbollah today is a shadow of its former self, while the Syrians are busy massacring each other. Israel has a proven military capability to leave Lebanon and Syria without infrastructure, power, water, bridges, command or control stations within the course of two hours, so where does this fear of an uncontrollable regional war come from?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The Iranian Paper Dragon!!!

Blog: Thinking about an Israeli first strike on Iran

About Iranian retaliation:

First, Iran can fire no more than 200 missiles in retaliation to an Israeli attack. These missiles, the Shihab-3 and Sajil-2, carry a warhead only slightly larger than that of the familiar Scud, and are less accurate. Their destructive capability is limited to a building or two. Israel's time-tested radar systems will identify each Iranian missile's target before it hits and will fire an Arrow missile, like the Iron Dome, to intercept it, so that at least 80 percent of Iran's expensive, clumsy missiles won't even hit their targets. So how much truth is there behind the fear mongering?

Most sobering is his conclusion:

And what of the axis of evil to the north? Despite the thousands of rockets at its disposal, Hezbollah today is a shadow of its former self, while the Syrians are busy massacring each other. Israel has a proven military capability to leave Lebanon and Syria without infrastructure, power, water, bridges, command or control stations within the course of two hours, so where does this fear of an uncontrollable regional war come from?

Direct Iranian retaliation against either Israel or US interests is unlikely to be too terrible, and a successful Israeli strike - major damage to Iran's nuclear weapons programs with few Israeli losses - is likely to be so disheartening to Iran's terror proxies that Hamas and Hezbollah will probably not be willing to invite a major Israeli retaliation against themselves. The rhetoric following the strike will be fearsome, but most countries, including most Arab countries, will be glad to see Iran's nuclear weapons program destroyed or even heavily damaged, especially if those governments don't have to pay a political price to get the job done.

A successful Israeli strike will be especially popular in the US Congress and among US voters. If the strike comes before November 2, the party that will suffer the most damage aside from Iran will be Obama.

 

[irosie91]

too much the Bolt article seems to me to be on the mark right now----HOWEVER!!!!! becoming complacent IS THE GREATEST DANGER

9-11-01 happened because we became complacent