How could Hitler kill millions of people?

those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it...

As usual your post is thick with irony. You often post as one who would like to rebuild the ovens, Adolph.
 
those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it...

As usual your post is thick with irony. You often post as one who would like to rebuild the ovens, Adolph.
why would anyone want such a thing..its beyond me but the reality is there they are those that would seek to impose tyranny..an armed populace is liberty's best defence
 
Is there a point here?

:dunno:
yes-.. Mao took the guns!! Fidel Castro took the guns Hugo Chavez took the guns ! :Boom2:

Sooo.... "taking guns" leads to world's fastest growing economy, world's best healthcare and world's cheapest gas?
ScratchHead.gif


Where does Hitler fit into all this?
 
world's fastest growing economy is china..do you want to live in china ?

No. Nor the other two but it's still not adding up.

Where's Hitler?

And where's any of these guys "taking the guns" in the first place?
Cryptic dood.
 
Is there a point here?

:dunno:
yes-.. Mao took the guns!! Fidel Castro took the guns Hugo Chavez took the guns ! :Boom2:

Sooo.... "taking guns" leads to world's fastest growing economy, world's best healthcare and world's cheapest gas?
ScratchHead.gif


Where does Hitler fit into all this?


Dafuck's that got to do with guns? Or Hitler?




"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is asine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.
 
But Hitler didn't ban guns. In this passage he's talking about occupied territory in wartime. Not his own citizenry. And it certainly has nothing to do with the Holocaust.

Neither did the others ban guns AFAIK.
 
But Hitler didn't ban guns. In this passage he's talking about occupied territory in wartime. Not his own citizenry. And it certainly has nothing to do with the Holocaust.

Neither did the others ban guns AFAIK.
Disarming Jews in Nazi Germany[edit]
On November 11, 1938, the Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons was promulgated by Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews living in those locations of the right to possess any form of weapons including truncheons, knives, or firearms and ammunition.[5] Some police forces used the pre-existing "trustworthiness" clause to disarm Jews on the basis "the Jewish population 'cannot be regarded as trustworthy'".[3]
Gun legislation in Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it...

As usual your post is thick with irony. You often post as one who would like to rebuild the ovens, Adolph.
why would anyone want such a thing..its beyond me but the reality is there they are those that would seek to impose tyranny..an armed populace is liberty's best defence

I think the mechanism by which various dictator and cult leaders managed their crimes over the eons is that they all tap into something within us all - the desire to kill and dominate. As primate predators, this urge is inside all of us. Most of us keep it chained in the sub-basement of our minds never to see the light of day. But given the opportunity to unleash it without consequence, some of us will. If you're a charasmatic figure who gets some power and offer this to would-be followers you can very successfully get a great deal of additional power.

As we see today with ISIS' recruiting success. For right or not, offer people the chance to enduldge their animal natures some will take you up on it. And en masse' that can be a very powerful force and symbol.
 
If a group of people declared war on my country I would not allow them guns either.
 
But Hitler didn't ban guns. In this passage he's talking about occupied territory in wartime. Not his own citizenry. And it certainly has nothing to do with the Holocaust.

Neither did the others ban guns AFAIK.
Disarming Jews in Nazi Germany[edit]
On November 11, 1938, the Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons was promulgated by Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews living in those locations of the right to possess any form of weapons including truncheons, knives, or firearms and ammunition.[5] Some police forces used the pre-existing "trustworthiness" clause to disarm Jews on the basis "the Jewish population 'cannot be regarded as trustworthy'".[3]
Gun legislation in Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Hitler's litany of liberty infringement against Jews is a long list, even without the work camps or slaughters.
But that's Jews -- not the whole populace. Guns weren't banned there either.

Have yet to see a point in this thread.
 
But Hitler didn't ban guns. In this passage he's talking about occupied territory in wartime. Not his own citizenry. And it certainly has nothing to do with the Holocaust.

Neither did the others ban guns AFAIK.
Disarming Jews in Nazi Germany[edit]
On November 11, 1938, the Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons was promulgated by Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews living in those locations of the right to possess any form of weapons including truncheons, knives, or firearms and ammunition.[5] Some police forces used the pre-existing "trustworthiness" clause to disarm Jews on the basis "the Jewish population 'cannot be regarded as trustworthy'".[3]
Gun legislation in Germany - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

for those who do not know--- The Nuremburg laws including the prohibition against jews owning weapons of any kind are nothing new-----they show up in the laws imposed by the disgusting pig---CONSTANTINE (Justinian law which morphed into canon law) and were aped by the meccaist dogs and are part and parcel of the stink of shariah. In the stench of shariah----the persons designated "dhimmi" which, in general are Christians and jews-----except when the meccist dogs conquer Hindus or others----and want to oppress and exploit using the same filth-------are completely disarmed. Disarming the victims is typical of the filth of oppression----nothing new-----Adolf did not invent it. He was a filth copy-cat
 
A despot who has total support from the media or has taken over the media can do what ever he wants. Lots of American and foreign documentaries have been done about capital punishment including secretly taken videos of electric chair executions and realistic renditions of other executions and they have been shown to the American public for their evaluation. Not a single documentary of "normal" abortions not to mention the horrific procedure known as "partial birth abortion" has ever been shown to the public while millions of full term babies have been stabbed in the back of the head and their brains sucked out with a Frankenstein device. Even the horror house of abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell has been dismissed. Why is that? The American media has taken sides in the abortion debate and they have determined that the less Americans know about the killing the better off they will be. When the Allies defeated Nazi Germany and the horrors of the death camps were revealed the German people were (or pretended to be) ignorant of the carnage because the Nazi regime insulated the German people from the uncomfortable details of institutionalized murder.
 

Forum List

Back
Top