How Could Anyone Deny Manmade Climate Change?

[gipper]

Whenever the State enforces an idea, like man-made global warming, you can bet it is a lie.

Sadly, many people get duped by the State even though the State has a long history of lying.

When the next administration claims that global warming is a hoax, do you think that will be a lie too?

Do you really think if Trump were to claim this, which I believe he has, that all in the administration and federal government will go along with it?

If so, you are very naive.

The radical left NEVER gives up.

 

[SSDD]

When the next administration claims that global warming is a hoax, do you think that will be a lie too?

No...the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supports that claim

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When the next administration claims that global warming is a hoax, do you think that will be a lie too?

No...the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supports that claim

Do you have evidence that we can't see the Sun?

 

[Wuwei]

Do you really think if Trump were to claim this, which I believe he has, that all in the administration and federal government will go along with it?

If so, you are very naive.

The radical left NEVER gives up.

Nope. What you are essentially saying is that if half the government says one thing and the other says the opposite, only one half is lying? Your previous statement was,

Whenever the State enforces an idea, like man-made global warming, you can bet it is a lie.
Sadly, many people get duped by the State even though the State has a long history of lying.
​

What you mean liberals lie and republicans don't? If so just say it that way rather than a blanket statement about the state. Otherwise it's meaningless ranting.

 

[SSDD]

Do you really think if Trump were to claim this, which I believe he has, that all in the administration and federal government will go along with it?

If so, you are very naive.

The radical left NEVER gives up.

Nope. What you are essentially saying is that if half the government says one thing and the other says the opposite, only one half is lying? Your previous statement was,

Whenever the State enforces an idea, like man-made global warming, you can bet it is a lie.
Sadly, many people get duped by the State even though the State has a long history of lying.
​

What you mean liberals lie and republicans don't? If so just say it that way rather than a blanket statement about the state. Otherwise it's meaningless ranting.

If you look at history...liberals tell the great big lie in an attempt to get as many people to believe in their scheme as possible, and therefore do the greatest damage with their lie...conservatives tend to tell the small lie for personal gain.

 

[gipper]

Do you really think if Trump were to claim this, which I believe he has, that all in the administration and federal government will go along with it?

If so, you are very naive.

The radical left NEVER gives up.

Nope. What you are essentially saying is that if half the government says one thing and the other says the opposite, only one half is lying? Your previous statement was,

Whenever the State enforces an idea, like man-made global warming, you can bet it is a lie.
Sadly, many people get duped by the State even though the State has a long history of lying.
​

What you mean liberals lie and republicans don't? If so just say it that way rather than a blanket statement about the state. Otherwise it's meaningless ranting.

Absurd.

I am not an R or a Con...dummy.

But one thing I am, is very much anti-State. As such, I can clearly see that AGW and the State are one. Why can't you see this obvious fact?

 

[Wyatt earp]

It is the climate at which the liberal opens his front door, sticks up the index finger(that is the one next to the thumb) and says, Global Warming, global warming, global warming, there I said it 3 times, so it must be true.

You are a clueless retard with your head up your ass, androgynoustwit.

Too bad you're far too stupid to have the mental capacity to recognize just how extremely stupid you are.

what someone who loses an argument says...........

Well, JustCrazy, you'd be the expert on that, since you are constantly losing every argument.......it must really suck to be as severely retarded as you obviously are.

what someone who loses an argument says....

What retards like JustCrazy say when they have no argument.

And still WINNING

And still WHINING, because the temperature of late has been WELL BELOW NORMAL... and the little cry baby cant get his way.

And you are a liar.

National Temperature and Precipitation Maps | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

Lol Old rocks Dont know it but he just posted a electoral map from the 2020 election..what a prophet.



.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Do you really think if Trump were to claim this, which I believe he has, that all in the administration and federal government will go along with it?

If so, you are very naive.

The radical left NEVER gives up.

Nope. What you are essentially saying is that if half the government says one thing and the other says the opposite, only one half is lying? Your previous statement was,

Whenever the State enforces an idea, like man-made global warming, you can bet it is a lie.
Sadly, many people get duped by the State even though the State has a long history of lying.
​

What you mean liberals lie and republicans don't? If so just say it that way rather than a blanket statement about the state. Otherwise it's meaningless ranting.

Notice how the wording was "What you mean liberals lie and republicans don't? ", yet the moron, doesn't realize that republicans have liberals in that party also. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and other far left liberals know that if they ran as Democrats they would be voted out in a NY minute, so run as Republicans , screw over America then go back to their states and Run on Lies about how well they did for their state. Yes dipshit Republicans lie, Democrats lie, but now it is time to DRAIN THE SWAMP..


If more people would watch this movie, it explains how the Democrats have been duping the stupid liberals over and over. Die Hard liberals hate this movie, but independents realize how crooked the Democrats really are.
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party (2016) - IMDb

Documentarian Dinesh D'Souza analyzes the history of the Democratic Party and what he thinks are Hillary Clinton's true motivations.

 

[Wuwei]

Absurd.

I am not an R or a Con...dummy.

But one thing I am, is very much anti-State. As such, I can clearly see that AGW and the State are one. Why can't you see this obvious fact?

It doesn't matter what you are. I still think it's hard to define exactly what the "state" is. Large bodies of the "state" want to raise taxes or lower taxes; reduce carbon fuels or allow an increase; defend abortion rights, eliminate abortion rights; more government restrictions or less ......

To be against the "state" to me is still ambiguous. And you obviously are against things that the state represents, so your blanket statement is ambiguous.

 

[gipper]

Absurd.

I am not an R or a Con...dummy.

But one thing I am, is very much anti-State. As such, I can clearly see that AGW and the State are one. Why can't you see this obvious fact?

It doesn't matter what you are. I still think it's hard to define exactly what the "state" is. Large bodies of the "state" want to raise taxes or lower taxes; reduce carbon fuels or allow an increase; defend abortion rights, eliminate abortion rights; more government restrictions or less ......

To be against the "state" to me is still ambiguous. And you are obviously are against things that the state represents, so your blanket statement is ambiguous.

I think you get my drift...no?

 

[Wuwei]

I think you get my drift...no?

Oh yes, I get your drift, but I mean you have an odd way of saying your "drift".

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Absurd.

I am not an R or a Con...dummy.

But one thing I am, is very much anti-State. As such, I can clearly see that AGW and the State are one. Why can't you see this obvious fact?

It doesn't matter what you are. I still think it's hard to define exactly what the "state" is. Large bodies of the "state" want to raise taxes or lower taxes; reduce carbon fuels or allow an increase; defend abortion rights, eliminate abortion rights; more government restrictions or less ......

To be against the "state" to me is still ambiguous. And you obviously are against things that the state represents, so your blanket statement is ambiguous.

The Road to Serfdom - Wikipedia

The Road to Serfdom (German: Der Weg zur Knechtschaft) is a book written between 1940 and 1943 by Austrian British economist and philosopher Friedrich von Hayek, in which he "[warns] of the danger of tyranny that inevitably results from government control of economic decision-making through central planning."[1] He further argues that the abandonment of individualism and classical liberalism inevitably leads to a loss of freedom, the creation of an oppressive society, the tyranny of a dictator, and the serfdom of the individual. Hayek challenged the general view among British academics that fascism (including National Socialism) was a capitalist reaction against socialism. He argued that fascism, National Socialism and socialism had common roots in central economic planning and empowering the state over the individual.

We have seen what the state has done to its people in the name of liberal compassion time and again. Those evil rich people living high on the hog, while some poor schlob over there cant make shit. So in comes the state to make FAIRNESS, they take from the rich, give some to the poor, and take whatever is left over to make the state very rich, while everyone else is now in poverty and misery. So you would rather have everyone equally poor and equally miserable, but those in power can be UBER RICH?

Hugo Chavez's ambassador daughter is Venezuela's richest woman | Daily Mail Online

Being the ex-President's daughter pays off: Hugo Chavez's ambassador daughter is Venezuela's richest woman

• Diario las Americas claims that Maria Gabriela Chavez, 35, has $4.2billion in assets held in American and Andorran banks
• Hugo Chavez famously declared 'being rich is bad' and during his lifetime railed against the wealthy for being lazy and gluttonous

It is idiots like you that allow countries like Venezuela to be destroyed by their leaders. We the People on the other hand said enough is enough, and we don't like liberalism. If you don't like it here now, then Cuba is open, leave your passport at the border, and live your Socialist Utopian Dream there. We don't want you here any more.

 

[Wuwei]

We have seen what the state has done to its people in the name of liberal compassion time and again. Those evil rich people living high on the hog, while some poor schlob over there cant make shit. So in comes the state to make FAIRNESS, they take from the rich, give some to the poor, and take whatever is left over to make the state very rich, while everyone else is now in poverty and misery. So you would rather have everyone equally poor and equally miserable, but those in power can be UBER RICH?

It is idiots like you that allow countries like Venezuela to be destroyed by their leaders. We the People on the other hand said enough is enough, and we don't like liberalism. If you don't like it here now, then Cuba is open, leave your passport at the border, and live your Socialist Utopian Dream there. We don't want you here any more.

I see you don't like our state, and a lot of other states too. Yeah, I wouldn't want to live in those other states either. And I don't like the direction our state is going either.

 

[Crick]

You state, Jim, that the state takes from the rich and gives to the poor, but then conclude that everyone is now in poverty and misery. There's a disconnect there. If the state gave money to the poor, they are no longer poor. And the last time I checked, 2.6 million more Americans voted for the liberal democrat Clinton than did for the dangerous idiot Trump. Thus your comment that "We the People... don't like liberalism" doesn't work either.

So, what does this have to do with denying AGW? Does it show that your loose enough with reality to believe we're not warming the planet?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You state, Jim, that the state takes from the rich and gives to the poor, but then conclude that everyone is now in poverty and misery. There's a disconnect there. If the state gave money to the poor, they are no longer poor. And the last time I checked, 2.6 million more Americans voted for the liberal democrat Clinton than did for the dangerous idiot Trump. Thus your comment that "We the People... don't like liberalism" doesn't work either.

So, what does this have to do with denying AGW? Does it show that your loose enough with reality to believe we're not warming the planet?

And the last time I checked, 2.6 million more Americans voted for the liberal democrat Clinton than did for the dangerous idiot Trump.

Not to mention a lot more illegal aliens.