How Conservatives Think

[blackhawk]

That's right, contrary to CON$erviNutzi propaganda, the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers. Liberals are more financially successful then the lazy CON$. But rather than work harder to achieve the same success as Liberals, CON$ simply declare themselves the achievers as they suck off the government teat, and their propaganda machine being so advanced CON$ believe that they ARE the achievers in spite of their poverty.

So while CON$ are the poorest of the poor who pay no income taxes, they have convinced themselves they are the richest of the rich and paying most of the income taxes.

So then if you are correct then the 1% that ows and Obama and the rest of the Democrats constantly bitch about are in fact the liberal Democrats not the conservative Republicans I can't wait to see you guy's start protesting against yourself.

The 1% OWS rails against own BOTH Parties and pay no income taxes. They are the capital gains tycoons. The people I'm talking about are the wage earners who are taxed the most and who BOTH Parties lead you to believe are the 1%.

Even your MessiahRushie acknowledges that there are two kinds of "rich" people.

August 7, 2007
CALLER: And, you know, and the way our tax system works, we have an overly complex system, which in and of itself is a problem, but the way our tax system works and the way the tax laws are written, it's based on a few kind of like hinge numbers like adjusted gross income and taxable income, and while the soak the rich -- or however you choose to describe it -- really doesn't come down that way. It really comes down to much lower income levels.

RUSH: It does, exactly, and here's the dirty little secret if you ever to pull it off. It's hard. This is why most people don't understand the tax-the-rich business. You've got to structure your life so you have no "earned" income. I'm out of time. I'll explain that. There's a category called earned income versus other kinds of income. Earned income is what the income tax rate is on. That's how "the rich" do it. They don't have "earned" income.
END TRANSCRIPT

The Truth About Taxes
August 6, 2007
RUSH: I've told you before: the income tax is designed to keep people like his [Buffett's] secretary from becoming wealthy! There is no "wealth" tax. So this is a big misnomer. ...
But there's no tax on wealth. There is a tax on income, and the tax on income is designed to keep everybody who is not wealthy from getting there.

I'm talking about genuine wealth, not the way Democrats define "rich."

Why do you assume I listen to Rush or political talk radio? This seems to be a nice example of a liberal thinking they know everything that someone who's politics lean right does.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

Correct, it’s the Orwellian nature of conservatism: ‘freedom through repression.’

 

[ecinicola]

Having studied psychology, how a person thinks doesn't have a label on it such as consevative of liberal. It is the "mind" that controlls every behavior you have, and you can't call it republican or democrat. It is the person, the mind and what a person puts in their mind that makes them lean with one party or the other. It also is a point of whether the mind can recognize right from wrong and know the difference. But the mind of a person is the most powerful thing you have, and what you put in it is what you will believe, unless you are able to recognize truth from fiction.
Con artist are quite good at twisting a persons mind and thoughts, because the person can't recognize what the con artist is actually doing. Communism also is a form of con artist tactic's. Half of what you hear today is something you should not believe and be able to spot what someone is telling you as fact or fiction. There is a purpose for the con artist twisting your thoughts and conviencing you of something not true.....and they do this for their own gains.
It has been a study on this and has been found that liberals are more prone to be the con artist, but there are conservatives the same.... At any rate, being able to recoginize truth from fiction or what a person is trying to convience you of is important. You don't have to put a label on it. Its the person and their mind.

 

[Peach]

Having studied psychology, how a person thinks doesn't have a label on it such as consevative of liberal. It is the "mind" that controlls every behavior you have, and you can't call it republican or democrat. It is the person, the mind and what a person puts in their mind that makes them lean with one party or the other. It also is a point of whether the mind can recognize right from wrong and know the difference. But the mind of a person is the most powerful thing you have, and what you put in it is what you will believe, unless you are able to recognize truth from fiction.
Con artist are quite good at twisting a persons mind and thoughts, because the person can't recognize what the con artist is actually doing. Communism also is a form of con artist tactic's. Half of what you hear today is something you should not believe and be able to spot what someone is telling you as fact or fiction. There is a purpose for the con artist twisting your thoughts and conviencing you of something not true.....and they do this for their own gains.
It has been a study on this and has been found that liberals are more prone to be the con artist, but there are conservatives the same.... At any rate, being able to recoginize truth from fiction or what a person is trying to convience you of is important. You don't have to put a label on it. Its the person and their mind.

Agreed; no labels on individuals' thoughts.

 

[inALIENable]

Correct, it’s the Orwellian nature of conservatism: ‘freedom through repression.’

If you think ‘equality through repression’ is any better, go live in north korea, they are already commie.

 

[buckeye45_73]

From what I have seen liberals or at least a certain segment of them are all for fairness and equality as long as they can get someone else to pay for it usually those rich evil Republicans. Margaret Thatcher said it best the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

There's the rich and then there's the Republicans. While the rich lead the Republican Party, except for "let him die" and other such cruelty, I don't believe they really have much in common. For one, the Rich don't believe education is for snobs.

explain the Kennedys, Corzine, and and I can list tons of other rich democrats that screw the little people.

Report: 237 millionaires in Congress - Erika Lovley - POLITICO.com


I like this part: I see ALOT of democrats and I bet they dont pay the most that they could possibly pay in taxes. Heck Kerry is so cheap he wont pay taxes on his boat.

P says California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa is the richest lawmaker on Capitol Hill, with a net worth estimated at about $251 million. Next in line: Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), worth about $244.7 million; Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), worth about $214.5 million; Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), worth about $209.7 million; and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), worth about $208.8 million.

Super rich tend to be democrats, maybe they have more abortions and drugs? Or is it that democrats are just more greedy, keeping all that money to themselves?

 

[daveman]

[
One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

You mean like:

- Forcing citizens to buy into a contract with private companies?
- Banning salt, fat, happy meals, guns?
- Forcing people to pay for public schools even if they dont have kids or kids dont attend?
- Green taxes, on gas, carbon, electricity, water?
- Banning profanity (See: California towns)
- Banning singing (See: Sullivan's Island, SC, 2010)

I could go on and on. Oh, my bad, those are left wing policies they passed.

That's different Those are for your own good. And liberals have the authority to decide what's best for you

Just ask them.

 

[daveman]

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

Correct, it’s the Orwellian nature of conservatism: ‘freedom through repression.’

That's amusing. 1984 was a warning against unchecked government power. You know -- leftism.

 

[California Girl]

That's right, contrary to CON$erviNutzi propaganda, the Libs are the achievers and the CON$ are the slackers. Liberals are more financially successful then the lazy CON$. But rather than work harder to achieve the same success as Liberals, CON$ simply declare themselves the achievers as they suck off the government teat, and their propaganda machine being so advanced CON$ believe that they ARE the achievers in spite of their poverty.

So while CON$ are the poorest of the poor who pay no income taxes, they have convinced themselves they are the richest of the rich and paying most of the income taxes.

So then if you are correct then the 1% that ows and Obama and the rest of the Democrats constantly bitch about are in fact the liberal Democrats not the conservative Republicans I can't wait to see you guy's start protesting against yourself.

The 1% OWS rails against own BOTH Parties and pay no income taxes. They are the capital gains tycoons. The people I'm talking about are the wage earners who are taxed the most and who BOTH Parties lead you to believe are the 1%.

Even your MessiahRushie acknowledges that there are two kinds of "rich" people.

August 7, 2007
CALLER: And, you know, and the way our tax system works, we have an overly complex system, which in and of itself is a problem, but the way our tax system works and the way the tax laws are written, it's based on a few kind of like hinge numbers like adjusted gross income and taxable income, and while the soak the rich -- or however you choose to describe it -- really doesn't come down that way. It really comes down to much lower income levels.

RUSH: It does, exactly, and here's the dirty little secret if you ever to pull it off. It's hard. This is why most people don't understand the tax-the-rich business. You've got to structure your life so you have no "earned" income. I'm out of time. I'll explain that. There's a category called earned income versus other kinds of income. Earned income is what the income tax rate is on. That's how "the rich" do it. They don't have "earned" income.
END TRANSCRIPT

The Truth About Taxes
August 6, 2007
RUSH: I've told you before: the income tax is designed to keep people like his [Buffett's] secretary from becoming wealthy! There is no "wealth" tax. So this is a big misnomer. ...
But there's no tax on wealth. There is a tax on income, and the tax on income is designed to keep everybody who is not wealthy from getting there.

I'm talking about genuine wealth, not the way Democrats define "rich."

Are you obsessed with Rush? You seem to pay a lot of attention to his every word. Must be very hard for you.... Maybe therapy would help. It might help you distinguish between fact and the fiction you present as fact.

 

[California Girl]

So then if you are correct then the 1% that ows and Obama and the rest of the Democrats constantly bitch about are in fact the liberal Democrats not the conservative Republicans I can't wait to see you guy's start protesting against yourself.

The 1% OWS rails against own BOTH Parties and pay no income taxes. They are the capital gains tycoons. The people I'm talking about are the wage earners who are taxed the most and who BOTH Parties lead you to believe are the 1%.

Even your MessiahRushie acknowledges that there are two kinds of "rich" people.

August 7, 2007
CALLER: And, you know, and the way our tax system works, we have an overly complex system, which in and of itself is a problem, but the way our tax system works and the way the tax laws are written, it's based on a few kind of like hinge numbers like adjusted gross income and taxable income, and while the soak the rich -- or however you choose to describe it -- really doesn't come down that way. It really comes down to much lower income levels.

RUSH: It does, exactly, and here's the dirty little secret if you ever to pull it off. It's hard. This is why most people don't understand the tax-the-rich business. You've got to structure your life so you have no "earned" income. I'm out of time. I'll explain that. There's a category called earned income versus other kinds of income. Earned income is what the income tax rate is on. That's how "the rich" do it. They don't have "earned" income.
END TRANSCRIPT

The Truth About Taxes
August 6, 2007
RUSH: I've told you before: the income tax is designed to keep people like his [Buffett's] secretary from becoming wealthy! There is no "wealth" tax. So this is a big misnomer. ...
But there's no tax on wealth. There is a tax on income, and the tax on income is designed to keep everybody who is not wealthy from getting there.

I'm talking about genuine wealth, not the way Democrats define "rich."

Why do you assume I listen to Rush or political talk radio? This seems to be a nice example of a liberal thinking they know everything that someone who's politics lean right does.

EdTheDumbAss is obsessed with Rush. Seriously.... if he was ever rational, he sure as hell isn't now.

 

[Peach]

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

Correct, it’s the Orwellian nature of conservatism: ‘freedom through repression.’

That's amusing. 1984 was a warning against unchecked government power. You know -- leftism.

I believe Orwell stated 1984 was a warning against both Communist AND Fascist governments. Two sides of the same coin, I know.

 

[edthecynic]

So then if you are correct then the 1% that ows and Obama and the rest of the Democrats constantly bitch about are in fact the liberal Democrats not the conservative Republicans I can't wait to see you guy's start protesting against yourself.

The 1% OWS rails against own BOTH Parties and pay no income taxes. They are the capital gains tycoons. The people I'm talking about are the wage earners who are taxed the most and who BOTH Parties lead you to believe are the 1%.

Even your MessiahRushie acknowledges that there are two kinds of "rich" people.

August 7, 2007
CALLER: And, you know, and the way our tax system works, we have an overly complex system, which in and of itself is a problem, but the way our tax system works and the way the tax laws are written, it's based on a few kind of like hinge numbers like adjusted gross income and taxable income, and while the soak the rich -- or however you choose to describe it -- really doesn't come down that way. It really comes down to much lower income levels.

RUSH: It does, exactly, and here's the dirty little secret if you ever to pull it off. It's hard. This is why most people don't understand the tax-the-rich business. You've got to structure your life so you have no "earned" income. I'm out of time. I'll explain that. There's a category called earned income versus other kinds of income. Earned income is what the income tax rate is on. That's how "the rich" do it. They don't have "earned" income.
END TRANSCRIPT

The Truth About Taxes
August 6, 2007
RUSH: I've told you before: the income tax is designed to keep people like his [Buffett's] secretary from becoming wealthy! There is no "wealth" tax. So this is a big misnomer. ...
But there's no tax on wealth. There is a tax on income, and the tax on income is designed to keep everybody who is not wealthy from getting there.

I'm talking about genuine wealth, not the way Democrats define "rich."

Why do you assume I listen to Rush or political talk radio? This seems to be a nice example of a liberal thinking they know everything that someone who's politics lean right does.

The DittoNutzis on this board have only started denying listening to their MessiahRushie since I've made them eat his words.

 

[Peach]

How Conservatives Think

Really good video. Hit's the nail on the head.

Less of an attack on conservatives, more of a description of their tactics.

The comments below the video are very good.

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

Once again, how do you know how each and every person who disagrees with you thinks; much less, all think alike?

 

[edthecynic]

So then if you are correct then the 1% that ows and Obama and the rest of the Democrats constantly bitch about are in fact the liberal Democrats not the conservative Republicans I can't wait to see you guy's start protesting against yourself.

The 1% OWS rails against own BOTH Parties and pay no income taxes. They are the capital gains tycoons. The people I'm talking about are the wage earners who are taxed the most and who BOTH Parties lead you to believe are the 1%.

Even your MessiahRushie acknowledges that there are two kinds of "rich" people.

August 7, 2007
CALLER: And, you know, and the way our tax system works, we have an overly complex system, which in and of itself is a problem, but the way our tax system works and the way the tax laws are written, it's based on a few kind of like hinge numbers like adjusted gross income and taxable income, and while the soak the rich -- or however you choose to describe it -- really doesn't come down that way. It really comes down to much lower income levels.

RUSH: It does, exactly, and here's the dirty little secret if you ever to pull it off. It's hard. This is why most people don't understand the tax-the-rich business. You've got to structure your life so you have no "earned" income. I'm out of time. I'll explain that. There's a category called earned income versus other kinds of income. Earned income is what the income tax rate is on. That's how "the rich" do it. They don't have "earned" income.
END TRANSCRIPT

The Truth About Taxes
August 6, 2007
RUSH: I've told you before: the income tax is designed to keep people like his [Buffett's] secretary from becoming wealthy! There is no "wealth" tax. So this is a big misnomer. ...
But there's no tax on wealth. There is a tax on income, and the tax on income is designed to keep everybody who is not wealthy from getting there.

I'm talking about genuine wealth, not the way Democrats define "rich."

Are you obsessed with Rush? You seem to pay a lot of attention to his every word. Must be very hard for you.... Maybe therapy would help. It might help you distinguish between fact and the fiction you present as fact.

I notice from your personal attack and your spiteful neg rep that you failed to rebut any of the "fiction" you say I posted. Obviously you know you can't and therefore only spite remains to console you.
Thank you!

 

[rdean]

Liberals always say Fairness and Equality.

Where is the fairness in our newspapers and media, when they hire the majority of Liberals over Conservatives?
Liberals dominate Hollywood and made Conservatives shut up their Conservative beliefs or they would not be able to get a job. Real fair and equal NOT !
Liberals run our schools and Universities. The Liberals will not allow Conservative speech or speakers on campus. Where is fairness and equality on Campus?
Liberals in this Nation is around 20% but they run and dominate News, Schools, University's, Science,Judicial and Washington D.C.

Wow. Really good examples of what I wrote.

Bet you cannot prove this horse puckey.

News Media;

View attachment 18214

Media Bias Basics

This is a big yawn and a so what.

Corporations give to Republicans over Democrats.

But the people who work there, janitors, secretaries, and so on give to Democrats over Republicans.

Try to figure out why.

 

[rdean]

From what I have seen liberals or at least a certain segment of them are all for fairness and equality as long as they can get someone else to pay for it usually those rich evil Republicans. Margaret Thatcher said it best the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

The connection between socialism and Liberals is one of the very few Republican inventions. They got that one wrong, just like everything they attempt to "reason out".

 

[rdean]

From what I have seen liberals or at least a certain segment of them are all for fairness and equality as long as they can get someone else to pay for it usually those rich evil Republicans. Margaret Thatcher said it best the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

There's the rich and then there's the Republicans. While the rich lead the Republican Party, except for "let him die" and other such cruelty, I don't believe they really have much in common. For one, the Rich don't believe education is for snobs.

You have a grand talent for making broad generalizations about groups which tends to give a very good view of how you think. By the way despite what many like to claim the rich lead the Democratic party as well.

Of course, the Democratic Party is a coalition. It even has conservatives called Blue Dogs. How many liberals does the Republican Party have?

 

[rdean]

How Conservatives Think

Really good video. Hit's the nail on the head.

Less of an attack on conservatives, more of a description of their tactics.

The comments below the video are very good.

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

It's always amusing when people who are incapable of thinking dictate how others think.

Is that finally an admission?

 

[rdean]

[
One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

You mean like:

- Forcing citizens to buy into a contract with private companies?
- Banning salt, fat, happy meals, guns?
- Forcing people to pay for public schools even if they dont have kids or kids dont attend?
- Green taxes, on gas, carbon, electricity, water?
- Banning profanity (See: California towns)
- Banning singing (See: Sullivan's Island, SC, 2010)

I could go on and on. Oh, my bad, those are left wing policies they passed.

If you don't like this country, move the fuck out. I want children to go to school. I gladly pay. It's part of what keeps this country great, despite all Republican efforts to the contrary.

 

[rdean]

One thing conservatives are very, very good at is selling the idea that their repressive and restrictive policies make you more "free".

Correct, it’s the Orwellian nature of conservatism: ‘freedom through repression.’

And if they aren't able to repress, they insist it's their rights that are being violated.