How come its majority of white people that protest illegal immigration

i welcome anyone that want come over and make something of themselves

the conservatives are scared mexicans are gonna take over

Point out the "mexicans" that are going to "make something of themselves", oh and while you are at it, point out the "mexican" that are carrying highly contagious diseases or parasites that are not common in this country (yet), oh, and point out the "mexicans" that drive drunk and hurt or kill people or don't have insurance, oh, oh, and point out the "mexicans" that are truly evil and are here to rape, murder, pillage the law-abiding citizen.

I will be waiting for you to get back to me on that, and while you are at it, point out the same for illegal orientals, europeans, south americans, africans (white or black), or from anywhere else in the world. How do you expect to control "health costs" when you allow diseases and parasites to spread, freely? How do you expect to keep citizens safe, when you ignore criminals? Who do you think pays for all those "gov't handouts" given to illegals (in the form of education, health care or other)?

Native Americans had less immunity to European disease also. MEXICO is one country with which we do have documentation proving US claims to land.

Call a whambulance and submit to History.

Good lord.:cuckoo:
 
And Whom is talking about Europe?

That's right...you are.

T, the first white people in this land were ILLEGAL immigrants.

There were laws dealing with immigration to this continent back then?

Peach wants us to believe we're all illegit here.

She want's to be a champion for the oppressed when in fact the oppressed at one time were the oppressors. That's what happens when you lose wars.

She doesn't realize that this country is one of the most fair and the rights of the people here are better than just about anywhere.

Because we have so many freedoms she's able to bitch and moan about how we've been so evil when we've actually been quite good in comparison to those she admires. Communism seems like a great deal when they ushered it in down in Cuba. Now folks risk their lives in boats to escape it.
 
Last edited:
blacks could care less
mexicans dont protest
asians dont protest

white people continue to protest about it. its funny how they are scared mexicans are gonna be the majority hahah.

I can't answer that, but I would gather it has to do with the fact that the white people are the ones with most of the money in this country and hence having to subsidize people who come here illegally. That aside, we have laws for a reason. If we are going to start picking and choosing which ones we want to follow or enforce why have them at all?

how come we did not have these laws when whites came to ellis island


Just how fucking stupid are you?
 
The thing is, Turks did bad things to Anatolian Greeks to get what’s now Turkey, and Japanese did bad things to the Ainu to get what’s now Japan. No one says Turks or Japanese, or any non-White doesn’t deserve a country for past bad acts. Whites are called “raaacisss” for past bad acts and told they don’t deserve a country.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

youtube.com/watch?v=tacvR87FzBU
 
T, the first white people in this land were ILLEGAL immigrants.

There were laws dealing with immigration to this continent back then?

Peach wants us to believe we're all illegit here.

She want's to be a champion for the oppressed when in fact the oppressed at one time were the oppressors. That's what happens when you lose wars.

She doesn't realize that this country is one of the most fair and the rights of the people here are better than just about anywhere.

Because we have so many freedoms she's able to bitch and moan about how we've been so evil when we've actually been quite good in comparison to those she admires. Communism seems like a great deal when they ushered it in down in Cuba. Now folks risk their lives in boats to escape it.
And she fully expects us to have pity for the illegals here now and look the other way as we have LAWS to stem the tide these days...

Maybe we should just give it back?
 
T, the first white people in this land were ILLEGAL immigrants.

There were laws dealing with immigration back then?

No there wasn't...and THE point.
icon14.gif

You are unreal! Some tribes welcomed settlers until they encroached upon land owned by the tribes. Laws do not have to be in bound volumes to be laws T.
 
There were laws dealing with immigration back then?

No there wasn't...and THE point.
icon14.gif

You are unreal! Some tribes welcomed settlers until they encroached upon land owned by the tribes. Laws do not have to be in bound volumes to be laws T.
You wanna change history? *BE* My guest. Maybe Revise it?

Is what it is. DEAL with it and move on. Founders gave ALL the gift of Liberty...Think Statists wish to preserve Liberty?

YOU need to rethink a bit and live in the NOW and realize what is to be lost if the elites in the District Of Criminals should prevail?

You argument, much less MINE would be rendered moot.
 
There were laws dealing with immigration back then?

No there wasn't...and THE point.
icon14.gif

You are unreal! Some tribes welcomed settlers until they encroached upon land owned by the tribes. Laws do not have to be in bound volumes to be laws T.

According to what I read somewhere (and no I'm not going to try to find it) Some of the tribes had a hard time understanding how anyone could own land.
 
how come we did not have these laws when whites came to ellis island




There were a great many laws and regulations in place when people where coming through Ellis Island. They were enforced, and many of them would turn your lefty hair white.
 
how come we did not have these laws when whites came to ellis island




There were a great many laws and regulations in place when people where coming through Ellis Island. They were enforced, and many of them would turn your lefty hair white.

They turned down a great many...Political Correctness as we are subject to now didn't exist.
 
T, the first white people in this land were ILLEGAL immigrants.

So what do we do? Give it back?

:eusa_think::eusa_naughty::eusa_doh:

Give us a break, will you?

No, acknowledge we are almost all immigrants. As the nation now has immigration laws, punish those who profit from the labor of illegal immigrants along with the immigrants.

As citizens we have a right to pass laws to control our borders. We can't allow it to be one way, nobody allowed to enter their countries yet we have to allow a sieve into ours. We can't control the flow of goods and currency that way nor can we establish security.

I suppose you just want everyone in the world to suck us dry and move on.
 
NOT SO "Taz":

In the American colonies, the gap between the rich and poor was smaller than in England, and America’s poverty was not as harsh as England’s. General Washington initially discouraged servants and slaves from joining the army, but as the war stretched on, he recruited servants and slaves into the army, promising them their freedom in return for their service.

While the most famous of these disturbances were Shay’s Rebellion (1786-1787) and the Whiskey Rebellion (1794), armed conflict by small landholders, rebelling against elitist fiscal policies and unfair taxes, grew to be a common feature in the years immediately following the Revolution.

Poverty was a constant threat to a preponderance of colonial residents. Poor harvests, Indian wars, sickness and other difficulties were all too familiar trials that could plunge colonial residents into indigence. Consequently, the American attitudes concerning poverty were more benign than in England. Most early settlements had adopted the major elements of the English outdoor relief programs. The primary concern of these early efforts was directed to the plight of widows and orphans who were boarded out to neighbors, or in the case of older boys, put into apprenticeships. Relatives were given primary responsibility for their poor relations. Local relief programs were administered by town officials and paid for by local taxes.

Early American poor laws had some qualities that were unique. There was a strong inclination to keep the church and state separate. Local administration of indigent programs fell to the town or city rather than the parish. Self-help organizations and charities played a larger role in early America than in Europe. The private charities offered employment assistance, burial funds, and direct relief for widows and orphans. The first and most famous of these was the Scot’s Charitable Association, but similar ethnically based relief programs were common resources in the emerging cities. Local reliance on private charity to assist in the caring for the poor was a hallmark of early American relief policy.


Thanks for that chunk of plagiarism.
 
NOT SO "Taz":

In the American colonies, the gap between the rich and poor was smaller than in England, and America’s poverty was not as harsh as England’s. General Washington initially discouraged servants and slaves from joining the army, but as the war stretched on, he recruited servants and slaves into the army, promising them their freedom in return for their service.

While the most famous of these disturbances were Shay’s Rebellion (1786-1787) and the Whiskey Rebellion (1794), armed conflict by small landholders, rebelling against elitist fiscal policies and unfair taxes, grew to be a common feature in the years immediately following the Revolution.

Poverty was a constant threat to a preponderance of colonial residents. Poor harvests, Indian wars, sickness and other difficulties were all too familiar trials that could plunge colonial residents into indigence. Consequently, the American attitudes concerning poverty were more benign than in England. Most early settlements had adopted the major elements of the English outdoor relief programs. The primary concern of these early efforts was directed to the plight of widows and orphans who were boarded out to neighbors, or in the case of older boys, put into apprenticeships. Relatives were given primary responsibility for their poor relations. Local relief programs were administered by town officials and paid for by local taxes.

Early American poor laws had some qualities that were unique. There was a strong inclination to keep the church and state separate. Local administration of indigent programs fell to the town or city rather than the parish. Self-help organizations and charities played a larger role in early America than in Europe. The private charities offered employment assistance, burial funds, and direct relief for widows and orphans. The first and most famous of these was the Scot’s Charitable Association, but similar ethnically based relief programs were common resources in the emerging cities. Local reliance on private charity to assist in the caring for the poor was a hallmark of early American relief policy.

While these are all interesting factoids of history, most of which I already knew, how is this at all relevant to the discussion?

Your post about poor people "starving" in early America. And T's anti immigration fury. Causcasians are IMMIGRANTS to this land.


It would help if you understood the terms being used.
 
I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........

Pride in being an American is for dip-shits.......


.....according to the left.

Pretending the nation was not already populated with self governing societies of humans is the "Columbus discovered" ignorance of some also.



Pretending the 'what' was not already populated? What was that word you used?
 

Forum List

Back
Top