- Moderator
- #41
all i want is one video of hundreds of blacks or mexicans protesting immigration
Are there videos of anyone protesting immigration? I didnt know anyone was against it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
all i want is one video of hundreds of blacks or mexicans protesting immigration
I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........
And belief in Rule of law?
How many in your family are illegal aliens?
zero, my ancestors came from africa they were taken by white people
they were herded up by black people, taken to the wharf,, and then they were taken by white people.. dumbass.
blacks could care less
mexicans dont protest
asians dont protest
white people continue to protest about it. its funny how they are scared mexicans are gonna be the majority hahah.
And Whom is talking about Europe?I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........
And belief in Rule of law?
Europeans were NOT the first humans on the land that BECAME this country, "T"; there were laws BEFORE European laws came into effect.
zero, my ancestors came from africa they were taken by white people
they were herded up by black people, taken to the wharf,, and then they were taken by white people.. dumbass.
Is that your justification?
I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........
And belief in Rule of law?
Europeans were NOT the first humans on the land that BECAME this country
NOT SO "Taz":
In the American colonies, the gap between the rich and poor was smaller than in England, and America’s poverty was not as harsh as England’s. General Washington initially discouraged servants and slaves from joining the army, but as the war stretched on, he recruited servants and slaves into the army, promising them their freedom in return for their service.
While the most famous of these disturbances were Shay’s Rebellion (1786-1787) and the Whiskey Rebellion (1794), armed conflict by small landholders, rebelling against elitist fiscal policies and unfair taxes, grew to be a common feature in the years immediately following the Revolution.
Poverty was a constant threat to a preponderance of colonial residents. Poor harvests, Indian wars, sickness and other difficulties were all too familiar trials that could plunge colonial residents into indigence. Consequently, the American attitudes concerning poverty were more benign than in England. Most early settlements had adopted the major elements of the English outdoor relief programs. The primary concern of these early efforts was directed to the plight of widows and orphans who were boarded out to neighbors, or in the case of older boys, put into apprenticeships. Relatives were given primary responsibility for their poor relations. Local relief programs were administered by town officials and paid for by local taxes.
Early American poor laws had some qualities that were unique. There was a strong inclination to keep the church and state separate. Local administration of indigent programs fell to the town or city rather than the parish. Self-help organizations and charities played a larger role in early America than in Europe. The private charities offered employment assistance, burial funds, and direct relief for widows and orphans. The first and most famous of these was the Scot’s Charitable Association, but similar ethnically based relief programs were common resources in the emerging cities. Local reliance on private charity to assist in the caring for the poor was a hallmark of early American relief policy.
And belief in Rule of law?
Europeans were NOT the first humans on the land that BECAME this country
Who said they were?
i welcome anyone that want come over and make something of themselves
NOT SO "Taz":
In the American colonies, the gap between the rich and poor was smaller than in England, and Americas poverty was not as harsh as Englands. General Washington initially discouraged servants and slaves from joining the army, but as the war stretched on, he recruited servants and slaves into the army, promising them their freedom in return for their service.
While the most famous of these disturbances were Shays Rebellion (1786-1787) and the Whiskey Rebellion (1794), armed conflict by small landholders, rebelling against elitist fiscal policies and unfair taxes, grew to be a common feature in the years immediately following the Revolution.
Poverty was a constant threat to a preponderance of colonial residents. Poor harvests, Indian wars, sickness and other difficulties were all too familiar trials that could plunge colonial residents into indigence. Consequently, the American attitudes concerning poverty were more benign than in England. Most early settlements had adopted the major elements of the English outdoor relief programs. The primary concern of these early efforts was directed to the plight of widows and orphans who were boarded out to neighbors, or in the case of older boys, put into apprenticeships. Relatives were given primary responsibility for their poor relations. Local relief programs were administered by town officials and paid for by local taxes.
Early American poor laws had some qualities that were unique. There was a strong inclination to keep the church and state separate. Local administration of indigent programs fell to the town or city rather than the parish. Self-help organizations and charities played a larger role in early America than in Europe. The private charities offered employment assistance, burial funds, and direct relief for widows and orphans. The first and most famous of these was the Scots Charitable Association, but similar ethnically based relief programs were common resources in the emerging cities. Local reliance on private charity to assist in the caring for the poor was a hallmark of early American relief policy.
While these are all interesting factoids of history, most of which I already knew, how is this at all relevant to the discussion?
CLASSIC! How about NATIVE Americans gunsideaug?
how about them?
Let immigration be decided by Native Americans, for a change.
And belief in Rule of law?
Europeans were NOT the first humans on the land that BECAME this country
Who said they were?
Because illegal is illegal, period, racist.blacks could care less
mexicans dont protest
asians dont protest
white people continue to protest about it. its funny how they are scared mexicans are gonna be the majority hahah.
And Whom is talking about Europe?And belief in Rule of law?
Europeans were NOT the first humans on the land that BECAME this country, "T"; there were laws BEFORE European laws came into effect.
That's right...you are.
blacks could care less
mexicans dont protest
asians dont protest
white people continue to protest about it. its funny how they are scared mexicans are gonna be the majority hahah.
I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........
The left are dipshits.I didn't know that being anti-illegal had anything to do with race. I thought it was pride in being an American.........
Pride in being an American is for dip-shits.......
.....according to the left.
i welcome anyone that want come over and make something of themselves
the conservatives are scared mexicans are gonna take over