How cold is cold?

[dilloduck]

Scientists have now concluded and are reporting that

weather is not stagnant!

And in an important related discovery, scientist in East Anglia have concluded that global climate has always changed.

And that dies not proove that man is not currnetly having an impact on that change now does it?

and it doesn't proove that IF man is having some slight impact of the weather that it's a bad thing thing

 

[Liability]

Scientists have now concluded and are reporting that

weather is not stagnant!

And in an important related discovery, scientist in East Anglia have concluded that global climate has always changed.

And that dies not proove that man is not currnetly having an impact on that change now does it?

It dies not proove anything about mankind currnetly having any impact, indeedy doody.

 

[Big Black Dog]

Must be another slow news day... Couldn't we talk about in-laws or something?

 

[uscitizen]

Scientists have now concluded and are reporting that

weather is not stagnant!

And in an important related discovery, scientist in East Anglia have concluded that global climate has always changed.

And that dies not proove that man is not currnetly having an impact on that change now does it?

and it doesn't proove that IF man is having some slight impact of the weather that it's a bad thing thing

Prove no, suggest yes.

 

[Liability]

Must be another slow news day... Couldn't we talk about in-laws or something?

Canine of color:

Nobody is forcing you to open this thread or to contribute to it.

On the other hand, you have a fair point.

 

[skookerasbil]

With all this talk of how terribly cold this winter has been, how does it compare with winters within the last 150 years?

In 1911, the Niagra Falls froze solidly enough that people were walking on the ice to the edge.

In 1899, the Mississippi had ice on it all the way to New Orleans. It was discharging ice floes into the Gulf.

Thus far, what we have had this year is a cold snap, and a winter precipitation event.

you dummy.............go over and check DRUDGE right now ( I kinda thought the polar bear photo was a nice touch of irony)......................


The lead story paints naive goofballs like you as hoplessly duped!!! What thatched cottage did you grow up in that didnt teach that life is all about politics when it comes right down to it = the gig is up for the anti-capitalist morons!!!


LOL..........it was just am atter of time before this "man-made" global warming stuff was exposed as an elaborate fcukking hox!!!!!



Read and weep s0n.....................



Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
By Jonathan Petre
Last updated at 5:12 PM on 14th February 2010
Comments (698) Add to My Stories
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Data: Professor Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be'
The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.
Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.
Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.
The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0fcAna2Dr

 

[Big Fitz]

The ice loss at the North Pole is at least off-set by the ice gain at the South Pole. Well, according to some sources.

Of course, with you AGW Faithers skewing and concealing the data, who the fuck can tell?

And even if (to the extent that) the planet has been ever so slowly getting warmer, the AGW Faither ARTICLE OF FAITH that such "warming" has been CAUSED by humankind is very much in doubt.

Really? And the tooth fairy told you this? Do you ever bother to look things up before you flap your yap?

Because what you just said is absolute bullshit. You can see that in this graph;

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg

1. Still not man's fault and even Dr. Jones (THE warmist patron saint) has come clean finally on that too.

2. So? I fail to see how this is a bad thing, let alone why did Jones say it's not happening?

3. And what do you propose we do about it since humanity did not cause it?



And to use what I consider an apt metaphor... God just bought you a beer. You willing to finally admit he's real?