Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I live in Florida and we sure hope alot of job creators come here!!! California and New York may as well be closed for business. Who has a few spare million to open a business in those two states?
I appreciate your post.
But I disagree with you. The public sector can create jobs - in fact, a whole shit load of jobs. The US government is the largest employer in the world, I believe.
Whether that's a good thing, I don't know.
No, the public sector can only FUND jobs.
Never create them. Profit motive ONLY creates jobs.
We're getting into some philosophical shit here, which is not something I'm willing to go into.
If a new government agency is created staffed, those are jobs that did not exist, coming into existence. That, literally, is creating a job.
I live in Florida and we sure hope alot of job creators come here!!! California and New York may as well be closed for business. Who has a few spare million to open a business in those two states?
No, the public sector can only FUND jobs.
Never create them. Profit motive ONLY creates jobs.
We're getting into some philosophical shit here, which is not something I'm willing to go into.
If a new government agency is created staffed, those are jobs that did not exist, coming into existence. That, literally, is creating a job.
And that government agency is what the taxpayers demanded so they could be taxed more and increase the deficit?
Not in a million years.
I own 3 corporations. We create jobs.
Government needs to ELIMINATE JOBS.
Demand in the private sector ONLY creates jobs.
Now government policy can create jobs. Lower taxes creates jobs. No minimum wage creates jobs. No capital gains creates jobs.
Wars create jobs but only temporarily.
With all the talk about how there is no one out there that can beat Obama,is the media forgetting that most Americans vote according to their bank accounts and well being? If there are really 15 million unemployed Americans out there,why would they vote for the President who promised to put them back to work? Even if 5 Million find work by the fall of 2012,that still leaves 10 Million unemployed Americans who would of lost patience by then. And if Gas is still over $3.00 a gallon in 2012 with High Food Prices,will the average American still vote for Obama?
Eventually, you guys are going to have to make up your mind.
Either "The President can't create jobs, only the private sector can", or "Obama won't get re-elected because he didn't create jobs".
Which one is it?
I appreciate your post.
But I disagree with you. The public sector can create jobs - in fact, a whole shit load of jobs. The US government is the largest employer in the world, I believe.
Whether that's a good thing, I don't know.
No, the public sector can only FUND jobs.
Never create them. Profit motive ONLY creates jobs.
We're getting into some philosophical shit here, which is not something I'm willing to go into.
If a new government agency is created staffed, those are jobs that did not exist, coming into existence. That, literally, is creating a job.
We're getting into some philosophical shit here, which is not something I'm willing to go into.
If a new government agency is created staffed, those are jobs that did not exist, coming into existence. That, literally, is creating a job.
And that government agency is what the taxpayers demanded so they could be taxed more and increase the deficit?
Not in a million years.
I own 3 corporations. We create jobs.
Government needs to ELIMINATE JOBS.
Demand in the private sector ONLY creates jobs.
Now government policy can create jobs. Lower taxes creates jobs. No minimum wage creates jobs. No capital gains creates jobs.
Wars create jobs but only temporarily.
I'm not arguing that it's sound policy. The fact of the matter is that all of the most educated economists in the world disagree on this should imply that we don't know what the end result is.
All my post said was, in a very literal sense, the government can and does create jobs, which do stimulate the economy.
We're getting into some philosophical shit here, which is not something I'm willing to go into.
If a new government agency is created staffed, those are jobs that did not exist, coming into existence. That, literally, is creating a job.
And that government agency is what the taxpayers demanded so they could be taxed more and increase the deficit?
Not in a million years.
I own 3 corporations. We create jobs.
Government needs to ELIMINATE JOBS.
Demand in the private sector ONLY creates jobs.
Now government policy can create jobs. Lower taxes creates jobs. No minimum wage creates jobs. No capital gains creates jobs.
Wars create jobs but only temporarily.
I'm not arguing that it's sound policy. The fact of the matter is that all of the most educated economists in the world disagree on this should imply that we don't know what the end result is.
All my post said was, in a very literal sense, the government can and does create jobs, which do stimulate the economy.
it would be a surprise if Obama carrys Cally and New York in 2012 assuming their economy is still in the tank by the election. Fine,they can give Obama the votes,I dont think Obama will take Penn,Ohio and Florida next time around.
With all the talk about how there is no one out there that can beat Obama,is the media forgetting that most Americans vote according to their bank accounts and well being? If there are really 15 million unemployed Americans out there,why would they vote for the President who promised to put them back to work? Even if 5 Million find work by the fall of 2012,that still leaves 10 Million unemployed Americans who would of lost patience by then. And if Gas is still over $3.00 a gallon in 2012 with High Food Prices,will the average American still vote for Obama?
Eventually, you guys are going to have to make up your mind.
Either "The President can't create jobs, only the private sector can", or "Obama won't get re-elected because he didn't create jobs".
Which one is it?
with all the talk about how there is no one out there that can beat obama,is the media forgetting that most americans vote according to their bank accounts and well being? If there are really 15 million unemployed americans out there,why would they vote for the president who promised to put them back to work? Even if 5 million find work by the fall of 2012,that still leaves 10 million unemployed americans who would of lost patience by then. And if gas is still over $3.00 a gallon in 2012 with high food prices,will the average american still vote for obama?
eventually, you guys are going to have to make up your mind.
Either "the president can't create jobs, only the private sector can", or "obama won't get re-elected because he didn't create jobs".
Which one is it?
i hate to poop on your parade but let's leave the simple-minded quips to the comedians...let's ponder this:
1) the government can create jobs. It's easy, they just make themselves bigger, however that costs taxpayer dollars of which we don't have a lot of anymore. So, that solution is a self-defeating effort.
2) everyone refers to "obama creating jobs" by passing stupid stimulus bills, bailouts, shovel-ready shi....jobs, etc. However, again that doesn't work. The real jobs needed are in the private sector. How do we do that? Simple:
Cut taxes on individuals and companies. Institute trade reciprocity wherein whatever tariffs or restrictions are imposed on us, we impose equally to imposing countries. Our government (obama and congress) can make it advantageous for businesses to want to do business here. That's where he needs to focus....not spending more money that we don't have.
It's simple....unfortunately so is his mind.
it would be a surprise if Obama carrys Cally and New York in 2012 assuming their economy is still in the tank by the election. Fine,they can give Obama the votes,I dont think Obama will take Penn,Ohio and Florida next time around.
Wanna bet?
