How American gun deaths and gun laws compare to Canada's

[JoeB131]

I think I've made my point clearly enough. For all your whining about what a bad worker other people's are, you engage in behavior that would get most folks fired.

So let's take a sampling of your posts here and send them down to your human resource department.
You know,t he ones where you call people the n-word and threaten to shoot them.

Then we can see how long you have a job.

 

[Skull Pilot]

You're more likely to be unemployed than work an actual job.

I've been unemployed for two weeks in the last 14 years, so uh, no. Man, Cleetus, are you ever right about anything? Thats why Uncle Billy Bob won't done promote you to head Possum Catcher.

copying and pasting crap onto boiler plate resume templates isn't being employed

 

[JoeB131]

copying and pasting crap onto boiler plate resume templates isn't being employed

No, that's not my full time job. That's a side business. and the thing is, my resumes get people jobs. So they do exactly what they are designed to do.

 

[Skull Pilot]

copying and pasting crap onto boiler plate resume templates isn't being employed

No, that's not my full time job. That's a side business. and the thing is, my resumes get people jobs. So they do exactly what they are designed to do.

It's not business either

and really you say a lot of shit that ain't true

 

[JoeB131]

It's not business either

and really you say a lot of shit that ain't true

Since I'm paying taxes on it, yes, it's a business.

 

[Votto]

 

[Votto]

The concept here is that Canada treats gun ownership as a privilage, not a right. So instead of proving why you shouldn't have a gun, you have to prove why you should.

which actually makes a lot more sense.

Yes, people like Obama are privileged, we are not.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Your words referenced "shooting back".

What you really said was "initiating the shooting".

Should they "start it", they will be given very short shrift.

guy, your sort never makes those kinds of distinctions when talking about how you all needs your guns to protect yourself against the "gummit".

And I don't think you'd be as sympathetic to armed Hispanics taking over the immigration center as you would be to the Bundy Family seizing federal lands and buildings.

The rest of your screaming rant is a bunch of Stormfront nonsense that isn't worth my time to address, because you are getting off subject.

Point is, you guys wouldn't suddenly be more friendly to illegal immigrants or Muslims if they started using their second amendment rights to fight back. You'd be doing exactly what you said, expecting the police and the National Guard to do something about them.

so it is EQUALLY absurd for people like you and Dick Tiny (aka 2AGuy) to claim that if ONLY the Jews in Germany had guns, they'd have stopped the Holocaust. Of course they wouldn't have. The Holocaust happened because you have anti-Semitism hard-wired into Christian theology. The Jews killed Jesus. Therefore, they deserve whatever they get.

Yes, after the Holocaust, everyone feels all bad about that, but before it, no one had much of a problem with it. And a few Jews shooting a German soldier wouldn't have made that much better.

Well said. The claim that guns could have stopped what happened in Germany is obviously ridiculous.

Wrong….the nazis came to power because anyone who was a political opponent was beaten and their business destroyed while the police did nothing. So as they were coming to power they taught normal people…who were unarmed, not to interfere with them or resist them….and then they came to power….and again, they used the gun registration records created and collected in the Weimar Republic to disarm their political enemies and the Jews……who they then sent to gas chambers.


Then, after they defeated the weak post World War 1 militaries of the rest of Europe, the civilian populations, being unarmed, were defenseless against the German occupation of their countries……..

Had normal German opponents of the nazis had guns, they nazis could not have intimidated their way to power. Had every country in Europe been like Switzerland, with over 435,000 armed civilians ready to fight against an invasion….the ability of the Germans to take and hold those countries would have been impossible…….and the death camps would not have happened.

No that is complete fantasy.

How could they take the guns before they were in power? You aren't even making sense. Hitler did not make any new gun restrictions. And obviously a few armed citizens weren't going to stop him. Your claims are ridiculous.

Hitler did not make any new gun restrictions.

Like I said, you’re dumber than a brick.

1938 Nazi Gun Ban against Jews

 

[Jroc]

The concept here is that Canada treats gun ownership as a privilage, not a right. So instead of proving why you shouldn't have a gun, you have to prove why you should.

which actually makes a lot more sense.

Yes, people like Obama are privileged, we are not.

The privileged wont have a problem... They don't have a problem with healthcare in Canada either they just come here

 

[JoeB131]

Like I said, you’re dumber than a brick.

1938 Nazi Gun Ban against Jews

here's the problem with that. Gun ownership wasn't the only right Jews lost, they lost all rights. (I'll be in mourning for 15 seconds, at least.) But the reality is, since most of the guns people brought back from WWI were never registered, even the minor gun bans of the Weimar Republic (much stricter than what the Nazis had) really weren't all that effective. Nobody went door to door confiscating guns until after WWII and the allies disarmed the country.

The thing was, when the SS came around to round up the Jews, all those "Good Germans" with guns did... exactly nothing.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

- Pastor Martin Neimoller

If Dictatorship came to America, we wouldn't be any better.

The privileged wont have a problem... They don't have a problem with healthcare in Canada either they just come here

Sorry, man, Health Tourism has been debunked.

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.19

To examine the extent to which Canadian residents seek medical care across the border, we collected data about Canadians’ use of services from ambulatory care facilities and hospitals located in Michigan, New York State, and Washington State during 1994–1998. We also collected information from several Canadian sources, including the 1996 National Population Health Survey, the provincial Ministries of Health, and the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association. Results from these sources do not support the widespread perception that Canadian residents seek care extensively in the United States. Indeed, the numbers found are so small as to be barely detectible relative to the use of care by Canadians at home.