House Representative calls for violent uprising against President

[Article 15]

I could give a fuck about your, "straight-up question" and frankly, you don't deserve and answer.

You don't "give a fuck" because you don't like the obvious answer.

The obvious answer is when you take a fictional scenario and call for it to happen in real life WHICH IS WHAT YOU DID then it becomes a threat.

Don't like my answer? Tough.

Case closed.

 

[not1b4me]

Whew! what a wacko.



Besides a wacko Obermann is also a liar...

 

[Shogun]

....

Unfortunaely, the radical right reactionaries always go for their guns when they don't get their way.

When you come for our liberties we will fight back with our freedom.

and you'll die like randy weaver's family. For real. test this theory. You are closer to tim mcveigh than paul revere.

 

[sealybobo]

Michele Bachmann: I Want People "Armed And Dangerous" Over Obama Tax Plan

This woman should've been defeated last year after her gaffe that anyone who doesn't believe in the Conservative agenda is un-American.

If House Reps messed with Obama, they are the ones who would have to worry about a violent uprising.

 

[rayboyusmc]

BAchman is a loose cannon with a short fuze and no control circuits.

If a dem said that about Bush, that person would be in Gitmo.

Being defeated is a symptom of being right these days.

Not really. If simply said you were defeated, unless you mean being "Right" as in conservative.

 

[amrchaos]

I have a question

Instead of an armed uprising against the government, can't we just settle down on Tar and Feathering bad Bankers?

No need to over throw the Republic when we do it every 2 years.

 

[DiveCon]

BAchman is a loose cannon with a short fuze and no control circuits.

If a dem said that about Bush, that person would be in Gitmo.

Being defeated is a symptom of being right these days.

Not really. If simply said you were defeated, unless you mean being "Right" as in conservative.

Bachman was speaking FIGURATIVELY
lib morons dont seem to understand that

 

[Sarah G]

I have a question

Instead of an armed uprising against the government, can't we just settle down on Tar and Feathering bad Bankers?

No need to over throw the Republic when we do it every 2 years.

We're talking bitter and angry Republicans here. Reason would not be on their list of responses to any situation.

 

[amrchaos]

I have a question

Instead of an armed uprising against the government, can't we just settle down on Tar and Feathering bad Bankers?

No need to over throw the Republic when we do it every 2 years.

We're talking bitter and angry Republicans here. Reason would not be on their list of responses to any situation.

I wonder--are they bitter and angry because they are not in power---or Because the Democrats are about to put them to work on the Budget?

 

[Sarah G]

I have a question

Instead of an armed uprising against the government, can't we just settle down on Tar and Feathering bad Bankers?

No need to over throw the Republic when we do it every 2 years.

We're talking bitter and angry Republicans here. Reason would not be on their list of responses to any situation.

I wonder--are they bitter and angry because they are not in power---or Because the Democrats are about to put them to work on the Budget?

Yes.

 

[DiveCon]

We're talking bitter and angry Republicans here. Reason would not be on their list of responses to any situation.

I wonder--are they bitter and angry because they are not in power---or Because the Democrats are about to put them to work on the Budget?

Yes.

you are too stupid to even understand his question

 

[amrchaos]

I wonder--are they bitter and angry because they are not in power---or Because the Democrats are about to put them to work on the Budget?

Yes.

you are too stupid to even understand his question

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

 

[DiveCon]

Yes.

you are too stupid to even understand his question

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

i know what she meant

and you are wrong to think republicans are bitter
its not our way
thats how the moron libs have been the last 8 years

 

[sealybobo]

you are too stupid to even understand his question

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

i know what she meant

and you are wrong to think republicans are bitter
its not our way
thats how the moron libs have been the last 8 years

What a blind partisan schmuck

 

[DiveCon]

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

i know what she meant

and you are wrong to think republicans are bitter
its not our way
thats how the moron libs have been the last 8 years

What a blind partisan schmuck

a blind partisan moron calling me a partisan

LOL
classic


btw, YOU are the type of lib i was refering to, a fucking moron

 

[Meister]

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

i know what she meant

and you are wrong to think republicans are bitter
its not our way
thats how the moron libs have been the last 8 years

What a blind partisan schmuck

I'm angry as hell to see our great nation going down the the vortex of socialism. I'm really angry bobo!!!! This nation has always been a nation of capitalism...you know, work hard, and be rewarded. Now it's just sit on your butt, and we will pay you. Yeah bobo I'm pissed.

 

[Sarah G]

Yes.

you are too stupid to even understand his question

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

Yes that is what I meant. I was being sarcastic because some Rs here really are bitter about so many things, you can't just pinpoint one.

That they are out of power is a big one though.

 

[Meister]

you are too stupid to even understand his question

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

Yes that is what I meant. I was being sarcastic because some Rs here really are bitter about so many things, you can't just pinpoint one.

That they are out of power is a big one though.

Bitter?...that would be no we aren't. Angry? yeah we're angry because of the direction that the messiah is taking us......on your great grand kids dime.

 

[glockmail]

I could give a fuck about your, "straight-up question" and frankly, you don't deserve and answer.

You don't "give a fuck" because you don't like the obvious answer.

The obvious answer is when you take a fictional scenario and call for it to happen in real life WHICH IS WHAT YOU DID then it becomes a threat.

Don't like my answer? Tough.

Case closed.

That's your opinion girlie. However I never saw anyone accuse Clancey of that so your opinion is worth shit.

 

[Sarah G]

I think she meant yes to both parts of the question. Republicans are angry because they are out of power and must work harder than they did when they were in power.

Yes that is what I meant. I was being sarcastic because some Rs here really are bitter about so many things, you can't just pinpoint one.

That they are out of power is a big one though.

Bitter?...that would be no we aren't. Angry? yeah we're angry because of the direction that the messiah is taking us......on your great grand kids dime.

I was bitter about the direction Bush took as well along with a lot of other Democrats. I wouldn't have supported overthrowing the government or seceeding from the union. We never heard anything about that kind of thing back then.