House panel approves $10 billion for border wall; Democrats show how little American lives matter...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AsianTrumpSupporter, Oct 5, 2017.

  1. AsianTrumpSupporter
    Online

    AsianTrumpSupporter Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,946
    Thanks Received:
    778
    Trophy Points:
    355
    Location:
    Democratic People's Republique de Californie
    Ratings:
    +3,793
    ...by opposing it already:

    House panel approves $10B for border wall

    The House Homeland Security Committee approved Wednesday a border security bill that includes $10 billion for a border wall.

    The Border Security for America Act, proposed by committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas), was passed on a party-line 18-12 vote.

    The bill includes the $10 billion in border wall funding, $5 billion to improve ports of entry and adds 5,000 agents to both the Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection.

    The legislation would also authorize the federal government to reimburse states up to $35 million for use of National Guard assets to reinforce border security.

    The legislation will head to the House floor amid debate over whether border security provisions should be attached to potential legislation to protect recipients of the rescinded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

    Democrats criticized the bill as a political stunt to appease President Trump, who proposed the border wall as a central point of his campaign.

    "There was a time in the not too far distant past when this committee cared for facts, data and results," said ranking member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).

    Thompson called the Republican proposal an attempt to "fulfill a misguided campaign promise."

    McCaul praised Trump's focus on border security and urged the committee to seize the opportunity to legislate on the issue.

    "We finally have a partner in the White House who has prioritized this issue, and it's time for Congress to do its job," he said.

    While the bill is expected to pass the House, it's unlikely to clear the Senate, where it needs a 60-vote majority.

    But Democrats are wary that the bill's provisions could be the first shot at a Republican proposal for border security measures on a bill to protect so-called Dreamers — undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children — in the wake of Trump's rescission of DACA.

    "There's no doubt that this is a setup for that conversation," said Rep. Nannette Barragán (D-Calif.), a committee member.

    To show their disdain for the idea of building a border wall, the bill's central tenet, Democratic committee members proposed tongue-in-cheek amendments.

    Thompson proposed changing the bill's name to "Taking Americans' Land to Build Trump's Wall Act of 2017," and Rep. Filemon Vela (D-Texas) proposed a definition of "border wall" that would include the terms "big and beautiful," "real," "inclusive of a door" and "paid for by the Mexican Government."

    Vela also made a proposal to withhold wall construction funds until Mexico agreed to reimburse them, alluding to Trump's campaign pledge to get Mexico to pay for a border wall.

    "I appreciate the gentleman's creativity in this amendment and sense of humor, but I will oppose this amendment," said McCaul.

    But debate centered on the impact of the border wall on border communities and the environment on the border.

    Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) made two proposals to protect the environment; Democrats said they were good in spirit but opposed them because they require no oversight of the secretary of Homeland Security.

    None of the Democratic proposals were accepted, but an amendment put forth by Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) was unanimously accepted.

    Her proposal would force a substantial part of investments in border security, such as control centers, to be installed in the border, rather than remotely.

    "It's a good amendment and we support it," said Thompson, ending debate on the matter.

    Still, Democrats were incensed that a $15 billion proposal that includes measures they deem unnecessary would see a House vote...

    For all the crocodile tears shed by the likes of Jimmy Kimmel, liberals sure are quick to oppose anything that would protect America from being invaded by the likes of MS-13 and other terrorists.
     
  2. shockedcanadian
    Offline

    shockedcanadian Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,225
    Thanks Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    335
    Ratings:
    +4,462
    "There was a time in the not too far distant past when this committee cared for facts, data and results," said ranking member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).

    He makes that comment but doesn't include the discussion of the passing of Obamacare and it's massive failings? It seems the "facts" can be manipulated by agencies driven by politics.

    The proven fact is that America spends over $125B a year on the illegal immigration issue, the $10B is a fraction of these costs and it's not an annual massive cost as the illegal issue is.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    138,366
    Thanks Received:
    22,117
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +58,287
    Why didn't the House pass legislation to impose tariffs on Mexico to make them pay for it?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. shockedcanadian
    Offline

    shockedcanadian Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,225
    Thanks Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    335
    Ratings:
    +4,462
    They will pay for it, this you can be sure. Keep your eye on the NAFTA negotiations, both Canada and Mexico are going to be repaying their debt, with interest in some cases.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
  5. Moonglow
    Offline

    Moonglow Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    100,164
    Thanks Received:
    9,535
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +40,655
    Should we hold our breathe in anticipation?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    138,366
    Thanks Received:
    22,117
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +58,287
    Then where is the legislation?

    If you want Mexico to pay for it you need laws imposing the fees

    Why are they making the taxpayer pay for it without offering a single piece of legislation making Mexico pay?
     
  7. TomParks
    Offline

    TomParks Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,270
    Thanks Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,293
    Yeah they have already hinted on this....China is going to get hit hard as well
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. Timmy
    Offline

    Timmy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2015
    Messages:
    13,951
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,429
    Meanwhile the GOP is busy protecting ms13's access to guns .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. busybee01
    Offline

    busybee01 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    2,795
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    That is so much bull. We do not need a border wall. It is a waste of money. We also do not need 5,000 border agents either. We do not need to turn this into a police state. A strong majority of Americans do not support building a wall. It has nothing to do with MS-13 and terrorists. That is a straw man and nothing more.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. busybee01
    Offline

    busybee01 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    2,795
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    Go ahead and start a trade war. Americans will lose big time.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2

Share This Page