House or Rep finds Benghazi not a scandal

[thereisnospoon]

This means nothing.

 

[HUGGY]

This means nothing.

Of course you are right. After all Obama is only 3/5ths of a man. Serves him right. Negros have no business in government.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

 

[Siete]

I wouldn't take the words of NBC if it came notorized on their tongues

they should just change the name to, DNC

The House Select Committee was made up of members of the media? Shocking relevation Stefunny !!!

How many thousands of wasted hours and millions of dollars was thrown away in this bogus attempt to blame Obama? How much time will be rightfully donated to retracting all the lies? 10 minutes? Zero ??

. This outcome proves it conclusively.

comedian vermin ... the brunt of political jokers.

 

[TheOldSchool]

18 days too late

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This means nothing.

Of course not. Since when have facts meant anything to the Benghazi Brigade?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’

Wait, wut? Your entire post is based upon this wasn't a terror attack it was all due to a video and in the end what difference does it make. Right? Isn't that your point here and how does your post support that lie?

 

[Siete]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

This means nothing.

Of course not. Since when have facts meant anything to the Benghazi Brigade?

Mind pointing out where in his post where it supports the admins lying bullshit line of blaming a video and it wasn't a terrorist attack? A good doctor would look into the entire post, an obiecare doctor may not look that deep.

 

[Siete]

‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’

Wait, wut? Your entire post is based upon this wasn't a terror attack it was all due to a video and in the end what difference does it make. Right? Isn't that your point here and how does your post support that lie?

ask Issa or Trey ... the Intelligence Boys !

 

[Missouri_Mike]

‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’

Wait, wut? Your entire post is based upon this wasn't a terror attack it was all due to a video and in the end what difference does it make. Right? Isn't that your point here and how does your post support that lie?

ask Issa or Trey ... the Intelligence Boys !

I'm asking you, you stupid fuck.

 

[HUGGY]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

You must be proud. Congratulations! America was driven away from the pols with your lies. Pay attention people. This is what you voted for. People that missuse their positions and take a tragedy and lie about it for their own personal gain. Any republican senator that was part of this scheme should be impeached.

 

[Borillar]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

You must be proud. Congratulations! America was driven away from the pols with your lies. Pay attention people. This is what you voted for. People that missuse their positions and take a tragedy and lie about it for their own personal gain. Any republican senator that was part of this scheme should be impeached.

That''s OK. I'm sure the Republicans put their apologies for the months of endless hysteria and invective in the mail before heading home for Thanksgiving.

 

[Plasmaball]

This means nothing.

it never does....Thats why you live in a bubble

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

This means nothing.

Of course not. Since when have facts meant anything to the Benghazi Brigade?

What facts are you speaking of?

The facts which say that what everyone saw happen, did not happen?

Sadly, that is known as DELUSION, not fact.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

You must be proud. Congratulations! America was driven away from the pols with your lies. Pay attention people. This is what you voted for. People that missuse their positions and take a tragedy and lie about it for their own personal gain. Any republican senator that was part of this scheme should be impeached.

What lies are those, specifically?

 

[Borillar]

Yeah, who would've ever guessed the GOP was just trying to capitalize on "BENGHAZI!!!" for political gain.

I mean we only had what??? Nine investigations now? All of them coming up with no charges at the White House?

I'm certain the tenth investigation will come up with something.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

Yep... they also won more house seats, more governor seats, more state house and senate seats.

And sadly for your feelings, claiming what happened, didn't happen, is not a viable defense.

But it was the best ya could do.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This means nothing.

Of course not. Since when have facts meant anything to the Benghazi Brigade?

Mind pointing out where in his post where it supports the admins lying bullshit line of blaming a video and it wasn't a terrorist attack? A good doctor would look into the entire post, an obiecare doctor may not look that deep.

Did you miss this part of the article?

The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.

‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’

However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


The House ... as in REPUBLICANS ....

damn the RW's are 0 fer today.

the shit surfaces ...

The Obama administration didn’t issue ‘stand down’ orders to security forces at the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya or knowingly give erroneous details about the incident to the public, a quietly-released report by the House Intelligence Committee concluded Friday.
The two-year investigation by the bipartisan panel shoots down a series of conspiracy theories and cover-up claims. It’s the fourth congressional committee to reach similar conclusions.
‘The report has endeavored to make the facts and conclusions within this report widely and publicly available so that the American public can separate the actual facts from the swirl of rumors and unsupported allegations,’ the report stated in its findings.
It debunks talk that the administration ordered CIA and security forces at the compound to ‘stand down’ during that attacks that led to the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.
The findings could prove a boon to potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who was President Barack Obama’s secretary of state at the time of the attack.
And it’s a potential blow to congressional Republicans, conservatives, and tea party supporters who’ve accused the Obama administration of covering up details of the Benghazi attack.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives earlier this year created a Benghazi Select Committee chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to further examine what occurred on Sept. 11, 2012.
‘Appropriate U.S. personnel made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,’ the report said. ‘The committee, however, received evidence that the State Department security, personnel, resources and equipment were unable to counter the terrorist threat that day and required CIA assistance.’
The intelligence committee report paints of picture of heroism at the scene the night of the attack and confusion in intelligence assessments in the early aftermath of the deadly incident.
In addition, it rejects claims of witness intimidation by superiors about the attack and affirms that there was no intelligence failure before the attack.
It concludes that a ‘mixed group’ of individuals, including some linked to al Qaida, were involved in the attack.
The report also backs White House’s assertion that it didn’t deliberately disclose misleading information about the attack when then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice - now Obama’s national security advisor - spoke about the incident on television with talking points that were erroneous.
‘The committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the administrations initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate,’ the report found. ‘There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The committee found intelligence to support CIA’s initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest.’
However, the CIA didn’t resolve the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television and claimed that the attack was spawned by a protest over a video that Muslims considered offensive.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the house intelligence committee chair, and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said their panel’s probe was comprehensive.
‘We spent thousands of hours asking questions, pouring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and email, and held a total of 20 committee events and hearings,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives.’

Read more here: National news from McClatchy DC News Washington DC


SUP TREY ?

D'ooooooooooooh !

ROFLMNAO!

Adorable... .

"The obama Dancers!" Ladies and Gentlemen!

Please give them a BIG USMB HAND for a vacuous rationalization of the feckless variety!

​

the Republicans won the Senate.

Yep... they also won more house seats, more governor seats, more state house and senate seats.

And sadly for your feelings, claiming what happened, didn't happen, is not a viable defense.

But it was the best ya could do.

What happened, exactly?