Hottest September on recond says UAH

LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
 
LOL Only a dumb fuck like you would see that in that graph. Look at the high points on the median prior to 1998, then look at those after 1998. Does that look like a pause. Now do the same for the low points. A pause? LOL From 2002 to 2008, all the low points were higher than the high points on the median prior to 1998. And for that whole period, 1998 to present, there were only three points that went below the zero line. Now compare that to the period before 1998. Almost all the red was below the zero point.

You 'Conservatives' just keep proving what lousy liars you are by repeating that stupid comment about the 'pause'. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see there was not pause. But, of course, that does not include you.
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.
 
Blah blah blah does not eradicate the 2 decade pause, its still on the chart
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
 
Hottest September on record says UAH .54c.


Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD
UAH_LT_1979_thru_September_2017_v6.jpg


http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.txt
That pretty graph cinches it for me. But, Mr Science how long have we been keeping records? How hot was it in September in 1267 AD? Did they even call it September then?
 
There was no pause.

LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
haha... okay idiot... you are so smart, and the scientists who gathered the data and made the chart are wrong. What kind of absolute moron tells himself this and believes it? You are embarrassing yourself.
 
That pretty graph cinches it for me. But, Mr Science how long have we been keeping records? How hot was it in September in 1267 AD? Did they even call it September then?
"That pretty graph cinches it for me. "
Then you are being irratonal.
I was being sarcastic. I thought that the rest of my post you quoted would have made that clear.
 
LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
haha... okay idiot... you are so smart, and the scientists who gathered the data and made the chart are wrong. What kind of absolute moron tells himself this and believes it? You are embarrassing yourself.

LOL

You refuse to read the chart
 
LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
haha... okay idiot... you are so smart, and the scientists who gathered the data and made the chart are wrong. What kind of absolute moron tells himself this and believes it? You are embarrassing yourself.
Someone who realizes that government paid liberals will rig any data to meet the requirements of the corrupt politicians behind it and even go so far as to fix it so it looks almost real to gullible parrots who gloss over and go, "Yep, dats right!".
 
LOL.

Not according to the chart.

LOL

If that was the price chart of a stock that you bought in 1998, would the price have been higher or lower during the next 2 decades?
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
haha... okay idiot... you are so smart, and the scientists who gathered the data and made the chart are wrong. What kind of absolute moron tells himself this and believes it? You are embarrassing yourself.


Loserterians and anti-government fascist live within the twilight zone.
 
Wrong, the chart does not indicate a pause in global warming. You have no idea what you are talking about, do not know how to correctly read that chart, don't understand the methods used to analyze that data, amd are making the absurd and bizarre suggestion that scientists are all lying. You are embarrassing yourself.
LOL.

If you bought in 1998, how much did you make over the next 2 decades?
Nobody who knows anything about this at all would think that is a valid way of looking at a plot of noisy data. You are utterly and totally ignorant of the most fundamental principles of this topic, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Translation: I'm totally fucked and have no real answer that won't make anyone double over with laughter
haha... okay idiot... you are so smart, and the scientists who gathered the data and made the chart are wrong. What kind of absolute moron tells himself this and believes it? You are embarrassing yourself.


Loserterians and anti-government fascist live within the twilight zone.
The same people who claim repeatedly they can forecast climate change with a data set barely 150 years old on an ecology over 4 billion years old. The stupid is quasar sized.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top