Hottest June on record and the hottest 6 months on record..Noaa!

Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data
So you have no data to post. You just swallow what they feed you without question.
Good lemming stooge.
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data

Can you tell me what each of those are, and how they compare directly to more modern methods?
Also, as the data itself been "washed" or are we dealing with raw, unfiltered data?

I know what I am talking about, do you? I am curious to see if you even have a rudimentary understanding of data collection, data processing, data manipulation, and the concept of "GIGO".
 
Amazing, all this all time record high temps, including ocean temps, and the record setting drought of Cat 3 strikes on the US continues to grow...

One would think record high ocean temps would lead to more 'canes.

Or, you can fudge temps, but you can't fudge Cat 3 strikes...

LOL!!!
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data

Can you tell me what each of those are, and how they compare directly to more modern methods?
Also, as the data itself been "washed" or are we dealing with raw, unfiltered data?

I know what I am talking about, do you? I am curious to see if you even have a rudimentary understanding of data collection, data processing, data manipulation, and the concept of "GIGO".

We all know plankton is accurate to a tenth of a degree
 
NCDC charged with manipulating data to “prove” global warming – The Tribune Papers
Read the above link and then respond.
Noaa used to use around 6000 stations for temp data. They have reduced that down to around 1500. Why?

NOAA has the credibility of Bernie Madoffs accountant


You have no accountability. If it wasn't for the noaa we wouldn't even have a meteorological record to make judgement.

Must be nice being so full of himself.
cause 4500 stations were lying.
 
Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you
The process is called simple arithmetic.

So you didn't actually measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree, you're just using an accounting trick...is that what you're saying?

Can you share with us the data set of deep ocean temperatures from 136 years ago?
Averaging a number of temperature readings is not an "accounting trick."
so are you saying that they didn't use arithmetic back 136 years ago? See the issue it's changed.
 
Yep,,those erroneous 5000 station temps!
It always befuddles me how our areas temp was fine when reported from our rural airport ,about 15 miles away, was suddenly removed to now be reported from the international airport, which is already used for the warmer city center over 30 miles away. We historically have run a few degrees cooler, and still do, but that can't be reported, it goes against the agenda.
NCDC charged with manipulating data to “prove” global warming – The Tribune Papers
Read the above link and then respond.
Noaa used to use around 6000 stations for temp data. They have reduced that down to around 1500. Why?

NOAA has the credibility of Bernie Madoffs accountant


You have no accountability. If it wasn't for the noaa we wouldn't even have a meteorological record to make judgement.

Must be nice being so full of himself.
Those lower readings had to be erroneous so had to be purged from the data.
 
Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you
The process is called simple arithmetic.

So you didn't actually measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree, you're just using an accounting trick...is that what you're saying?

Can you share with us the data set of deep ocean temperatures from 136 years ago?
Averaging a number of temperature readings is not an "accounting trick."
so are you saying that they didn't use arithmetic back 136 years ago? See the issue it's changed.
Not only can't the deniers do simple arithmetic, they can't understand the English language.
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data

Did you actually look at the data set before you called us liars?

I had trouble opening it

Can you please post it?
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data

Did you actually look at the data set before you called us liars?

I had trouble opening it

Can you please post it?
That's because you are too lazy to read the instructions on how to download and read the files.

World Ocean Database: reading data
 
Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.
Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Did you even read the data collection methods used (plankton data?), or do you just link crap and assume some smug sense of superiority from it, bitch tits?
Typical lying scum denier, you give them the data then they whine and cry and then bitch about one of the methods for collecting the data as if it was the only method!

Bottle, low resolution CTD, and plankton data

Did you actually look at the data set before you called us liars?

I had trouble opening it

Can you please post it?
That's because you are too lazy to read the instructions on how to download and read the files.

World Ocean Database: reading data

So you didn't open the data before spewing.

OK

Thank you

"The WOD native data format can be read in a number of ways:

(1) The user can use any of a number of sample programs in FORTRAN and C to read the WOD13 native data format or the user can write his/her own code. The programs provided are designed as examples on how to read the WOD13 data for all types of datasets and convert data into a form useable in Matlab and ArcGIS. The sample programs prompt the user to input a data file to read casts and variables included in these casts to the screen. Note that the user needs to modify the programs to incorporate user specific needs such as single or multiple input data files, output file(s), number of cast, data output format and number of variables. The metadata codes listed within each cast are described in the code tables.

extrnl_link2.gif
(2) The user can also use the Ocean Data View (ODV) software package to read the WOD native format and display the data.
extrnl_link2.gif
WOD13 data do not upload into versions of ODV prior to 3.1 ODV. Ocean Data View 4.5.7 has been updated to read the amended format. The latest version is available from ODV website. The user will need to open a new ODV collection (or add to an existing ODV collection) and specify "World Ocean Database Variables" in the "Definition of Collection Variables" menu. The detailed instructions are available from WOD tutorial (pdf, 0.1 MB). Note that ODV will not be able to read surface only data; originator's quality flags; or plankton biomass and taxonomic data in the OSD file.

Reading WOD comma separated value (".csv") format:
The WOD ".csv" output files are space and comma-separated ASCII values. The ".csv" files can be imported into any software that allows to read "csv" data format such as Microsoft Excel. Please see the WOD "csv" data format description."

LOL

They can't just have a PDF of the data?

LOL
 
And the lame stream media is now using "feels like" wet bulb temps becasue the real temps are no where near historic or major records of any kind.. The real temp over most of the mid west will be in the low 90's while the wet bulb temps they are touting (on ABC) are 113 degrees...

Got to love these charltons.. they will lie to keep the left wing agenda alive until they die from frost bite or freezing to death.
 

Forum List

Back
Top