Hottest June on record and the hottest 6 months on record..Noaa!

[martybegan]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

 

[edthecynic]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

 

[Weatherman2020]

Hottest June on record and the hottest 6 months on record..Noaa!
Global Analysis - June 2015 National Centers for Environmental Information NCEI

The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for June 2015 was the highest for June in the 136-year period of record, at 0.88°C (1.58°F) above the 20th century average of 15.5°C (59.9°F), surpassing the previous record set just one year ago by 0.12°C (0.22°F). This was also the fourth highest monthly departure from average for any month on record. The two highest monthly departures from average occurred earlier this year in February and March, both at 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average for their respective months, while January 2007 had the third highest, at 0.89°C (1.60°F) above its monthly average.

June 2015 also marks the fourth month this year that has broken its monthly temperature record, along with February, March, and May. The other months of 2015 were not far behind: January was second warmest for its respective month and April was third warmest. These six warm months combined with the previous six months (four of which were also record warm) to make the period July 2014–June 2015 the warmest 12-month period in the 136-year period of record, surpassing the previous record set just last month (June 2014–May 2015). As shown in the table below, the 10 warmest 12-month periods have all been marked in the past 10 months.

The first six months of 2015 comprised the warmest such period on record across the world's land and ocean surfaces, at 0.85°C (1.53°F) above the 20th century average, surpassing the previous record set in 2010 by 0.09°C (0.16°F). It should be noted that 2010 was the last year with El Niño conditions; however El Niño had ended by this point in 2010, while it appears to be continuing to mature at the same point in 2015.
The average global sea surface temperature of +0.65°C (+1.17°F) for the year-to-date was the highest for January–June in the 136-year period of record, surpassing the previous record of 2010 by 0.04°C (0.07°F). The average land surface temperature of +1.40°C (2.52°F) was also record high, surpassing the previous record of 2007 by 0.13°C (0.23°F).

Pretty fucking Amazing I'd say.

Great news. Since most weather related deaths are due to cold, this will save millions of lives.

 

[Weatherman2020]

NCDC charged with manipulating data to “prove” global warming – The Tribune Papers
Read the above link and then respond.
Noaa used to use around 6000 stations for temp data. They have reduced that down to around 1500. Why?

NOAA has the credibility of Bernie Madoffs accountant

You have no accountability. If it wasn't for the noaa we wouldn't even have a meteorological record to make judgement.

Must be nice being so full of himself.

Those lower readings had to be erroneous so had to be purged from the data.

 

[martybegan]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

you ignore the accuracy and precision of instrumentation from past eras, in conjunction with the locations and methods of data collection in those eras, which is what I was actually asking you.

Either you are being obtuse, or you really don't understand the concept.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

The world was filled with ships using calibrated temperature gages recording water temperatures at the same depth in 1881, doncha know?

 

[Weatherman2020]

What we need is another climate conference in the French Rivera to discuss this startling revelation. Climatologists can again fly in from all over the world in private jets to discuss what to do.

If only there were devices available so they didn't have to put millions of tons of carbon in the atmosphere just to discuss this topic.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So you didn't actually measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree, you're just using an accounting trick...is that what you're saying?

Can you share with us the data set of deep ocean temperatures from 136 years ago?

 

[edthecynic]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

you ignore the accuracy and precision of instrumentation from past eras, in conjunction with the locations and methods of data collection in those eras, which is what I was actually asking you.

Either you are being obtuse, or you really don't understand the concept.

Or most likely you don't understand simple arithmetic!

 

[edthecynic]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So you didn't actually measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree, you're just using an accounting trick...is that what you're saying?

Can you share with us the data set of deep ocean temperatures from 136 years ago?

Averaging a number of temperature readings is not an "accounting trick."

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

you ignore the accuracy and precision of instrumentation from past eras, in conjunction with the locations and methods of data collection in those eras, which is what I was actually asking you.

Either you are being obtuse, or you really don't understand the concept.

Or most likely you don't understand simple arithmetic!

Why not make it accurate to 20 decimal points? Why stop at a tenth?

It's just an accounting fiction anyway

 

[Weatherman2020]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

you ignore the accuracy and precision of instrumentation from past eras, in conjunction with the locations and methods of data collection in those eras, which is what I was actually asking you.

Either you are being obtuse, or you really don't understand the concept.

Or most likely you don't understand simple arithmetic!

Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.

 

[martybegan]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So adding and subtracting gets you ocean temperature over the entire globe in 1881?

Adding each temperature reading and then dividing by the total number of readings gives you an average accurate to a tenth of a degree.
For example:
2+3 divided by 2 = 2.5

you ignore the accuracy and precision of instrumentation from past eras, in conjunction with the locations and methods of data collection in those eras, which is what I was actually asking you.

Either you are being obtuse, or you really don't understand the concept.

Or most likely you don't understand simple arithmetic!

Nice dodge of the question, bitch-tits.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Crick, please describe the process by which we obtained ocean temperature accurate to tenth of a degree 136 years ago

Thank you

The process is called simple arithmetic.

So you didn't actually measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree, you're just using an accounting trick...is that what you're saying?

Can you share with us the data set of deep ocean temperatures from 136 years ago?

Averaging a number of temperature readings is not an "accounting trick."

Sure it is, when you can't measure to a tenth of a degree and have NO MEASUREMENTS of the deep ocean, it's all an accounting fiction

 

[CrusaderFrank]

1881 average temperature of the Pacific Ocean at a depth of 700m is 61.2424212564623546788956456732145F, right?

What difference does it make?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Data set of deep ocean temperature 1881-1900:

End of Data

Therefore average temperature is 61.089845060395038274960352536F

 

[edthecynic]

Sure it is, when you can't measure to a tenth of a degree and have NO MEASUREMENTS of the deep ocean, it's all an accounting fiction

Only to a worthless lying POS!

WOD time sorted data

 

[edthecynic]

Data set of deep ocean temperature 1881-1900:

End of Data

Therefore average temperature is 61.089845060395038274960352536F

Lying scum!

WOD time sorted data

 

[edthecynic]

Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.

Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

 

[Weatherman2020]

Show us how easy math is. Post the oceanic data from 1881 with the location and depth taken, then do your amazing division math.

Deniers are the laziest stupid fucks in the universe.
WOD time sorted data

Please post the data. You support it, which means you have it.

Thermal layering of the ocean has enormous impacts on temperature readings, so please supply location and depth.