Hope This Isn't True - BO Grants China US Property As Collateral For Loans

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Burp, Mar 1, 2009.

  1. Burp
    Offline

    Burp Always carry, never tell

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,133
    Thanks Received:
    192
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +192
    Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!

    The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.

    This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

    Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

    From: Feds Grant Eminent Domain As Collateral To China For U.S. Debts! | Ron Paul Wins! | Campaign for Liberty at the Daily Paul

    China was looking for guarantees for repayment.
     
  2. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,748
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,749
    Frankly I don't believe that.
     
  3. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    73,115
    Thanks Received:
    8,615
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +14,582
    im not sure that would be legal.
     
  4. xotoxi
    Online

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    31,000
    Thanks Received:
    5,258
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +6,231

    And in other news, the Pope Converts to Judaism.
     
  5. raceright
    Offline

    raceright Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Long Island
    Ratings:
    +33
    Frankly I don't doubt it, reason for 2nd amendment
     
  6. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    coming from THAT source, i highly doubt it myself
     
  7. Burp
    Offline

    Burp Always carry, never tell

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,133
    Thanks Received:
    192
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +192
    I'm with you all - just can't see this happening.

    Hope we are right.
     
  8. elvis
    Offline

    elvis BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,303
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4,303
    who the hell is fico?
     
  9. michiganFats
    Offline

    michiganFats BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,055
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Ratings:
    +171
    I'm calling bullshit on this one.
     
  10. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    71,310
    Thanks Received:
    13,231
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +23,736
    Ditto... and the underlying article from Bloomberg says nothing about putting up US property as security.
     

Share This Page