Homosexuals disproportionately represented among pedophiles.

And I just discovered that there isn't a homosexual gene, it's completely a choice to be or not to be gay, just as it is to live traditionally. No gay gene

If I'm not mistaken, it would fall somewhere between the First Amendment and Driving Your Traditional Parents Over a Cliff.

:lmao:
 
The Human Genome Project established years ago that there is no gay gene.

Followed by the debunking of the twin study that one of the liars here presented via "Ask the Genetecist" link that allegedly "proves" homosexuality is hardwired (though the genetecist, despite referencing the study, did cover his ass by stating it "was only one study").

There is absolutely no evidence that homosexuality is hardwired. It doesnt' exist.

But that doesn't stop the Kinsey-drenched progressives from saying things like "although no conclusive evidence has yet been uncovered that conclusively asserts that sexuality is hardwired, it is PROBABLE" or "experts agree that it is LIKELY that"...

All euphenisms for "we don't know but we want you to think you can't resist sexual urges".
 
I did find a predisposition among male pedophiles - one study says they tend to be shorter--by 2cm than other males. Lower average height

Since males range in height from 4'11" to 7'6", 2cm is less than an inch. So the study may have more to do with perception coming into play a little--a shorter man may have the perception a child is actually older since he has probably suffered a little harassment for being a little shorter than someone his own age. A 5' tall man, therefore, might consider a 5'2" 11-year-old girl as being his own age, or even a little older than himself and may be unable to control her if she grows to be 5'6".

I'm not trying to make any excuses, I'm just trying to get into the head of someone who becomes addicted to child porn and engaging in sexual relations exclusively with people much smaller than himself, who generally are children.
 
The Human Genome Project established years ago that there is no gay gene.

Followed by the debunking of the twin study that one of the liars here presented via "Ask the Genetecist" link that allegedly "proves" homosexuality is hardwired (though the genetecist, despite referencing the study, did cover his ass by stating it "was only one study").

There is absolutely no evidence that homosexuality is hardwired. It doesn't' exist.

But that doesn't stop the Kinsey-drenched progressives from saying things like "although no conclusive evidence has yet been uncovered that conclusively asserts that sexuality is hardwired, it is PROBABLE" or "experts agree that it is LIKELY that"...

All euphemisms for "we don't know but we want you to think you can't resist sexual urges".
Well, I used to think there had to be a genetic cause, because I couldn't accept it as a "choice." I'm now seeing that it is a choice a person makes for reasons nobody knows. :dunno:
 
I think usually for multiple, sometimes unknown, reasons. A combination of things, and I think different people have different causes.

Which is why it's so stupid to proclaim, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, that it's "hardwired" and people can't "help" it. Every person is an individual, and the consensus..at this point, anyway...is that there are myriad reasons for it.
 
The Human Genome Project established years ago that there is no gay gene.

Followed by the debunking of the twin study that one of the liars here presented via "Ask the Genetecist" link that allegedly "proves" homosexuality is hardwired (though the genetecist, despite referencing the study, did cover his ass by stating it "was only one study").

There is absolutely no evidence that homosexuality is hardwired. It doesnt' exist.

But that doesn't stop the Kinsey-drenched progressives from saying things like "although no conclusive evidence has yet been uncovered that conclusively asserts that sexuality is hardwired, it is PROBABLE" or "experts agree that it is LIKELY that"...

All euphenisms for "we don't know but we want you to think you can't resist sexual urges".

Gay Or Straight? Body Type And Motion Reveals Sexual Orientation, Study Suggests
^Gays and lesbians have more gender-incongruent body types and movements then straights.
^People were able to significantly identify gays and lesbians just by viewing the motion in which they moved.

The Science of Gaydar - New Research on Everything From Voice Pitch to Hair Whorl -- New York Magazine
^Gay men are three times as likely to have a counterclockwise hair whorl then straight men.
^Gays and lesbians have a 50% higher chance to be left handed or ambidextrous then straights.
^gay men tend to have finger lengths that match that of straight women such as having index and ring fingers of the same length.
^75% of gay men "sounded" gay to an audience.
^Gay men and straight women have an increased density of fingerprint ridges on the thumb and pinkie of the left hand.
^gay men have larger penis sizes then straight men.

Men with Older Brothers More Likely to be Gay - ABC News
^The more older brothers you have the more likely you are to be gay.

Biological Correlates of being Gay - Biological Determinism?
^Gay men’s otoacousitc emissions (sounds that are emitted by the ears) are different then straight men’s.
^Gay’s anterior hypothalamus has differences from their straight counterparts.

The Science of Sex: The "Gay Brain" Revisited | Nerve.com
^Gay men have smaller hypothalamuses then straight men.

Homosexuality: Inborn or Learned Behavior? (1) - Mental Health - Families.com
^When smelling male sweat straight women and gay men saw activity in the hypothalamus which is connected to sexual activity.

Hormones in the womb will result in homosexuality. Male fetuses whose hypothalamus is not exposed to enough testosterone in the womb cause those fetuses to become gay. Also certain chemicals block testosterone which leads to the fetus becoming gay. Also when a woman has a baby boy, her body develops antibodies to proteins made by the sons Y chromosome, which then affect future development of a male fetus.

Why is it that every one of your posts is prue bullshit riddle with stupidity beyond any level seen in the common world?
 
It is what it is. Don't hate me, I'm just the messenger:

" the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually."

The proportions of heterosexual and homos... [J Sex Marital Ther. 1992] - PubMed - NCBI

Watch the homosexual lobby of the board bury this.

FBI stats in the past have reached a different conclusion; as victims of pedophiles are often not confined to one gender, this has little weight.
 
Other research;

The American Psychological Association stated in its 2001 website article "Understanding Child Sexual Abuse: Education, Prevention, and Recovery":
"Studies on who commits child sexual abuse vary in their findings, but the most common finding is that the majority of sexual offenders are family members or are otherwise known to the child. Sexual abuse by strangers is not nearly as common as sexual abuse by family members.
Research further shows that men perpetrate most instances of sexual abuse, but there are cases in which women are the offenders.
Despite a common myth, homosexual men are not more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexual men are."

2001 - American Psychological Association

Ray Blanchard, PhD, Head of Clinical Sexology Services at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, in his Oct. 2000 article "Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles," in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, wrote:
"...Ordinary (teleiophilic) homosexual men are no more likely to molest boys than ordinary (teleiophilic) heterosexual men are to molest girls..."

Oct. 2000 - Ray Blanchard, PhD
 
97% of pedophiles are male. 60% of the victims of pedophiles are boys. Do the math. All pedophiles who molest boys are homosexual.
 
97% of pedophiles are male. 60% of the victims of pedophiles are boys. Do the math. All pedophiles who molest boys are homosexual.
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
For the present discussion, the important point is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age
 

Forum List

Back
Top