Homeless TRUMP Supporter Guards Donald Trump’s Star on Hollywood Blvd

You said...
You were talking about folks being brought in by the government, not illegals sneaking across the border, when you said that.

The famous sonnet I posted spits on your idiocy and accepts people [legally] from anywhere on Earth, regardless of how poor they are or how little they "benefit this country."


Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


Upon arrival at Ellis Island, immigrants were ushered into a room called the Great Hall and paraded before a series of medical officers for physical inspection. Most were allowed to pass by in a matter of seconds, but those whom the doctors deemed physically or mentally deficient were marked with chalk and taken away for additional screening. Questionable candidates were forced to submit to more detailed questioning and medical exams, and any signs of contagious disease, poor physique, feeblemindedness or insanity could see an immigrant denied admittance on the grounds that they were likely to become a ward of the state.
9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg
Then how many are you sponsoring?
As I have no family seeking to immigrate, none.
 
Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg
Then how many are you sponsoring?
As I have no family seeking to immigrate, none.
You keep sticking up for them, either take some in or shut the hell up.
 
We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg
Then how many are you sponsoring?
As I have no family seeking to immigrate, none.
You keep sticking up for them, either take some in or shut the hell up.
LOLOLOL

As if I take orders from you. :rolleyes:

:fu:
 
Well, if a guy who has no vocation, income, home, or means of supporting himself is in favor of Trump, then, obviously, we all should change our votes!
 
Last edited:
A nutjob, people where screened and very often rejected coming through Ellis island. They weren't running across the border:slap:
You said...
the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?
You were talking about folks being brought in by the government, not illegals sneaking across the border, when you said that.

The famous sonnet I posted spits on your idiocy and accepts people [legally] from anywhere on Earth, regardless of how poor they are or how little they "benefit this country."


Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


Upon arrival at Ellis Island, immigrants were ushered into a room called the Great Hall and paraded before a series of medical officers for physical inspection. Most were allowed to pass by in a matter of seconds, but those whom the doctors deemed physically or mentally deficient were marked with chalk and taken away for additional screening. Questionable candidates were forced to submit to more detailed questioning and medical exams, and any signs of contagious disease, poor physique, feeblemindedness or insanity could see an immigrant denied admittance on the grounds that they were likely to become a ward of the state.
9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



We don't need anymore poor, unskilled, people, coming in here receiving government assistance this isn't the turn of the 20th century..."America first" we're broke
 
You said...
You were talking about folks being brought in by the government, not illegals sneaking across the border, when you said that.

The famous sonnet I posted spits on your idiocy and accepts people [legally] from anywhere on Earth, regardless of how poor they are or how little they "benefit this country."


Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


Upon arrival at Ellis Island, immigrants were ushered into a room called the Great Hall and paraded before a series of medical officers for physical inspection. Most were allowed to pass by in a matter of seconds, but those whom the doctors deemed physically or mentally deficient were marked with chalk and taken away for additional screening. Questionable candidates were forced to submit to more detailed questioning and medical exams, and any signs of contagious disease, poor physique, feeblemindedness or insanity could see an immigrant denied admittance on the grounds that they were likely to become a ward of the state.
9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



We don't need anymore poor, unskilled, people, coming in here receiving government assistance this isn't the turn of the 20th century..."America first" we're broke
Irrelevant. America still welcomes poor folks from all over the world. Do I need to post that sonnet from the Statue of Liberty again?
 
You said...
You were talking about folks being brought in by the government, not illegals sneaking across the border, when you said that.

The famous sonnet I posted spits on your idiocy and accepts people [legally] from anywhere on Earth, regardless of how poor they are or how little they "benefit this country."


Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


Upon arrival at Ellis Island, immigrants were ushered into a room called the Great Hall and paraded before a series of medical officers for physical inspection. Most were allowed to pass by in a matter of seconds, but those whom the doctors deemed physically or mentally deficient were marked with chalk and taken away for additional screening. Questionable candidates were forced to submit to more detailed questioning and medical exams, and any signs of contagious disease, poor physique, feeblemindedness or insanity could see an immigrant denied admittance on the grounds that they were likely to become a ward of the state.
9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



We don't need anymore poor, unskilled, people, coming in here receiving government assistance this isn't the turn of the 20th century..."America first" we're broke

Absolutely! 'Merica is for 'Merica bums!
 
Hey nutjob, the federal government is allowing illegals to run across the border..We never accepted people without condition you idiot:slap:


9 Things You May Not Know About Ellis Island - History in the Headlines

We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



We don't need anymore poor, unskilled, people, coming in here receiving government assistance this isn't the turn of the 20th century..."America first" we're broke
Irrelevant. America still welcomes poor folks from all over the world. Do I need to post that sonnet from the Statue of Liberty again?
nobody has a right to come here ...Get that fact through your head...A quote from a poet is meaningless:slap:
 
Well, if a guy who has no vocation, income, home, or means of supporting himself is in favor of Trump, then, obviously, we all should change our votes!

It would be a good start if you didn't beat homeless guys over their political opinions.
 
Well, if a guy who has no vocation, income, home, or means of supporting himself is in favor of Trump, then, obviously, we all should change our votes!

It would be a good start if you didn't beat homeless guys over their political opinions.

The latest homeless poll shows that 59% of them favor Trump. However, the statistic sample has a pretty wide margin of error, because only 6% of them vote, and 92% of those polled did not respond to the questionnaire because they did not have a mailbox.
 
We never denied them legal entrance because they were poor or did not "benefit this country."

There were no government benefits for them. Understand? they had to work
No, they didn't have to work. They had to be sponsored. If they didn't work, their sponsor was responsible for them.

Still, no matter how poor they were, that alone was never a reason to deny them entrance. This time, read it for clarity ....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



We don't need anymore poor, unskilled, people, coming in here receiving government assistance this isn't the turn of the 20th century..."America first" we're broke
Irrelevant. America still welcomes poor folks from all over the world. Do I need to post that sonnet from the Statue of Liberty again?
nobody has a right to come here ...Get that fact through your head...A quote from a poet is meaningless:slap:
Utter nonsense. We extend open arms to folks from all over the world. What a pity the symbolism behind the Statue of Liberty is wasted on you. Thankfully for me and my family, it meant something to those who greeted my ancestors who came to the U.S. more than 100 years ago.
 
the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?

So no immigration for poor people?

That would send a lovely message to this countries downtrodden and homeless.


That they come before the poor and downtrodden of other nations?
 


Be armed before disagreeing with their garbage opinions. Clinton is the criminal candidate for the criminals.
 
These are Obama,'s homeless, Trumps plan: America first, we don't need to be shipping in other countries poor people to take care of :thup:

So having the government regulate the competitive labor market is going to help the homeless?

Somehow I doubt it.


Can you read? the federal government should only bring in people who benefit this country, not other countries poor, who get on the government dole...Understand?


This analysis shows that legal immigrant households make extensive use of most welfare programs, while illegal immigrant households primarily benefit from food programs and Medicaid through their U.S.-born children. Low levels of education — not legal status — is the main reason immigrant welfare use is high.

Among the findings:

  • An estimated 49 percent of households headed by legal immigrants used one or more welfare programs in 2012, compared to 30 percent of households headed by natives.

  • Households headed by legal immigrants have higher use rates than native households overall and for cash programs (14 percent vs. 10 percent), food programs (36 percent vs. 22 percent), and Medicaid (39 percent vs. 23 percent). Use of housing programs is similar.

  • Legal immigrant households account for three-quarters of all immigrant households accessing one or more welfare programs.

  • Less-educated legal immigrants make extensive use of every type of welfare program, including cash, food, Medicaid, and housing.

  • The overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants have modest levels of education; therefore, the high use of welfare associated with less-educated legal immigrants indicates that legalization would likely increase welfare costs, particularly for cash and housing programs.
Welfare Use by Legal and Illegal Immigrant Households
You're fucking deranged.....

Within the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.....

6358348383447222951298058486_large_img_line14-3.jpg



THis is how it goes.


Lefties posts "poor huddled masses meme"


I point out that their message strongly implies support for an open border and unlimited immigration.


THey dishonestly deny that.

After several dozens pages, I get them to admit that the US has a finite ability to absorb immigrants.

Then they call me a racist, and let the matter drop.


The next day they pretend to forget that their position was debunked and they go back to spouting their silly talking points.
 
And with the Demographic change almost certainly leading to a defacto ONe Party State run by the dems, this is the future for ALL OF US.

All you're moping about is losing the defacto ONe Party State you had.
 
And with the Demographic change almost certainly leading to a defacto ONe Party State run by the dems, this is the future for ALL OF US.

All you're moping about is losing the defacto ONe Party State you had.



1. There has been no such period of REpublican dominance.

2. The republican party was never about such thuggery, so even if there was, it would not have led to the Hell that Democratic Dominance would.
 
And with the Demographic change almost certainly leading to a defacto ONe Party State run by the dems, this is the future for ALL OF US.

All you're moping about is losing the defacto ONe Party State you had.



1. There has been no such period of REpublican dominance.

2. The republican party was never about such thuggery, so even if there was, it would not have led to the Hell that Democratic Dominance would.

I'm referring to while male dominance. Fine with me if you want to hate ~half of the citizenry, and the power structure thrives on it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top