Homeland Security Looking at Taking Over Election

Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
 
Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
 
Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
Notify Obama.
 
Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
Notify Obama.
Do you simply believe anything published by the RW media? Seriously? The federal government is not trying to take over elections. Everyone from the far right to the far left and everyone in between would successfully file suit and win because the constitution is unambiguous about how elections should be run. As much as these scare stories have been totally wrong in the past you would think some of you people would develop a little critical thinking skills about shit you read.
 
Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
Notify Obama.
Do you simply believe anything published by the RW media? Seriously? The federal government is not trying to take over elections. Everyone from the far right to the far left and everyone in between would successfully file suit and win because the constitution is unambiguous about how elections should be run. As much as these scare stories have been totally wrong in the past you would think some of you people would develop a little critical thinking skills about shit you read.
Funny how the left scream the government is murdering people yet trust them with everything.
 
Having our election system declared vital infrastructure is not taking over the election. At most it would mean the creation of a special unit to investigate foreign threats to various systems.
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
Notify Obama.
Do you simply believe anything published by the RW media? Seriously? The federal government is not trying to take over elections. Everyone from the far right to the far left and everyone in between would successfully file suit and win because the constitution is unambiguous about how elections should be run. As much as these scare stories have been totally wrong in the past you would think some of you people would develop a little critical thinking skills about shit you read.
Funny how the left scream the government is murdering people yet trust them with everything.
This is not a matter of trusting the government. You are suggesting something it could not do under any circumstances short of a new amendment to the constitution. Do you actually think the states would submit to something like this? Do you think half the country would not sue? Do you actually think the supreme court would allow it? Jesus, sometimes it's like trying to convince toddlers there is no monster in the closet. There are certainly things to worry about the federal government but this is not one of them.
 
Just a master control computer system run by DC.

No way the system can be rigged.
Negative, elections are administered by the states. No central federal control is possible as it would be unconstitutional.
Notify Obama.
Do you simply believe anything published by the RW media? Seriously? The federal government is not trying to take over elections. Everyone from the far right to the far left and everyone in between would successfully file suit and win because the constitution is unambiguous about how elections should be run. As much as these scare stories have been totally wrong in the past you would think some of you people would develop a little critical thinking skills about shit you read.
Funny how the left scream the government is murdering people yet trust them with everything.
This is not a matter of trusting the government. You are suggesting something it could not do under any circumstances short of a new amendment to the constitution. Do you actually think the states would submit to something like this? Do you think half the country would not sue? Do you actually think the supreme court would allow it? Jesus, sometimes it's like trying to convince toddlers there is no monster in the closet. There are certainly things to worry about the federal government but this is not one of them.
A centralized election system run by the Federal government. What could possibly go wrong?
 

Forum List

Back
Top