SniperFire
Senior Member
"We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy."
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy."
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
The Messiah is in a little trouble here, the CBO, and host of others have run the numbers, guess what, the only solution is to expand the tax base, which includes those earning $48,000 plus, other wise known as an across the board tax increase which will have a major impact on consumer based economies. The dog will continue to chase it's tail because he has no other choice.
The Messiah is in a little trouble here, the CBO, and host of others have run the numbers, guess what, the only solution is to expand the tax base, which includes those earning $48,000 plus, other wise known as an across the board tax increase which will have a major impact on consumer based economies. The dog will continue to chase it's tail because he has no other choice.
Of course. They have to let the tax cuts expire for everyone.
There aren't enough rich out there. The revenue is in the middle class.
Of course Those Clowns in Congress will spend all that new revenue just as quickly as they get it.
If anyone is looking for any meaningful spending cuts don't hold your breath.
"We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy."
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
"We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy."
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
The 'fiscal cliff' has an upside, even though it will ruin Obama's second term agenda.
oh wait
That is an upside as well.
"We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy."
- President Hussein, holding middle class hostage
LOL
the president wants to set up a horse shoe shaped perimeter and run all the rich people into it and make targets out of them. zero uses a vietnam tactic to nail the rich.
The Messiah is in a little trouble here, the CBO, and host of others have run the numbers, guess what, the only solution is to expand the tax base, which includes those earning $48,000 plus, other wise known as an across the board tax increase which will have a major impact on consumer based economies. The dog will continue to chase it's tail because he has no other choice.
The Messiah is in a little trouble here, the CBO, and host of others have run the numbers, guess what, the only solution is to expand the tax base, which includes those earning $48,000 plus, other wise known as an across the board tax increase which will have a major impact on consumer based economies. The dog will continue to chase it's tail because he has no other choice.
But thirty years off flat wages hasn't hurt our consumer based economics?
Who determines wages?
Below is a chart that illustrated exactly how flat wages have been in Real Dollars (constant 1982 dollars).
As noted, there is a line tracking nominal wages, which are wages that do not include any inflation. The second line is wages in Real Dollars (constant 1982-1984 dollars), which include all inflation. Real Dollars are the format the Department of Labor has used for decades to measure real wage growth.
If one needs more information regarding Real Dollars go to: Historical Income Tables - Current versus Constant (or Real) Dollars - U.S Census Bureau
Again, who determines wages?
There's a lot of Single Cause Fallacy going around on this forum.
We had higher tax rates on everyone during Clinton's administration and a booming economy that created over 20 million jobs at the same time.
We had lower taxes during Bush, and only 3 million new jobs, followed by a horrendous crash.
So tax rates are not the sole determinant of a healthy economy. Predicting doom and gloom or orgiastic good times based just on whether or not a few people pay a little more or a little less in taxes is stupid.
.
Everyone knows we need to cut the budget. Our current spending is not sustainable. No one wants to decide what cut's to make. Let's go over tne cliff and those choices will be made for us. Sequestration is the answer to piss poor politicians.
The Messiah is in a little trouble here, the CBO, and host of others have run the numbers, guess what, the only solution is to expand the tax base, which includes those earning $48,000 plus, other wise known as an across the board tax increase which will have a major impact on consumer based economies. The dog will continue to chase it's tail because he has no other choice.
But thirty years off flat wages hasn't hurt our consumer based economics?
Who determines wages?
Below is a chart that illustrated exactly how flat wages have been in Real Dollars (constant 1982 dollars).
As noted, there is a line tracking nominal wages, which are wages that do not include any inflation. The second line is wages in Real Dollars (constant 1982-1984 dollars), which include all inflation. Real Dollars are the format the Department of Labor has used for decades to measure real wage growth.
If one needs more information regarding Real Dollars go to: Historical Income Tables - Current versus Constant (or Real) Dollars - U.S Census Bureau
Again, who determines wages?
The 'fiscal cliff' has an upside, even though it will ruin Obama's second term agenda.
oh wait
That is an upside as well.
If we go over the cliff, the majority of Americans will blame John Boehner, not Obama.
.