Holder begin to focus on the threat americans pose

[Mr.Fitnah]

Attorney General's Blunt Warning on Terror Attacks
AG Eric Holder Says 'Terrorists Only Have to Be Successful Once'

Attorney General Eric Holder has an urgent message for Americans: While he is confident that the United States will continue to thwart attacks, "the terrorists only have to be successful once."

And while it is not certain we will be hit, the American people, he told ABC News, "have to be prepared for potentially bad news."

"What I am trying to do in this interview is to make people aware of the fact that the threat is real, the threat is different, the threat is constant," he said.

Attorney General Eric Holder's Blunt Warning on Terror Attacks - ABC News
Put that together with what he said here


'The court has really struck down every government effort to try to regulate it. We tried with regard to pornography. It is gonna be a difficult thing, but it seems to me that if we can come up with reasonable restrictions, reasonable regulations in how people interact on the Internet, that is something that the Supreme Court and the courts ought to favorably look at.'

Eric Holder Wants to Censor the Internet Video

If you think Net neutrality is about streaming video you are in for a rude awakening or perhaps you will be pleased when certain voices are silenced

 

[Intense]

Such a different tune from what they were playing all through the Bush years.

 

[blastoff]

Such a different tune from what they were playing all through the Bush years.

Yep. Proving once again it's easy to complain from the sidelines but quite different when you're in the game with a lot of responsibility riding on your actions.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Day and night , got to please the useful idiots.

 

[Two Thumbs]

So censorship is ok as long as we are censoring things liberals don't like.

Awesome.

FYI; sites like USMB would have to pass thier test. And since many of the mods are conservative, we aren't censored for our language and anything can be posted...

USMB could be shut down.

While shit like Salon.com, a far left site, gets a pass.

 

[Granny]

From what I heard on the news this morning a very new tactic is putting biological toxins into the foods on salad bars in restaurants. Not very spectacular in scope but it's like playing Russian roulette with your food. One person chooses one item, their spouse and/or children each choose something different - and one of them dies.

 

[Intense]

So censorship is ok as long as we are censoring things liberals don't like.

Awesome.

FYI; sites like USMB would have to pass thier test. And since many of the mods are conservative, we aren't censored for our language and anything can be posted...

USMB could be shut down.

While shit like Salon.com, a far left site, gets a pass.

Wrong conclusion. We are not celebrating Hypocrisy, just pointing it out. I advocate Free Speech.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

I m concerned that they are creeping towards some ominous UN resolutions.

Defamation of religion is an issue that has been repeatedly addressed by the United Nations (UN) since 1999. Several non-binding resolutions have been voted on and accepted by the UN condemning "defamation of religion." The motions, sponsored on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference[1], aim to prohibit expression that would, "fuel discrimination, extremism and misperception leading to polarization and fragmentation with dangerous unintended and unforeseen consequences." Islamic states have expressed concerns that Islam is sometimes associated with terrorism and human rights violations, especially after the attack on the twin towers, and argue that the resolutions are necessary to combat Islamophobia.[1][2] Religious groups, human rights activists, free-speech activists, and several countries in the West have condemned the resolutions arguing it amounts to an international blasphemy law.[3] Critics of the resolutions including human rights groups argue that they are used to politically strengthen domestic anti-blasphemy and religious defamation laws, which are used to imprison journalists, students and other peaceful political dissidents.[4][5]

Defamation of religions and the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Contumacious]

From what I heard on the news this morning a very new tactic is putting biological toxins into the foods on salad bars in restaurants. Not very spectacular in scope but it's like playing Russian roulette with your food. One person chooses one item, their spouse and/or children each choose something different - and one of them dies.

Hummmmmmm

Who benefits when the government attempts to instill fear in a population ?

.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Finally, Holder and I are in agreement.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Progressive lost their media monopoly so all their lies are exposed including who they really are and what they represent: state control of the American people. So how do they respond? But shutting down the only media outlet they don't control.

Fucking Nazi cocksuckers

 

[Two Thumbs]

So censorship is ok as long as we are censoring things liberals don't like.

Awesome.

FYI; sites like USMB would have to pass thier test. And since many of the mods are conservative, we aren't censored for our language and anything can be posted...

USMB could be shut down.

While shit like Salon.com, a far left site, gets a pass.

Wrong conclusion. We are not celebrating Hypocrisy, just pointing it out. I advocate Free Speech.

Of course. we both do. Ask anyone else and they will say the same thing.

Ask the power hungry controll freak DNC and they will consider shutting the USMB down b/c you don't pick and chose who gets front page. You guys do pick who gets the romper room ~snicker~. but there is no blatant pattern.

I was a member of Salon.com. Then the best way to be an Editor Pick, and get your post on the home page was to call the TEA a bunch of rasist or just ridicule FOX.

Places like that will thrive as places like this die off.

censorship for our own good.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

All Socialist/Communist Governments turn on their own People in the end. This current President has repeatedly declared War on his own people. 'Divide & Conquer.' It's the Democrat & "Community Organizer" way. It's all in Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They have to stir up contempt & discontent in order to successfully divide the People. That's what Democrat Class Warfare and endless Race Baiting are all about. I'm never surprised when i hear about these people mounting more attacks on American Citizens. The Socialists/Progressives are destroying our Nation. When will Americans wake up and stop them? Time's running out.

 

[Jeremy]

As long as they don't listen to phone calls from Somali Salami living in Minneapolis calling his buds in Yemen.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I thought we were only in danger because of Bush and Cheney?

 

[Revere]

Holder won't say "Islam." Peter King will.

Peter King: I'll Hold Hearings On Radical Islam

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Finally, Holder and I are in agreement.

So you got this is your sig line

STOP THE NET. NAZIS! END THE FASCIST CENSORSHIP COMMISSION!

and you agree with holder that the internet needs to be censored and now the FDC is doing it despite being told by ther courts they cannot ?

Looks like you owned yourself.

 

[Jeremy]

Finally, Holder and I are in agreement.

So you got this is your sig line

STOP THE NET. NAZIS! END THE FASCIST CENSORSHIP COMMISSION!

and you agree with holder that the internet needs to be censored and now the FDC is doing it despite being told by ther courts they cannot ?

Looks like you owned yourself.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Finally, Holder and I are in agreement.

So you got this is your sig line

STOP THE NET. NAZIS! END THE FASCIST CENSORSHIP COMMISSION!

and you agree with holder that the internet needs to be censored and now the FDC is doing it despite being told by ther courts they cannot ?

Looks like you owned yourself.

Where are your meds?

I NEVER said I agree with holder regarding the internet, just bout the threat homegrown terrorists and their sleeper cells pose, and the covert stings they're using to catch them.

Looks like you need to actually LOOK next time.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is the same Administration that called US Veterans "Right wing extremists" right?