Hoaxters claim penis causes climate change passed peer review to prove a point

Discussion in 'Environment' started by polarbear, May 24, 2017.

  1. polarbear
    Offline

    polarbear I eat morons

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,938
    Thanks Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +734
    I already know how the warmers will dog pile this OP which shows how even the most ridiculous claims about climate change passes peer review and gets published as long as the paper includes enough left wing jargon and buzzwords.
    There is no point arguing over the URL I picked so that readers can read the entire hoax, because Google comes up with 377 000 hits & URLs referring to this hoax.
    I stumbled on it this morning while I was reading the European news papers.
    So then, eeny meeny miny moe lets pick this one, because it bugs the people on my ignore list the most:
    Hilarious Peer Reviewed Climate Hoax: “The conceptual penis as a social construct”
    Climate change is driven by nothing more than it is by certain damaging themes in hypermasculinity that can be best understood via the dominant rapacious approach to climate ecology identifiable with the conceptual penis. Our planet is rapidly approaching the much-warned-about 2°C climate change threshold, and due to patriarchal power dynamics that maintain present capitalist structures, especially with regard to the fossil fuel industry, the connection between hypermasculine dominance of scientific, political, and economic discourses and the irreparable damage to our ecosystem is made clear.”
     
  2. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,860
    Thanks Received:
    1,127
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,728
    Yah, I saw this a few days ago on WUWT or something. The really funny part is that there is a computer program out there that bloviates your talking points into jargon that is sure to please peer review.

    It is insane how far the scientific method has fallen, and how so many of these hoaxes can get through.
     
  3. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    4,102
    Thanks Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +942
    Finally! My dick is getting recognition. Does this give a whole new meaning of fucking up the everything, the worldwide?
     
  4. mamooth
    Offline

    mamooth Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    17,765
    Thanks Received:
    3,097
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Ratings:
    +10,620
    Check it out. A couple of our most fanatical pseudoscience cultists are pushing a fraud again. What a surprise.

    What the fraud-pushing authors of that "hoax" failed to mention was that, first, they submitted the article to a reputable journal, and it was rejected. Dang. What to do? After all, they were getting paid to create anti-science propaganda. "Our paper was rejected" isn't going to get them a paycheck.

    The solution? They submitted it again to a predatory pay-to-publish journal. Hand them $1350, and that journal will publish anything. So they did, and then conveniently forgot to mention they used a pay-to-publish journal.

    Ian and PolarBear both fell hard for the scam. It told them what they wanted to hear, so they turned off their brains and BELIEVED, same as they always do.

    Ian, PolarBear, do you have any regrets at all about pushing this fraud, or do you only regret getting caught?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    4,102
    Thanks Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +942
    Do you mean taking away people's beliefs? If they stop believing in their dicks then what will be of them? A bunch of gay pussies?
     
  6. Old Rocks
    Online

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    53,705
    Thanks Received:
    6,396
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +14,934
    Cogent Social Sciences? You and WUWT consider that to be a peer reviewed scientific journal? Come on, Polar, you know better than that.

    Show me some real articles from real scientific journals, not shit from pay for publication shit journals. But you won't, because what you find in the real journals states that AGW is real, and already having negative affects on us.
     
  7. Muhammed
    Offline

    Muhammed Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,190
    Thanks Received:
    1,389
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    North Coast USA
    Ratings:
    +6,692
    Sounds like you've been fooled by the climategate fraudsters. Sucker!
     
  8. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,860
    Thanks Received:
    1,127
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,728

    WUWT and others posted up this story of yet another hoax being published in a peer reviewed Journal to point out the absurdity, and give everyone a good laugh.

    Old Rocks doesn't grok the irony that all the Berkeley Earth BEST papers were also released in a pay-to-publish Journal. As usual his double standards are in full view.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. polarbear
    Offline

    polarbear I eat morons

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,938
    Thanks Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +734
    Fact is that when a speech by Christiana Figueres invoking the goddess Ixchel is approved by the IPCC conference it would not have mattered to them if she wove the words of the hoaxters into her "tapestry" as she put it:
    [​IMG]
    Climate change is driven via the dominant rapacious approach to climate ecology identifiable with the conceptual penis. especially with regard to the fossil fuel industry, the connection between hypermasculine dominance of scientific, political, and economic discourses and the irreparable damage to our ecosystem is made clear.”

    It fits right in at that part of her speech:
    “Excellencies, the goddess Ixchel would probably tell you that a tapestry is the result of the skillful interlacing of many threads. I am convinced that 20 years from now, we will admire the policy tapestry that you have woven together and think back fondly to Cancun and the inspiration of Ixchel making us aware that there is a correlation between the conceptual penis and the hypermasculine dominance of the fossil fuel industry.

    And shortly after that Al Gore would have volunteered for a sex change to set an example which is today pretty well thee guiding principle for campus group think.
    Very likely it was this liberal dominated campus group think which inspired this hoax to begin with
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. mamooth
    Offline

    mamooth Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    17,765
    Thanks Received:
    3,097
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Ratings:
    +10,620
    No, they pushed a fraud by pretending a pay-to-publish journal was "peer-reviewed". And you know that, but you're choosing to lie about it.

    Based on your history here, anything you post should always initially be assumed to be fraudulent, as it nearly always is. You only parrot propaganda from denier fraud blogs, and you make it a point of pride to refuse to look at any actual science.

    Now, as your propensity for fraud has been exposed again, you'll need to deflect with your usual poo-flinging antics. Please proceed.
     

Share This Page