Hitler's Genocide and revisionism

Discussion in 'Education' started by proletarian, Dec 20, 2009.

  1. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    THIS THREAD IS NOT FOR DEBATING EITHER THE EXISTENCE OR THE EXTENT OF ATROCITIES COMMITTED BY THE NAZIS OR ANY OTHER PARTY. THIS IS FOR DISCUSSING THE VALIDITY OF HISTORICAL ACCURACY AND REACTIONS TO REVISIONISM.




    What this thread is about is this question: why is it that while it's acceptable to revise our understanding of history in the name of truth and accuracy when adding Troy to the map, studying human migration, or discussing almost anything else, WW2 and the associated atrocities are taboo? Why is any questioning of the means of slaughter used in any given location, the time-line, or the total number of persons massacred met with with such anger? Is it not important to remember the atrocities of the past accurately? If the numbers on record are not accurate, isn't it right to correct them? Inflated numbers seem to devalue the persons massacred, implying that their deaths are less of a tragedy is there are less of them, while if the numbers are too low, it minimalizes the crimes committed and seems to treat some of the people murdered as not worthy of counting.

    Why is there such a strong knee-jerk emotional reaction to anyone who questions the details?
     
  2. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    Its not 'taboo.'

    There is nothing to revise, those that currently attempt are trying to erase the greatest crime in history.

    No matter how many times its gone through, from the nazis own records or the fact that 6 million people vanished that were not in military service between 1933 and 1945 a number of people still try to insist it didn't happen.

    Some morons on this site are into that, and even encourage people to rep them for it, astounding as that is Buekema.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  3. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I find that statement dishonest. There are deniers, yes, but there are alos people who know that atrocities occurred ans imply want to ensure the record is accurate.

    Again, I find it dishonest to equate revisionism with denial.
     
  4. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    The Jews have a vested monetary interest in keeping the so called Holocaust unexamined and unquestioned.

    They continually reinforce the holocaust story with Holocaust Museums in almost every city in the world.

    The Holohoax myth has become a huge cash cow for the Zionist who control the Holocaust Industry.

    They make sure the official story is considered sacred in acedemia and among government officials.

    The Jews have their own zionist gestapo to vilify and slander anyone who dares ask questions.

    As people have found out;

    To question any aspect of the holocaust is political and academic suicide.
     
  5. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    ^ There is your dishonesty Beukema.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    Bingo.
    No one is denying legitimate scholarly work on the subject. And no one has been denied access to records.
    But the topic regularly becomes a lightning rod for anti-semites, like SunniMan and his disturbed fellow travelers. Somehow they feel that minimizing the number of people killed, or their treatment will erase any moral high ground Jews have. It will not, of course, except in their own twisted minds.
    The Holocaust remains probably the best-attested event in history, with records, photos, movies, eye witness accounts etc that fill libraries and all tell remarkably similar and consistent stories. Thus attempts to re-write that story are prima facie evidence of anti semitism and Jew hatred.
     
  7. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    :eusa_eh:
     
  8. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    This is the reason scholars and historians are afraid to examine details of the holocaust.

    If they did find a flaw to any aspect of the official holocaust story and published it.

    Their careers would be ruined and they would be labeled as an anti-semite and a nazi sympathizer.
     
  9. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    Not unless they were actually anti-semites and nazi sympathizers. But please find me a scholar who found a flaw with the official story and publishjed it. And I dont mean the nudnicks you people regularly mention.
     
  10. JW Frogen
    Offline

    JW Frogen Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    6,165
    Thanks Received:
    1,167
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,206
    Oh for fuck sake!

    Hitler did it!

    He did it!

    He caused it, cheered it on, and wanted it. His minions worked for him. They were not freelancing.

    He did it.

    So did Charles Manson.

    He did it.

    OJ too.
     

Share This Page