Hitler Demands Churchill’s Arrest!

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Flanders, Sep 20, 2012.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,541
    Thanks Received:
    631
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,575
    Those voices calling for limits on free speech in the name of world peace are really trying to prevent revolutions. Unchecked religions and governments are murderous by nature because they nurture the same personality types. Islam is a murderous, brutal, religion not much different than India’s Thuggees of old. Totalitarian governments are no different than Supreme Deity theocracies when it comes to killing their own people; so it is no great surprise they fear revolution.

    Even if those who would put limits on speech are sincere about ending war they apparently do not understand that war dotted mankind’s résumé long before freedom of speech was ever codified. If world peace is the true goal the question is “Does free speech prevent or encourage war?” While you wrestle with that one, here’s an easy one “Does free speech prevent or encourage revolution?” Before you tackle the second question consider the benefits mankind got from the American Revolution, and the horrors Communist revolutions gave the world.

    Note that dictators in Libya and Egypt had no expansionist capabilities, yet they were overthrown, while no one is saying overthrow expansionist governments and religions. Iran is an exception only because it wants to go nuclear. That clown at the United Nations wants to protect them all:


    Apparently, the clown in the White House agrees:

    U.N. chief: Free speech has limits
    'Fundamental right should not be abused by such disgraceful, such shameful acts'
    Published: 8 hours ago
    by STEWART STOGEL

    U.N. chief: Free speech has limits

    Clowns never understand that protecting religion from free speech will encourage more brutality and killing; so it’s hard for most Americans to see how abolishing freedom of speech guarantees world peace. Frankly, I’d rather abolish the United Nations.

    Winston Churchill would have been arrested had Hitler gone to the League of Nations and demanded that fascism not be criticized.

    If Muslims want world peace all they have to do is end the war they started.

    The subliminal threat does not work. A billion offers more targets.

    Jihad is the only threat to world peace I can see.

    Self-defense is always a tangible benefit.

    Can anyone tell me why Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Qandil is better than Hosni Mubarak?

    Top Muslim calls for U.N. to end free speech
    Claims violence over film proof constitutional protection 'benefits no one'
    by DREW ZAHN

    Top Muslim calls for U.N. to end free speech

    I’d like to know if Secretary of State Clinton ever considered inserting our First Amendment in her revised version.

    And aside from Hussein & Company, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Communist revolutionaries, who the hell wants to strengthen democracy?

    Now here’s the bad news:


     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2012
  2. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,328
    Thanks Received:
    12,693
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,762
    :rolleyes:

    The UN can't amend our constitution.
     
  3. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,541
    Thanks Received:
    631
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,575
    To Ravi: UN-loving traitors in our own government repeatedly amended our Constitution for the United Nations without bothering with an Amendment ratified by the American people.

    If the issue concerns you how about commenting on Congress and the president amending the Constitution on their own. This link is in the OP, but you apparently chose to ignore it:


     

Share This Page