Hitler actually deregulated guns

Try reading The Federalist Papers for insight into the Constitution.

The Federalist Papers are interesting, but only letters to the editior with the opinions of the writers. The amendments are law.

Your an idiot. They were made and published so the American people could see the discussion.

They were letters to the editior by three authors, under assumed names. They were a form of propaganda to convince people that the Constituton should be ratified. Perhaps the letters have more impact today than during the ratification fight. They are interesting because of the authors views and as history but have no legal force. Perhaps the "Pennsylvania Packet" had as much impact in that it helped lead to the Bill of Rights.
 
Is Salon saying that Hitler didn't disarm civilians? How far will the left go to distort history? It's easy when you are dealing with union educated libs who can type in upper case letters and cut and paste but not much else.
 
Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone’s guns is mostly bogus.

Speaking of bogus, it took 5 or 6 paragraphs of blather just to get to this claim. The 'conservative' claim has never been that Hitler confiscated all guns.
 
Is Salon saying that Hitler didn't disarm civilians? How far will the left go to distort history? It's easy when you are dealing with union educated libs who can type in upper case letters and cut and paste but not much else.

Large letters really make the point sink in.



Btw, who said "Those that fail to learn from history tend to repeat it"?
 
Obama fosters a feeling of lawlessness and lack of trust in government and he wonders why so many people are starting to pop off in public.

Well, he's not wondering one bit. He needs a revolution.
 
nazi-weapon-law-of-1938_zps763d4ca7.jpg
 
Alinsky writes:

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoyevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system, among not only the middle class but the 40 per cent of American families – more than seventy million people – whose income range from $5,000 to $10,000 a year [in 1971]. They cannot be dismissed by labeling them blue collar or hard hat. They will not continue to be relatively passive and slightly challenging. If we fail to communicate with them, if we don't encourage them to form alliances with us, they will move to the right. Maybe they will anyway, but let's not let it happen by default.[2]​

Rules for Radicals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.

:clap2:
 
Alinsky writes:

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoyevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system, among not only the middle class but the 40 per cent of American families – more than seventy million people – whose income range from $5,000 to $10,000 a year [in 1971]. They cannot be dismissed by labeling them blue collar or hard hat. They will not continue to be relatively passive and slightly challenging. If we fail to communicate with them, if we don't encourage them to form alliances with us, they will move to the right. Maybe they will anyway, but let's not let it happen by default.[2]​

Rules for Radicals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and most of the sheep happily go along with it and spread stupid stuff like this thread...they are called, useful tools

they were bragging Obama scored a victory with 7.8 %...how sad is that
 
Last edited:
For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting whatever he believed to be wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don’t have the power to change a situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."

Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a "mass army" that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."[2]​

Rules for Radicals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Does the left really want to go down that road? During WW2 the Allies (US) manufactured a cheap handgun called the "Liberator" to drop to civilians in Germany and areas that were occupied by Nazis. The joke was that the cheap weapon took longer to load than it took to manufacture but it shot a potent .45 round. The theory was that these belly guns could be used to obtain a real weapon.
 
Next they will be saying Hitler didn't gas jews

some damn sick people around
 
Does the left really want to go down that road? During WW2 the Allies (US) manufactured a cheap handgun called the "Liberator" to drop to civilians in Germany and areas that were occupied by Nazis. The joke was that the cheap weapon took longer to load than it took to manufacture but it shot a potent .45 round. The theory was that these belly guns could be used to obtain a real weapon.

Obama has planted the seed in these liberal's minds that laws mean nothing. Now when it comes to abortion.....that's untouchable, but guns, even though it's in the constitution and the Supreme Court has ruled it to be against the law to take them, these libs now have hope from this Community Organizer that they can step all over our rights, maybe even kill us so they can get their way.
 
Last edited:
Is Salon saying that Hitler didn't disarm civilians? How far will the left go to distort history? It's easy when you are dealing with union educated libs who can type in upper case letters and cut and paste but not much else.

Facts are not exclusive to the left.

It was the fringe-right, Tea Bags, & Gun Cultists that brought the Hitler comparison in the conversation.

You understand the mainstream conservative are embarrassed by this. It's embarrassing for a mainstream conservative who supported Mitt Romney to face his neighbors. He's ashamed at what the fringe has done to his party, the part of Reagan. The one reasonable and compassionate party.

This is no longer a left/right issue, this is America verse a minority of gun extremists who refuse to even discuss reasonable measures-- measures that would not effect the majority of law-abiding gun owners in the least.

"union educated libs" -- do you even know what a brainwashed tool you are?
 
"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."

And Liberals defend it


You should be more worried about the folks who defend retards because you're gonna need someone to stick up for you some day.

would that be the same folks who stick up for you?....
 
Next they will be saying Hitler didn't gas jews

That's a fringe-right talking point. The bigoted anti-semites on the fringes of right are the ones who cling to Holocaust denial. Like the fringe-right asshole who shot up the Holocaust memorial museum in D.C. and killed a guard.
 
[

The reason for the 2nd Amendment is because government cannot be trusted. That is why the framers put it in the Constitution. Germany is a prime example of why you need a 2nd Amendment, but you're not smart enough to figure that out.

Germany had plenty of guns and Hitler actually relaxed the gun laws... and Hitler came to power anyway.

In fact, those Germans, who had plenty of guns until Ike took them away didn't rise up against Hitler. They fought for him to nearly the last man standing.

Fact of the matter is, the retarded "I needs my guns so I can fights the gummit" is pretty much retarded.

The government will always have bigger guns, more guns and will be better with them.
Did the Jews have guns in Nazi Germany? No.

What happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany? Hitler KILLED as many of them as he possibly could.

Lesson learned. Unarmed people are easy for a government to subjugate and KILL.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top