History Has A Way Of Saying "No" To Democrats

[Billy_Kinetta]

Interesting read.

WND » Original intent of ‘militia’ – not what liberals think » Print

 

[regent]

The beauty of our system is that while the liberal party has been around since Jefferson, the Conservative party has been dropped out of sight a couple of times in our history. And now it seems as if we might have still another new conservative party.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The beauty of our system is that while the liberal party has been around since Jefferson

What falls under that tag now is not liberal by classic definition.

 

[regent]

The beauty of our system is that while the liberal party has been around since Jefferson

What falls under that tag now is not liberal by classic definition.

So what is the classic definition of liberal, and your source?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The beauty of our system is that while the liberal party has been around since Jefferson

What falls under that tag now is not liberal by classic definition.

So what is the classic definition of liberal, and your source?

This will serve.

What Is Classical Liberalism?

 

[regent]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

 

[GreenBean]

The beauty of our system is that while the liberal party has been around since Jefferson, the Conservative party has been dropped out of sight a couple of times in our history. And now it seems as if we might have still another new conservative party.

Hey dumbass The Liberal Party was founded in 1944 .

 

[regent]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

See the next post.
Posters create their own definitions and their own histories. I prefer a little more academics when discussing both politics and history.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

See the next post.
Posters create their own definitions and their own histories.

In this case not.

I prefer a little more academics when discussing both politics and history.

Interesting, as we have yet to see that from your end.

 

[regent]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

See the next post.
Posters create their own definitions and their own histories.

In this case not.

I prefer a little more academics when discussing both politics and history.

Interesting, as we have yet to see that from your end.

I try to use academics for responses if I believe if I think the reader can understand the difference between an academic response and make-believe stuff.
I take it you do not trust academics.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

See the next post.
Posters create their own definitions and their own histories.

In this case not.

I prefer a little more academics when discussing both politics and history.

Interesting, as we have yet to see that from your end.

I try to use academics for responses if I believe if I think the reader can understand the difference between an academic response and make-believe stuff.

Bizarro Superman, eh? Or is it Opposites Day?

 

[regent]

OK back to liberalism as defined in the numerous college booklets sold in college bookstores and taught in college classes?

What's your point?

See the next post.
Posters create their own definitions and their own histories.

In this case not.

I prefer a little more academics when discussing both politics and history.

Interesting, as we have yet to see that from your end.

I try to use academics for responses if I believe if I think the reader can understand the difference between an academic response and make-believe stuff.

Bizarro Superman, eh? Or is it Opposites Day?

You made my point, thank you.