Historic speech at the UN:

[Roudy]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FWrQ7RXvWc&sns=em]L'armée d'Israël a sauvegardé les droits des civils en zone de combat - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Hossfly]

Knocks the legs from under George and Sherri's claims as well as the Islamic terrorist Hamas supporters, doesn't it?

 

[Roudy]

Knocks the legs from under George and Sherri's claims as well as the Islamic terrorist Hamas supporters, doesn't it?

sure does!

 

[emptystep]

Why is the closed caption in French?

 

[Hossfly]

Why is the closed caption in French?

French is an official UN language. Does it bother you that it is translatable to English and clears the Israelis?

 

[SAYIT]

L'armée d'Israël a sauvegardé les droits des civils en zone de combat - YouTube

Nice work, Roudy. It is tragic but very revealing that the UN needs a UN accredited NGO to monitor UN actions but such is its current situation. As former US Ambassador to the UN, Jeanne Kirpatrick noted:
"The United Nations hasn't really improved much in the years since I was there, and it hasn't really improved much at all with respect to Israel," said Kirkpatrick. She said that when she first began attending Security Council and General Assembly sessions as America's ambassador, "I was very deeply shocked by the simple anti-Semitism that pervaded the place." The anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment she was exposed to at the world body was "mysterious," and "very, very strange," she said.

"We need to speak out about the calumny spoken at the UN," she said, noting that in addition to condemning anti-Jewish hatred emanating from Arab countries, Western European nations, such as France, should be taken to task for failing to halt anti-Semitism at home."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...gIHQCg&usg=AFQjCNE5BPtQaMwUG5SgUXS0JMiNVRE4ow

 

[emptystep]

L'armée d'Israël a sauvegardé les droits des civils en zone de combat - YouTube

Nice work, Roudy. It is tragic but very revealing that the UN needs a UN accredited NGO to monitor UN actions but such is its current situation. As former US Ambassador to the UN, Jeanne Kirpatrick noted:
"The United Nations hasn't really improved much in the years since I was there, and it hasn't really improved much at all with respect to Israel," said Kirkpatrick. She said that when she first began attending Security Council and General Assembly sessions as America's ambassador, "I was very deeply shocked by the simple anti-Semitism that pervaded the place." The anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment she was exposed to at the world body was "mysterious," and "very, very strange," she said.

"We need to speak out about the calumny spoken at the UN," she said, noting that in addition to condemning anti-Jewish hatred emanating from Arab countries, Western European nations, such as France, should be taken to task for failing to halt anti-Semitism at home."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...gIHQCg&usg=AFQjCNE5BPtQaMwUG5SgUXS0JMiNVRE4ow

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

 

[SAYIT]

L'armée d'Israël a sauvegardé les droits des civils en zone de combat - YouTube

Nice work, Roudy. It is tragic but very revealing that the UN needs a UN accredited NGO to monitor UN actions but such is its current situation. As former US Ambassador to the UN, Jeanne Kirpatrick noted:
"The United Nations hasn't really improved much in the years since I was there, and it hasn't really improved much at all with respect to Israel," said Kirkpatrick. She said that when she first began attending Security Council and General Assembly sessions as America's ambassador, "I was very deeply shocked by the simple anti-Semitism that pervaded the place." The anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment she was exposed to at the world body was "mysterious," and "very, very strange," she said.

"We need to speak out about the calumny spoken at the UN," she said, noting that in addition to condemning anti-Jewish hatred emanating from Arab countries, Western European nations, such as France, should be taken to task for failing to halt anti-Semitism at home."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...gIHQCg&usg=AFQjCNE5BPtQaMwUG5SgUXS0JMiNVRE4ow

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Huh?

 

[emptystep]

Nice work, Roudy. It is tragic but very revealing that the UN needs a UN accredited NGO to monitor UN actions but such is its current situation. As former US Ambassador to the UN, Jeanne Kirpatrick noted:
"The United Nations hasn't really improved much in the years since I was there, and it hasn't really improved much at all with respect to Israel," said Kirkpatrick. She said that when she first began attending Security Council and General Assembly sessions as America's ambassador, "I was very deeply shocked by the simple anti-Semitism that pervaded the place." The anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment she was exposed to at the world body was "mysterious," and "very, very strange," she said.

"We need to speak out about the calumny spoken at the UN," she said, noting that in addition to condemning anti-Jewish hatred emanating from Arab countries, Western European nations, such as France, should be taken to task for failing to halt anti-Semitism at home."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...gIHQCg&usg=AFQjCNE5BPtQaMwUG5SgUXS0JMiNVRE4ow

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Huh?

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

 

[SAYIT]

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Huh?

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

 

[Hossfly]

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Huh?

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

I suspect the quote was from one of the Yoda's homilies.

 

[emptystep]

Huh?

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

'Historic speech at the UN' 'There can be only one' Dude, I can't spell any words smaller than that.

 

[SAYIT]

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

'Historic speech at the UN' 'There can be only one' Dude, I can't spell any words smaller than that.

Only be one what, Princess?

 

[Hossfly]

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

'Historic speech at the UN' 'There can be only one' Dude, I can't spell any words smaller than that.

More than one has occurred.

 

[emptystep]

Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

'Historic speech at the UN' 'There can be only one' Dude, I can't spell any words smaller than that.

More than one has occurred.

OK, now you confused me. More than one what?

 

[SAYIT]

'Historic speech at the UN' 'There can be only one' Dude, I can't spell any words smaller than that.

More than one has occurred.

OK, now you confused me. More than one what?

It's your quote, Princess, and you still haven't translated it.

 

[emptystep]

More than one has occurred.

OK, now you confused me. More than one what?

It's your quote, Princess, and you still haven't translated it.

Are you speaking literally or figuratively?

 

[SAYIT]

OK, now you confused me. More than one what?

It's your quote, Princess, and you still haven't translated it.

Are you speaking literally or figuratively?

Woo. I'll repost the discourse. See if you can figure out what you are being asked to clarify:

Quote: Originally Posted by emptystep
It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Quote: Originally Posted by SAYIT
Huh?

Quote: Originally Posted by emptystep
The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Quote: Originally Posted by SAYIT
Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

 

[emptystep]

It's your quote, Princess, and you still haven't translated it.

Are you speaking literally or figuratively?

Woo. I'll repost the discourse. See if you can figure out what you are being asked to clarify:

Quote: Originally Posted by emptystep
It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Quote: Originally Posted by SAYIT
Huh?

Quote: Originally Posted by emptystep
The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

Quote: Originally Posted by SAYIT
Stop being so cryptic and just say what you have to say, Princess. Who's the big fish you refer to and who is the small and how does it apply to this thread?

Can we go back to the part about the fish?

 

[Roudy]

It is not whether the UN is a good system. It is a big system and bigger fish always swallow smaller fish. It's only a matter of time.

Huh?

The nation states were many. The colony nations were fewer. The cold war was two. There can be only one. That's a quote from somewhere.

or as Jackie Mason says, "If you don't use it, you'll loose it"