Hillary's Image: Shattering the Grand Illusion

Mrs. M.

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Nov 2, 2015
739
393
940
broken-mirror-1208349.jpg


Hillary Clinton had one major hurdle to overcome in order to win the 2016 presidential race. Who she is. Her real image. The truth is after Benghazi - Mrs. Clinton became the most hated woman in America. "What does it matter?" .... became her legacy and solidified the image of a woman with a heart of stone. She desperately needed an image make over and that would require the grand illusion that at least "some" Americans would still support her bid to become the next president of the United States. Like the Devil she serves, she has overplayed her hand.

In April of 2015, The Daily Mail did an investigation about the illusion that Mrs. Clinton has been creating out of thin air, better known as cyber air. The results of that investigation were nothing short of astonishing:

2790CFB400000578-3038621-image-a-1_1429025530088.jpg



  • Two different online audit tools say no more than 44 per cent of Hillary's 3.6 million Twitter fans are real people who participate in the platform
  • The newly minted presidential candidate is fending off accusations that her Facebook page is full of fake 'likes'
  • Her Facebook fan base includes more people from Baghdad, Iraq than any US city
  • When she was secretary of state, her agency paid $630,000 to bulk up its Facebook likes, but pledged to stop after she left
Although Hillary Clinton boasts a robust 3.6 million Twitter followers, not even a vast right-wing conspiracy would be able to interact with 2 million of them.

According to two popular online measuring tools, no more than 44 per cent of her Twitter fan base consists of real people who are active in using the social media platform.

StatusPeople.com, the oldest publicly available Twitter-auditing tool, reports that 44 per cent of the former secretary of state's followers are 'good'; 15 per cent are 'fake'; and 41 per cent are 'inactive,' meaning that they never tweet or reply to any tweets.

Read more: More than 2 MILLION of Hillary Clinton's Twitter followers are fake or never tweet | Daily Mail Online

Both StatusPeople.com and TwitterAudit agree that only 44 percent of Clinton's followers can be verified. It is evident that part of Hillary Clinton's work during her time at the State Department was manufacturing an illusion meant to deceive the American people into believing she was "liked." The scandal of her buying "likes" from Facebook to the tune of $630,000 is apparently Mrs. Clinton's idea of a PR campaign. Buying likes from Facebook, paying people to make fake accounts in order to boost twitter numbers, hiring actors to appear at her DNC nomination. Connecting the dots we clearly see a pattern emerge. Little did Mrs. Clinton realize her "grand illusion would shatter," her spell would be broken, before she could make it to the White House!

In November of 2015, another story - this time by the Washington Examiner exposed Mrs. Clinton as having more fake twitter followers than all other Republican or Democrat Candidates.
Clinton has highest percentage of fake followers

Clinton has highest percentage of fake followers
An audit of Hillary Clinton's main Twitter feed, @HillaryClinton, shows that 41 percent of her followers are not real people, a far higher percentage of fake followers than all other Republican or Democratic candidates.
Clinton has highest percentage of fake followers
________________
Let's do the math, shall we? Donald J. Trump has 11.7 Million Twitter followers. That number has remained about the same since last year this time. Twitter audit confirms that Hillary had more fake followers than any other candidate late last year. Which means that even if Donald J. Trump's followers were 20% fake (rally photos prove this to be impossible) than he still has more than triple the followers Mrs. Clinton has managed to fabricate on twitter and face book.
________________
What to do? When the first Image Makeover fails, double down and appoint a "Task Force."

After the truth came out, Mrs. Clinton rolled out yet another grand illusion called, "Correct the Record." Correct the Record is nothing more than a reset button to do damage control for the internal bleeding that came out of her attempt to fix the numbers on Facebook, Twitter and polling. Mrs. Clinton's newest reset button has been no more effective than her reset button with Russia. Need I remind you that after the US - Russian reset button Mrs. Clinton essentially called for war against Russia and Syria with a no fly zone in her effort to "save lives." So let's take a look at her newest "reset strategy" to save her own non-existent "likable image."

Barrier Breakers 2016: A Project of Correct The Record – Correct The Record

Correct The Record will invest more than $1 million into Barrier Breakers 2016 activities, including the more than tripling of its digital operation to engage in online messaging both for Secretary Clinton and to push back against attackers on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram. Barrier Breakers 2016 is a project of Correct The Record and the brainchild of David Brock, and the task force will be overseen by President of Correct The Record Brad Woodhouse and Digital Director Benjamin Fischbein. The task force staff’s backgrounds are as diverse as the community they will be engaging with and include former reporters, bloggers, public affairs specialists, designers, Ready for Hillary alumni, and Hillary super fans who have led groups similar to those with which the task force will organize. - end quote

They did keep their word to triple their online activities. In November of 2015 Mrs. Clinton had 3.6 million followers (which includes those she fabricated out of thin air) and Donald J. Trump had approximately 11 million followers (today he has 11.6 million) on Twitter.

Less than one year later Mrs. Clinton's Twitter Account claims that she now has 9.11 million followers. That is right at triple what she had less than a year ago. Miracle or another Grand Illusion? It appears that Correct the Record has fulfilled their promise to Mrs. Clinton in tripling "Online Activity." The problem remains however, that a huge portion of Mrs. Clinton's followers do not post on Twitter, do not post on Facebook, do not watch you tube video's of her speeches and do not comment on her you tube videos. Neither do they do appear at her rallies. Where are these people? Where is the hard evidence that they exist?

I believe that Mrs. Clinton's Grand Illusion will be remembered as the DNC's Grand Delusion. They shouldn't have permitted Mrs. Clinton to steal the nomination from Sanders because her grand illusion has now been shattered. The American people do not believe her or the media that is spinning her web of deception.

Just yesterday Donald Trump's Gettysburg Speech was trending #1 on Twitter with 11,000 likes and 444 dislikes and approximately a half million viewers on youtube.

In contrast, Mrs. Clinton wasn't trending at all (and still isn't). Like her imaginary "twitter followers" and "facebook friends" she remains lost in the Shadow of Donald Trump and his Huge Following both on Twitter, Facebook, and rally turnout.

Mr. Trump's turnout in Tampa, Florida:
trump-train-rally-575x378.jpg


And Here is Hillary Clinton's supporter turnout in Tampa:
hillary-tampa.jpg


The rest of her followers are lost in Space (Cyber Space) or trapped somewhere in Baghdad.

Houston, we've got a problem...
 
Last edited:
She is indeed the second most despised presidential candidate in this election season.
 
JakeStarkey said:
She is indeed the second most despised presidential candidate in this election season.
Click to expand...
I disagree. I think people despise her more than Barack Obama at this point even though he has behaved as if he was the third candidate. The wicked are despised for their wickedness and Clinton's record of wickedness runs decades long in the memory of the American people.

Trump is loved by the American people because he has given them hope. You cannot give people something that you don't have. If Hillary Clinton makes her way to the oval office it will be a very dark time for America.
 
Last edited:
JakeStarkey said:
She is indeed the second most despised presidential candidate in this election season.
Click to expand...





No, she is the most despised in history. By far. It's amazing what having the MSM in your pocket will do for you.
 
Hillary Clinton is sleazier than Bill Clinton. They deserve each other. She should be in prison now. She is the most corrupt POTUS candidate I have ever witnessed. Her people will try to steal the election by what they do best -- lying, cheating and stealing. The people have to rally and defeat her or else it will be chaos and civil war in America. I will buy all the guns and ammo I can if Clinton gets elected. Barack Obama, the worst and weakest POTUS ever, divided this country and Hillary will finish the job if elected. There will people starving in the streets and they will form unruly mobs to riot and loot in the better neighborhoods and stores. They've already pillaged and plundered the poor ones. It will be the Apocalypse America.

theo2.jpg

theo3.jpg

theo4.jpg

theo5.jpg
 
The Alt Right and Far Right above will learn they cannot take power by lawful, peaceful means.

They should be aware that try in other ways will result in bad things for them.

The American electorate does not want you or your vision ruling this country and other Americans.

The answer, the only answer, you will get is, "No."
 
"Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton? Despising the Presidential hopeful has become a national pastime which unites millionsInstead like baseball, Hillary-hating has become one of those national pastimes which unite millions of white working class Americans were millions of them look at Trump as if he were Babe Ruth.

Ever since becoming the President’s wife, when husband Bill won his first term in office 23 years ago, her popularity has struggled."

Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton?

Hillary is a terrible person.
 
Alex. said:
"Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton? Despising the Presidential hopeful has become a national pastime which unites millionsInstead like baseball, Hillary-hating has become one of those national pastimes which unite millions of white working class Americans were millions of them look at Trump as if he were Babe Ruth.

Ever since becoming the President’s wife, when husband Bill won his first term in office 23 years ago, her popularity has struggled."

Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton?

Hillary is a terrible person.
Click to expand...
Yup, just not so terrible as donald.
 
JakeStarkey said:
Alex. said:
"Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton? Despising the Presidential hopeful has become a national pastime which unites millionsInstead like baseball, Hillary-hating has become one of those national pastimes which unite millions of white working class Americans were millions of them look at Trump as if he were Babe Ruth.

Ever since becoming the President’s wife, when husband Bill won his first term in office 23 years ago, her popularity has struggled."

Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton?

Hillary is a terrible person.
Click to expand...
Yup, just not so terrible as donald.
Click to expand...
^^^^
:lame2:
 
Alex. said:
JakeStarkey said:
Alex. said:
"Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton? Despising the Presidential hopeful has become a national pastime which unites millionsInstead like baseball, Hillary-hating has become one of those national pastimes which unite millions of white working class Americans were millions of them look at Trump as if he were Babe Ruth.

Ever since becoming the President’s wife, when husband Bill won his first term in office 23 years ago, her popularity has struggled."

Why do Americans hate Hillary Clinton?

Hillary is a terrible person.
Click to expand...
Yup, just not so terrible as donald.
Click to expand...
^^^^
:lame2:
Click to expand...
But much more than enough.
 
More people are more comfortable or resigned to being lied to. I don't know a lot of people willing to look at and acknowledge the real problems and solutions needed to correct govt and economic problems, much less "take the responsibility" to initiate and manage such reforms.

So given the two choice, of admitting the system is messed up and agreeing to take responsibility for corrections DIRECTLY
vs.
letting politicians tell you they can fix things through govt and keep footing the bill to taxpayers to pay in later generations

Most people I know either accept the latter,
willingly or unwillingly,
and don't really know how or have faith that there are ways the people
can take on the changes needed to do otherwise.

So people are either resigned or feel stuck.
Regardless what they think about Clinton.

the path of least resistance is to go along with the media image
that Clinton can say all the right things that people want to hear
while govt remains a mess. so at least that is a steady image to prop up.
while nothing changes, and we're still facing the same messes,
or more to come, to fix on our own. We'll be lucky if we can organize
and use the parties to help support promote solutions to these problems
that govt is not going to fix for us. The people within the parties who can
orchestrate corrections are the leaders who will rise to the top.
And the real diplomats and peacemakers who can work and unite
diverse people and groups will be the successful leaders, not the divisive politicians.
 
The fact is that our system, Emily, is that of a constitutional republic, means the voters' duties are to elect representatives.

If they elect poorly, that is on the voters.
 
Clinton was on top of the world with after the planned Trump Tapes release, but the Wikileaks of emails have derailed her. Just look at the headlines and worse is yet to come:
 
JakeStarkey said:
The fact is that our system, Emily, is that of a constitutional republic, means the voters' duties are to elect representatives.

If they elect poorly, that is on the voters.
Click to expand...

Yes and No JakeStarkey
Just because someone "gets elected"
DOES NOT GIVE THEM FREE REIGN
to pass and enforce "whatever policy" gets approved by majority rule by courts and congress.

The final check on govt is the people.
If we don't consent, we push for change.

The problem is we aren't HEARING each other's objections.
So we keep relying on "political parties" to BULLY when one side objects but the other side isn't accepting the correction.

The responsibility on people is MUCH MORE than just "who we vote for"

We must vote every day with our words, actions, MONEY, labor whatever policy we SUPPORT and invest in.

So if people like you keep ENFORCING the idea that govt can mandate health care policies
against the will and consent of taxpayers, or other people similarly authorize and approve
govt to mandate right to life, or war contracts, or policies that allow environmental destruction,
that's on the taxpayers for not standing united and enforcing ethical policies and standards.

It's the same problem we are having locally with teachers and police:
We can't just expect the people we hire to do all the law enforcement and take all the responsibility for teaching kids.
The people have to agree to follow the laws and enforce them, and teach consistent standards.
or that's too much work on the "hired staff" who can't effectively manage that much of the population, power and responsibility
unless there is an agreement to SHARE the responsibility and enforce the same standards so everyone is in compliance.
otherwise there is corruption and abuse by imbalance of responsibility and power concentrated in the hands of the few.

That's what's wrong with running govt that way.
You can't expect to govern all the populations and interests out of DC with just
Congress or Courts/President. That's why we have delegated powers and jurisdiction
to STATES in order to localize as much as possible.

We would have to have a smaller ratio of population to each representative in charge
if you really want to delegate responsibility. More of the management needs to be
on the local level and then we can have representative democracy, where it builds
upward like a pyramid.

The direction should be that the grassroots members form agreements and the policies
reflect that collective agreement. Then move up the scale where the SMALLEST
amount of govt is at the top where everyone AGREES.

And where we diverge with diverse beliefs and interests,
the broader base remains at the bottom where individuals and states
retain freedom and responsibility to develop their own programs -- not dictated from the top down.

The reason we have people dictating from the top down is
* the bureaucracy we have now is unmanageable and cannot be navigated
therefore the backlog and red tape prevents solutions from getting anywhere
and people resort to railroading compromised and porkbarrelled type legislation through to get anything at all through
* people are at different levels of education, independence or dependence on govt,
financial political and social development, and also have different BELIEFS about govt
so it's hard to get a consensus when interests and ideas are competing for dominance
instead of coordinating people by groups that do represent them and delegating resources
that way, where everyone can coordinate in the ways that work for them without conflict.

Not everyone is trained to even seek such coordination, consensus and inclusion
so it's no wonder we have strayed so far.

out of pure necessity, we will have no choice but to organize based on like beliefs
and coordinate resources by political affiliations and social level of development so
everyone's interests and beliefs are represented and protected equally.

The same way the 13 original colonies had to unite and still protect the sovereignty
and identity of each separate state, we need to do the same with parties;
unite while recognizing the sovereignty of each party's identity with relation to its membership
base and allow representation and investment of resources accordingly.

We can have united parties and still recognize individual management of each one unto itself,
instead of this competition for power and dominance going on.

JakeStarkey if we had States at war to force each other under the dominant policies of the other,
then all States would lose ability to represent and protect their own interests while fighting such oppression.

But today we are running a system that rewards parties for bullying by coercion and exclusion,
conspiring to censor the beliefs of the other party members by pushing the dominant belief through govt, etc.

so we all lose our equal rights to representation, democratic process, and protection of laws
by allowing these to be suppressed by other parties abusing majority rule.

Now we've had this discussion before regarding
the difference between SECULAR policies where people AGREE to whatever policy passes by process
of majority vote;
VS issues of BELIEF that even a majority rule does not authorize govt to endorse establish or impose.

And the problem we have is that
religious beliefs are not clearly and legally
defined to specify how to manage
Political Beliefs or things that people don't agree are beliefs or not
(such as right to health care or orientation/transgender identity
that aren't recognized as optional beliefs though people are arguing they are)

I'm okay if people CONSENT to compromising policies passed by majority rule or
executive order/court ruling that the people AGREE is within Constitutional process.

But what is causing the problems is coercion going on
OUTSIDE Constitutional limits
(including issues of BELIEFS, influence by media or by party
when neither of these are policed or bound by Constitutional process,
Corporate influence and resources skewing the process without Constitutional check,
etc.)

Since we don't have Constitutional laws that directly check these other
influences on our democratic/representative process,
that's why I appeal to people to enforce Constitutional standards
directly and uniformly ANYWAY.

As I cited before, the example of the difference it makes when the
community or population ALL agree to follow the laws,
instead of just expecting teachers or police to enforce or teach standards.

So it is more responsibility than just voting and expecting other people to do all this work.
Each citizen cannot be contributing to unconstitutional bureaucracy and backlog
by paying taxes into govt abuse and waste and allowing resources to go unchecked.

We have to take responsibility as taxpayers for where our money labor and support goes.
We can't expect hired help to magically represent us when there are more people
and more diverse parties than each one of them can possible manage and represent.
 
Emily, you along with Holly, you are wonderful hearted and spirited.

I have but one question for you now: how much sleep do you require in 24 hours?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Historic Speech in Gettysburg, PA

< Previous Thread

Hilary trashed New York when she was Senator, let's let her do that to the rest of the country...

Next Thread >

Similar threads

0311
Texas Prosecutor Convenes Grand Jury To Investigate Uvalde Shooting Multiple Media Report.
Replies
11
Views
201
0311
0311
citygator
Japan Embassy to the US: Important Taylor Swift release
Replies
5
Views
146
Synthaholic
Synthaholic
Pastelli
Islamist Ilhan Omar: her loyalty is to Somalia alone (forget dual loyalty canard)
2 3
Replies
41
Views
570
Rambunctious
Rambunctious
excalibur
The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History
10 11 12
Replies
239
Views
4K
John Edgar Slow Horses
John Edgar Slow Horses
Litwin
Norwegian companies ´ll sell weapons and defense equipment to Ukraine I Moscow has continued to use KGB-style ruses to conjure the illusion of success
Replies
7
Views
152
Litwin
Litwin

Latest Discussions

Litwin
  • Poll
Speaker Johnson : "I believe Xi, Vladimir putin and Iran really are an axis of evil"
Replies
9
Views
16
Litwin
Litwin
B
Justice Gorsuch Lays Waste to the Biden Administration's Argument for Jail Sentences
4 5 6
Replies
104
Views
503
Billiejeens
B
Votto
Biden claims military unable to rescue his uncle during WW2 because of cannibals in New Guinea
Replies
15
Views
38
Lisa558
L
Blaster
Trump Cheered in New York
2
Replies
21
Views
128
Blaster
Blaster
Independentthinker
Trump Has A First Amendment Right To Say The Election Was Stolen
47 48 49
Replies
972
Views
102K
billyerock123
B
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top