Hillary's Favorite Racist?

Yes...nice dodge....what percent of whites are on welfare and what percent of African Americans......that is how you measure it....

No, that's not how you measure it by the measure of Lumpy set down. Lumpy said that them coloreds vote for Obama because he's giving out the welfare...

hqdefault.jpg

Pictured: Lumpy sharing his wisdom with us.

But in fact.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsrace2012.pdf

The employment-population ratio was 53.0 percent for Blacks, 57.6 percent for individuals of Two or More Races, 59.4 percent for Whites, 59.5 percent for Hispanics, and 60.1 percent for Asians. (See tables 1, 2, 3, and 5.) Among adult men (age 20 and older), Hispanics (73.8 percent) continued to have the highest employmentpopulation ratio in 2012, followed by Asians (72.0 percent) and Whites (68.6 percent). The employment-population ratio for Black men, at 58.3 percent, was lower than the ratios for men in other major race and ethnicity groups in 2012, continuing a long-term pattern. Among adult women the employment-population ratio was 55.3 percent for Asians, 55.1 percent for Blacks, 54.9 percent for Whites, and 53.5 percent for Hispanics in 2012.

Actually the Chicago Tribune named the woman a welfare queen not Reagan, and the Willie Horton add was accurate...it was dukakis who had the policy....much like the sanctuary city status that cost that young woman her life this week.....

Yup, the old Republican tactic. Let's scare white people into voting against their own economic interests. and tell them they done need them a Gun, Cleetus.

And you stupid fucks keep falling for it. Amazing. Last five Recessions have been on Republican watches....

Minorities might end up saving you people from yourselves.
 
Let me translate that: I know he is right, since all those groups are rabidly racist in their views...but I am so committed to the democrat party I can't admit it.....

there you go......

I think you need to go down to the Hood and explain to folks about how Democrats are all racists and you Republicans have their backs.

Make sure you leave your penis compensation at home, though.


They are so fully under the influence of the democrats because of decades of lies told about the Republicans it will take a long time before they see the truth....they get indoctrinated in 12 years of democrat controlled education, plus they rely on democrat politicians for their benefits....hard to fight that....
And who convinced you that all the lies you spew are true?
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.
 
She did speak before the kkk, joe.
View attachment 43935

The Truth About Margaret Sanger
"I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan...I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses...I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak...In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered." (Margaret Sanger: An Autobiography, P.366)

The Truth About Margaret Sanger

That picture is a FAKE! Why do you keep lying?

Brane Space Recognizing Fake Photos
 
Wow, talk about trying to rewrite history.
Martin Luther King Jr. In 1966, the year Sanger died, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. said There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. . . . Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her (King, 1966). Was Sanger racially motivated? Despite the admiration that African-American heroes like DuBois, Powell, and King held for Sanger, arguments continue about whether or not her outreach to the black community was racially motivated. The patriarchal racism of the social policy of the time and the well-intentioned paternalism of philanthropists to “lift up” AfricanAmericans, may have influenced Sanger. But there is no evidence that Sanger, or the Federation, intended to coerce black women into using birth control: The fundamental belief, underscored at every meeting, mentioned in much of the behind-thescenes correspondence, and evident in all the printed material put out by the Division of Negro Service, was that uncontrolled fertility presented the greatest burden to the poor, and Southern blacks were among the poorest Americans. In fact, the Negro Project did not differ very much from the earlier birth control campaigns in the rural South … it would have been more racist, in Sanger’s mind, to ignore African Americans in the South than to fail at trying to raise the health and economic standards of their communities (“Birth Control or Race Control,” 2001)."

So, King lauded the efforts of someone who wanted to kill black children?
 
[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.


Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.



Being a good liberal, sticking up for your woman. Even if it proves you're kind support evil racist people.

If you guys can't prove Sanger was a racist without doctored pictures and misattributed quotes, you don't have much of an argument.

Now, as a historical figure, Sanger doesn't really fit well into any paradigm. For instance, she was (as I pointed out a few posts ago) anti-abortion, thinking it wouldn't be needed once birth control was perfected and widely available. This turned out to be largely wrong. there will always be women who use abortion as birth control, sadly.
So you are going around your ass to get to your elbow again? She was evil, and you're sticking up for her proves you are too.
Right. Any person working to provide women with equality; with the ability to choose for themselves whether to have children is evil. You think contraception is evil?
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
is that a cause or an effect
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
is that a cause or an effect


It is the primary cause...if you look at two parent families vs. single parent, teenage mother families and their outcomes....the destruction of the "poor" family because of well intentioned but destructive welfare policies have created the violence in these communities that we see today...then throw in the destruction of public eduation in the inner cities because of the power of democrat controlled teachers unions and their democrat politician allies.....and you have a mess.
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
And yet, more than half of those on welfare are white. Most Americans are educated by teachers who belong to unions. Clearly, there is something more to the poverty in inner cities than your asinine theories. Would not have anything to do with the institutional racism that kept blacks in such places, without the opportunity to work, without access to the same education that white kids got in the suburbs. Would not have anything to do with ignorant fucks like you who need to think that they are superior because of their race cause, by any other measure, they are inferior human beings?
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
is that a cause or an effect


It is the primary cause...if you look at two parent families vs. single parent, teenage mother families and their outcomes....the destruction of the "poor" family because of well intentioned but destructive welfare policies have created the violence in these communities that we see today...then throw in the destruction of public eduation in the inner cities because of the power of democrat controlled teachers unions and their democrat politician allies.....and you have a mess.
I agree to a point, but is it possible that the democrats in these areas are now just applying or creating various conditions to keep the minorities "in their place" in order to secure the vote?
I think if the opportunity were made available, and the welfare net was slowly removed, we would see a shift of wealth back into the inner city as those living there had hope and expectation of a better life with a little work.
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
And yet, more than half of those on welfare are white. Most Americans are educated by teachers who belong to unions. Clearly, there is something more to the poverty in inner cities than your asinine theories. Would not have anything to do with the institutional racism that kept blacks in such places, without the opportunity to work, without access to the same education that white kids got in the suburbs. Would not have anything to do with ignorant fucks like you who need to think that they are superior because of their race cause, by any other measure, they are inferior human beings?
at any given time there might be more whites on welfare but you have to look at a couple of other factors, how many of the whites are life long recipients and what percentage of each group is on welfare.
 
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
is that a cause or an effect


It is the primary cause...if you look at two parent families vs. single parent, teenage mother families and their outcomes....the destruction of the "poor" family because of well intentioned but destructive welfare policies have created the violence in these communities that we see today...then throw in the destruction of public eduation in the inner cities because of the power of democrat controlled teachers unions and their democrat politician allies.....and you have a mess.
I agree to a point, but is it possible that the democrats in these areas are now just applying or creating various conditions to keep the minorities "in their place" in order to secure the vote?
I think if the opportunity were made available, and the welfare net was slowly removed, we would see a shift of wealth back into the inner city as those living there had hope and expectation of a better life with a little work.


Without a doubt.....that is exactly what they are doing.....the last thing they want is an educated minority group who needs government, and politicians less and less......they might even vote to lower taxes........

If the cities were less violent more people would live there...but the inner city schools are terrible, because of democrats, and the violence levels are greater, due to democrat policies on welfare and law enforcement....
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
And yet, more than half of those on welfare are white. Most Americans are educated by teachers who belong to unions. Clearly, there is something more to the poverty in inner cities than your asinine theories. Would not have anything to do with the institutional racism that kept blacks in such places, without the opportunity to work, without access to the same education that white kids got in the suburbs. Would not have anything to do with ignorant fucks like you who need to think that they are superior because of their race cause, by any other measure, they are inferior human beings?


Institutional racism is a myth used to keep minorities from getting out from under democrats......and it is also a convenient excuse to keep minorities from asking...."Hey, we have been voting democrat since 1964.....and our children are dying under their rule.........what gives?" The democrats then say....ummmmmmm......errrrrrrr....."Institutional racism." And since democrats control these huge cities...who exactly is engaging in this Institutional Racism......?
 
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
is that a cause or an effect


It is the primary cause...if you look at two parent families vs. single parent, teenage mother families and their outcomes....the destruction of the "poor" family because of well intentioned but destructive welfare policies have created the violence in these communities that we see today...then throw in the destruction of public eduation in the inner cities because of the power of democrat controlled teachers unions and their democrat politician allies.....and you have a mess.
I agree to a point, but is it possible that the democrats in these areas are now just applying or creating various conditions to keep the minorities "in their place" in order to secure the vote?
I think if the opportunity were made available, and the welfare net was slowly removed, we would see a shift of wealth back into the inner city as those living there had hope and expectation of a better life with a little work.

I'm having no problem agreeing with both of you...
 
[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.


Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

None of these quotes are about sterlizing any given race. So argument fail.


We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Completely taken out of context.


But her correspondence shows this sentence advocates for black doctors and ministers to play leadership roles in the Negro Project to avoid misunderstandings. Lynchings and Jim Crow laws gave blacks good reason to be wary of attempts to limit the number of children they bore. In Harlem, she hired a black doctor and social worker to quell those fears.

The facts of the Negro Project suggest nothing more genocidal than a public health project. Black leaders DuBois and Mary McLeod Bethune, founder of the National Council of Negro Women, and the pastor of the influential black Abyssinian Baptist Church were members of its advisory council. First lady Eleanor Roosevelt was supportive.
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
And yet, more than half of those on welfare are white. Most Americans are educated by teachers who belong to unions. Clearly, there is something more to the poverty in inner cities than your asinine theories. Would not have anything to do with the institutional racism that kept blacks in such places, without the opportunity to work, without access to the same education that white kids got in the suburbs. Would not have anything to do with ignorant fucks like you who need to think that they are superior because of their race cause, by any other measure, they are inferior human beings?


What ratio of the population are whites?

Are students who graduated but remain functional illiterates truly educated?

Your race-baiting focus is very telling, but it's misguided. Any institutional racism is practiced by Progressives who have promoted an agenda of family destruction and unwed child breeding. Black Family formation was destroyed first, but poor whites are catching up with lower marriage rates and higher out-of-wedlock births. If you really want to find a root cause, it's the destruction of healthy two parent families to raise children.
 
Bull-
Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems."The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda", October 1921, page 5.The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics."The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda", October 1921, page 5.

If plants, and live stock as well, require space and air, sunlight and love, chlldren need them even more. The only real wealth of our country lies in the men and women of the next generation. A farmer would rather produce a thousand thoroughbreds than a million runts.

How are we to breed a race of human thoroughbreds unless we follow the same plan? We must make this country into a garden of children instead of a disorderly back lot overrun with human weeds.

Radio WFAB Syracuse, 1924-02-29, transcripted in "The Meaning of Radio Birth Control", April 1924, p. 111

The main objects of the Population Congress would be [...] (f) to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.
"A Plan for Peace", April 1932, pp. 107-108, summarizing an address to the New History Society, New York City, 1932-01-17




[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.


Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

None of these quotes are about sterlizing any given race. So argument fail.


We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Completely taken out of context.


But her correspondence shows this sentence advocates for black doctors and ministers to play leadership roles in the Negro Project to avoid misunderstandings. Lynchings and Jim Crow laws gave blacks good reason to be wary of attempts to limit the number of children they bore. In Harlem, she hired a black doctor and social worker to quell those fears.

The facts of the Negro Project suggest nothing more genocidal than a public health project. Black leaders DuBois and Mary McLeod Bethune, founder of the National Council of Negro Women, and the pastor of the influential black Abyssinian Baptist Church were members of its advisory council. First lady Eleanor Roosevelt was supportive.
 
Blacks kill twice as many whites every year and destroy our cities. They're a race that can't be helped...

We don't need them expanding while the intelligent races die off. That won't help anyone.
Settle down there Matthew, sure, Democrats have failed the Black race in the inner cities in jobs, education and opportunity but you can't really blame the Black race for that. You're coming off as a racist and a quite uniformed person.
This is true. It is a fact that blacks are less educated overall than the other races today, however it is still a product of segregation in the 50s and to some degree the 60s.
What it comes down to is that those blacks living in that time period were denied a proper education, which lead to lower incomes in the 60s, then you factor in the racism that kept blacks out of jobs in the 60s and you end up with a generation of blacks in the 70s that could not afford to go to college. which in turn leads to a lower college and pay rate in the 80s.
Even though it is getting better, the fact remains that the economic damage from the 50s and 60s is still being felt in the black community. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy for the inner city youth, and this perpetuates the problem. They see no honest way out so they turn to crime, selling drugs, theft etc...
Instead of giving away welfare to calm the blacks down, the democrats need to work on ways to bring education and opportunity to the black communities. Nothing can or will change until you have a generation of black youth that see opportunity in their future.
So as far as they cant be helped, that is an incorrect statement, the statement should be that they cant be helped with democratic solutions.


Actually, I don't think you are on the right track....it was the welfare programs that broke up poor families, including black families which created single, teenage mother led households. After generations of single teenagers raising children, who then raised children....and during the this time the only role models were other teenagers raised by teenagers.....a culture was created that did not understand how to get out of the poverty they were in....with less self control because it was never role modeled for them by mature, responsible adults.

Then, add to that the control of the education system by democrat unions and teachers, who are graduating as little as 50% of the students in these inner city schools and the graduates who do make it through often can't read, or do math at a high school level.....and you put the finishing touch on the futures of these poor children...and you have democrat politicians and unions standing in the school house doors keeping the students in....this time, instead of keeping them out, like last time, ensuring that they can't escape and get real educations.....

That is the problem.....
And yet, more than half of those on welfare are white. Most Americans are educated by teachers who belong to unions. Clearly, there is something more to the poverty in inner cities than your asinine theories. Would not have anything to do with the institutional racism that kept blacks in such places, without the opportunity to work, without access to the same education that white kids got in the suburbs. Would not have anything to do with ignorant fucks like you who need to think that they are superior because of their race cause, by any other measure, they are inferior human beings?
According to a liberal website put on this board by a clown faced liberal, most people want to get free stuff thus expanding the democrat party.

White, Asian, Black, Hispanic all want to be democrat living off free stuff.

True or false?

You liberals talk in circles and then it all comes back to bite you in the ass as complete nonsense.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top