Hillary: Worst Candidate, Worst Policies

The Rabbi

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2009
67,733
7,923
1,840
Nashville
There are lots of reasons to oppose Hillary. Her ethical history (or lack thereof) would have any other candidate kicked out of serious debate.
But her policy proposals also predictably suck. Here is Kudlow explaining why her idea to raise capital gains taxes to unprecedented levels is among the worst.
When cap gains taxes get cut, revenue to the federal gov't goes up. T his has been shown time and again. It also unlocks capital for new projects, which employs people. Which Democrats say they care about.
Hillary s inconceivably stupid capital-gains tax scheme Kudlow commentary
 
Hillary thinks like all liberals, that she is entitled to as much of what everyone has as she wants.

capitalism-vs-socialism.jpg
 
Hillary thinks like all liberals, that she is entitled to as much of what everyone has as she wants.

capitalism-vs-socialism.jpg
Yeah the funny thing is her proposal would bring in LESS to the Treasury, not more. Libs just dont get this fact.
 
Oh, goody, another NaziCon hate thread from racist Rabbi Nathan Bedford Forrest. What has Hillary ever been convicted of?
 
Who protects you? The government. Should anyone know handling sensitive material NOT be on a government server?

Absolutely not, and it is made very clear. How anyone can defend this is beyond logic. Her not following the rules put the whole American foreign policy at risk. It was not only her, it was every American.

If she can't follow simple rules and regulations, why would any American vote for her to be POTUS!
 
Who protects you? The government. Should anyone know handling sensitive material NOT be on a government server?

Absolutely not, and it is made very clear. How anyone can defend this is beyond logic. Her not following the rules put the whole American foreign policy at risk. It was not only her, it was every American.

If she can't follow simple rules and regulations, why would any American vote for her to be POTUS!

What "rules" were in place at the time that she violated? Please be specific - with "credible" proof. Previous Secretaries of State did the same thing.
 
Who protects you? The government. Should anyone know handling sensitive material NOT be on a government server?

Absolutely not, and it is made very clear. How anyone can defend this is beyond logic. Her not following the rules put the whole American foreign policy at risk. It was not only her, it was every American.

If she can't follow simple rules and regulations, why would any American vote for her to be POTUS!

What "rules" were in place at the time that she violated? Please be specific - with "credible" proof. Previous Secretaries of State did the same thing.


Before we debate that issue, show me other secretaries of state who did it, and be specific!
 
Lied under oath....
Hillary-classified-email-department-of-state-secretary-of-state-scandal-620x435.jpg


JUDGE NAP: If General Petraeus Committed a Crime, Hillary ‘Obviously’ Did Too]

Andrew Napolitano reacted to the latest developments in the Hillary Clinton email scandal, saying it’s “obvious” that Clinton violated the law in the same way as Gen. David Petraeus.

Clinton told reporters Saturday that she never sent or received classified information via private email when she served as secretary of state, and that the facts on the issue “are pretty clear.”

Clinton maintains that any classified information in her private emails was deemed classified after the fact.

The Justice Department is now looking into what information was exchanged on Clinton’s private server. The probe, which comes after a referral from the inspector general of the intelligence community, is not a criminal one and is not specifically targeting Clinton, the DOJ says.

Napolitano said he cannot say for sure which of Clinton’s emails contained classified information, but noted that some of the messages that are now public referred to the “location of jets over Libya” and “the location of Ambassador Stevens … in Libya.”

JUDGE NAP If General Petraeus Committed a Crime Hillary Obviously Did Too - Girls Just Wanna Have Guns
 
Is Kerry doing it? Did Rice do it? Who did it?

Regardless of who did or didn't, Hillary Clinton violated federal law. Official communique of the federal government must maintain custody by law. For Hillary to delete 30,000 that she illegally housed on a secret server is blatant disregard of federal law.

. “It’s the Clinton way: ‘You’ll have to spend years and millions of dollars to pry it out of our hands.’”

Hillary is a crook - and the nation knows it.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-7-27_14-7-16.png
    upload_2015-7-27_14-7-16.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 94
Is Kerry doing it? Did Rice do it? Who did it?

Regardless of who did or didn't, Hillary Clinton violated federal law. Official communique of the federal government must maintain custody by law. For Hillary to delete 30,000 that she illegally housed on a secret server is blatant disregard of federal law.

. “It’s the Clinton way: ‘You’ll have to spend years and millions of dollars to pry it out of our hands.’”

Hillary is a crook - and the nation knows it.
161199_600.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top