Hillary violates national security at last night's debate?

[Freewill]

I have never heard before the strategically very sensitive information that it took 4 minutes to launch a NUCLEAR STRIKE after the Presidential decision to "Go" is made.

Hillary casually referenced this very strategically important information at last night's debate. Did she violate national security?

Comey will just say she didn't have the intent on leaking, thus no foul. That is if they even look into the issue, which they won't.

We are a banana republic that is the one clear thing that comes out of this election.

 

[Freewill]

I love how Trump continually brings up how it is strategically inept to announce where you are going to attack,

Last night....Why do they announce they are going to attack Mosul? Why give them warning? We need to sneak attack

Mosul is a major fortified city. Does Trump think they don't know they will be attacked? Does he think an army can advance on a city and nobody would realize it?

You announce it to reduce civilian casualties. In his cartoonish version of the world, Mosul is a city that is 100% enemy. His world view is one of WWII where Germany was the enemy and the whole of Germany must be destroyed. Things have changed over the intervening 70+ years.

You mean like Hillary threatening Iran with nuclear destruction?

No this is scary stuff, which of course you will just hold your nose a little tighter.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484

 

[Freewill]

Kinda like when Biden outsted the guy with the nuclear codes? Liberals are clueless.

Why would they care with people like Comey in their pocket? They, or anyone else, can do whatever they want if there are no consequences.

 

[MisterBeale]

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon

Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.

So you never read the Wikileaks on how ISIS was created huh?

Typical.

RussiaLeaks/WikiLies is hardly a reliable source for anything. ISIS started under Bush, and no amount of Trump trumpery can change that fact.

It's more reliable the CFR propaganda. Nothing in it has ever been proven false.

BULLSHIT!
And nothing from RussiaLeaks/WikiLies has been proven true.

Robby Mook, John Podesta, and Hillary Clinton all admit that the information is genuine, though they refuse to release the original source material (paid speeches), so why don't you just wake up and admit to yourself that the emails are genuine?

Even a highly partisan and liberal source like Politifact operates with the position that Wikileaks is a legitimate source of information, mostly because the Clinton campaign admits as much. Why would the establishment wish them silenced and criticize the clandestine efforts of Russia if what they were releasing was bogus? They would just ignore it like that Sorcha Faal crap. But they can't, everyone knows it is genuine.

Use your head man.

Trump: 'I’ve been proven right' on Clinton and open borders

 

[anniemahaley]

Her remark was to impress......nothing more, IMO. Like.....did you know that Donald?