Hillary - One of the Most Honest Politictians in Washington Today

[P@triot]

I've said for decades that she is a sociopath (doesn't take a world-renowned psychologist to recognize what the pathological lying mixed with the inability to connect with people on a genuine level equals)...

 

[P@triot]

This is how evil liberalism is...throwing away all of their integrity and surrendering their professional responsibilities in favor of pushing propaganda...

To fight Trump, journalists have dispensed with objectivity

LA Times Admits: Media Ditching Objectivity to Attack Trump

 

[Flopper]

Unlike the current Republican nominee, Obama certain brought to the office applicable qualifications, a graduate of the Harvard Law School and President of the Harvard Law Review, a teacher of constitutional law, work as a civil rights attorney, 7 years in the Illinois Senate, and 3 years as a US Senator.

I would love to agree with you, however, since Barry sealed all of his academic records and refused to release the papers he wrote - as he promised Hillary he would do in 2008, we are only left with his actual actions upon which to base his academic prowess.

Since he has continuously refused to enforce the Rule of Law, has protected those who have broken the law, has broken the law, has refused to obey court orders, and has been found in Contempt of Court as President we can only assume that there is a community college somewhere in Chicago that also bears the name 'Harvard law School' from where he got his diploma.

That's nonsense. Obama’s college records are not “sealed” by a court order. Obama hasn’t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates. Hillary certainly hasn't and neither has Trump. There is no reason why a candidate should willing release such information because the opposition will create issues concerning teachers, other students, and course content to draw the candidate off message.

Harvard like other colleges will not release information about students without their consent but they will certainly certify graduation so there is no doubt that Obama graduated from the Harvard School of Law and it also a verifiable fact that he was admitted the Illinois Bar in 1991. It is also a verifiable fact that Obama was President of Harvard Law Review and that he was employed as a teacher of Constitutional Law at University of Chicago.

In regard to Obama's academic achievements, you do not get admitted to the Harvard School of Law without a high GPA and LSAT score regardless of the color of your skin. To become President of the Harvard Law Review you first must be selected as an editor which is based on high grades and a writing completion. To become President of Law Review you must first be an editor and you must be elected by the other editors.

There is just no way you can achieve what Obama achieved without a strong academic background.

 

[easyt65]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

 

[Flopper]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Obama's knowledge of the constitution has nothing to do with this problem.

First off, FOIA don't go to the president they go directly to various agencies. The fact that agencies now accept electronic submissions of requested have created a mountain of requests. Obama acknowledged that while battles continue over what should and shouldn't be released, federal agencies are struggling to keep up with the requests that are streaming in.

In June Obama signed a new law to improve the sluggest response of the goverment to requests.
Obama signs FOIA reform bill

 

[Dr Grump]

[

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Clinton Says Chinese Money Did Not Influence U.S. Policy

Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998

Clinton Approves Technology Transfer to China

Notice anything about the articles? They are all from hard core left-wing sites. Good luck trying to attack the messenger. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. I've given you everything you need. Do your own research if you really care. Or continue to blindly worship Hitlery. Makes no difference to me.

So I've read the first two. All I have to say is, So fucking what?

 

[Meathead]

So I've read the first two. All I have to say is, So fucking what?

In the words of the |Beast itself, What difference does it make?

 

[Dr Grump]

So I've read the first two. All I have to say is, So fucking what?

In the words of the |Beast itself, What difference does it make?

More like, there's nothing there.

 

[hadit]

"I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material"

After that was proven false,

"I can only repeat what happens to be the case-- that I did not send nor receive information that was marked classified at the time that it was sent or received".

This is a perfect illustration of the Clinton SOP. Note the change between the two statements. The first statement is a lie that was quickly proven to be so. Instead of admitting that it is a lie, we get the second, and as we are finding out, it is not so truthful either. In addition, whether the information was marked classified is irrelevant, because Hillary was trained and responsible to mark information classified and handle it properly. She did not do so.

A lie is not saying something that later proves to be false. What makes it a lie is the deliberate intent to deceive. If Clinton did not believe the email was marked classified, what she said was not a lie. So it is your opinion she lied certainly not a fact.

Incorrect. The fact that she changed her story means she knows the first iteration is provably false. Plus, it is irrelevant because as Sec State, she was TRAINED and RESPONSIBLE to mark information classified if she saw it and handled it. That she did not do. By trying to give her this excuse, you are essentially admitting she was incompetent.

Changing your statement can always be because you discovered what you said was incorrect and want to correct it.

If you had paid a little attention, you would know that she has already admitted that she was mistaken. She's apologized and has taken full responsibly. Hillary knows that if you make a mistake, you can admit it and voters are likely to accept it knowing that everyone makes mistakes, except of course Donald Trump.

She admitted she was incompetent? Where did she do that?

If she admitted she made mistakes, why are her defenders still using the "it wasn't marked classified" excuse? If she admitted it was wrong to not mark the information classified, why are people still trying to claim she did nothing wrong? In all seriousness, there was some really highly classified stuff on her server, enough that claiming she didn't know it was supposed to be classified is really damning.

 

[charwin95]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

 

[easyt65]

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

OBEYING THE LAW....how about Obama release all those Fast-And-Furious documents the court ordered him to 7 YEARS AGO yet he still refuses to do so?!

Americans aren't entitled to Trump's tax returns, but America is entitled to those documents, and Obama is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to turn them over.

Your priorities and concern for the law is UNDER-whelming....

 

[Wyatt earp]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron.

God why are liberals so retarded?

 

[Oldstyle]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron.

God why are liberals so retarded?

Because they watch MSNBC?

 

[charwin95]

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

OBEYING THE LAW....how about Obama release all those Fast-And-Furious documents the court ordered him to 7 YEARS AGO yet he still refuses to do so?!

Americans aren't entitled to Trump's tax returns, but America is entitled to those documents, and Obama is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to turn them over.

Your priorities and concern for the law is UNDER-whelming....

I'm asking Trump tax returns.

 

[charwin95]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron. ?

Would you care to repeat that?

 

[Oldstyle]

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

OBEYING THE LAW....how about Obama release all those Fast-And-Furious documents the court ordered him to 7 YEARS AGO yet he still refuses to do so?!

Americans aren't entitled to Trump's tax returns, but America is entitled to those documents, and Obama is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to turn them over.

Your priorities and concern for the law is UNDER-whelming....

I'm asking Trump tax returns.

And what are you asking them, Charwin? Do they talk back to you when you ask them things?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

OBEYING THE LAW....how about Obama release all those Fast-And-Furious documents the court ordered him to 7 YEARS AGO yet he still refuses to do so?!

Americans aren't entitled to Trump's tax returns, but America is entitled to those documents, and Obama is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to turn them over.

Your priorities and concern for the law is UNDER-whelming....

I'm asking Trump tax returns.

Why would anyone in their right mind give the opposition info to attack them with?

 

[charwin95]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron.

God why are liberals so retarded?

Because they watch MSNBC?

And you watch Faux news and read tabloid magazine national enquirer.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron.

God why are liberals so retarded?

Because they watch MSNBC?

And you watch Faux news and read tabloid magazine national enquirer.

The national enquired is more accurate then MSNBC

 

[Oldstyle]

Again, you can claim whatever you want but it doesn't stack up against the facts. Mr. MOST TRANSPARENT EVER is ANYTHING BUT!

Since when does a Constitutional Scholar violate 70% of ALL FOIA requests? Maybe he was sick and out of class that day when they covered this / adherance to the law...

Transparency.......... How about Trump tax returns?

Trump is not running on transparency you moron.

God why are liberals so retarded?

Because they watch MSNBC?

And you watch Faux news and read tabloid magazine national enquirer.

Actually I seldom watch the news at all and I read 3 newspapers on a regular basis...The Wall Street Journal, USA Today & The Boston Globe. Did you want to criticize those?