Hillary Not Liberal Enough For New Democratic Party

Bush92

GHBush1992
May 23, 2014
34,808
10,703
1,400
Hillary Clinton Returns to Iowa for Senator Tom Harkin - NBC News
Meet the Press has an interesting clip on how Hillary is not liberal enough for Democratic Party. I have had several go arounds with liberals on this board about how far to the left the Democratic Party has become. Some have even tried to claim, laughably I might add, that the Democratic Party is "mainstream." :lmao:So my question is: "Has the Democratic Party gone so far left that they risk becoming an extremist fringe party?" Look at the platform of Socialist Party USA...I doubt many Democrats on this board would disagree with their core principles.
Platform - Socialist Party USA
 
Last edited:
Lol.

Nice try.

Hillary is going to announce. She is going to run. She will win the DEM nomination and she will win the 2016 GE in a landslide, coming in at around 57% of the NPV and over 400 EV.

Feel free to bookmark this posting.

:thup:
 
The Neo Democrats post Obama are not going to accept anyone to the right of an Occupy Wall Street protester. The party is extremist.
 
I think your the one that is delusional. Your party is too far left to be credible in the next several elections.
 
Lol.

Nice try.

Hillary is going to announce. She is going to run. She will win the DEM nomination and she will win the 2016 GE in a landslide, coming in at around 57% of the NPV and over 400 EV.

Feel free to bookmark this posting.

:thup:
Yay! My Team!
It's about as sophisticated an analysis as you ever come up with.

The truth is Hillary is dogged by her vote on Iraq, especially now that Obama has had to go back in and try to fix his own fuck up in leaving. She comes across as lying, deceitful and without any principles whatsoever beyond winning.
No, Dems will embrace their inner Chavez and go for Bernie or Liz. Just a toss up to see who pushes for nationalizing industry first.
 
Yes, that is why Obama won in 2008 by +7.26 and in 2012 by +3.86 and also why the Democrats netted three more seats in the Senate in 2012!!!

Bush92, you crack me up. Are you a bot??

:rofl:
Obama won by running as a mainstream moderate. He beat Hillary btw.
You cleverly leave out the historic turnover in the House in 2010 in teh wake of Democrats enacting most of their radical agenda.
 
And the DEMS turned that tide back in 2012, a point you decided not to mention.

Please, remind us again of how Hillary was beaten by Obama in the 2008 and how this of course makes her unelectable in 2016. Go right ahead, Kemosabi.
 
Yes, that is why Obama won in 2008 by +7.26 and in 2012 by +3.86 and also why the Democrats netted three more seats in the Senate in 2012!!!

Bush92, you crack me up. Are you a bot??

:rofl:
Hillary finished behind John Edwards in 2008. Third.
 
Lol.

Nice try.

Hillary is going to announce. She is going to run. She will win the DEM nomination and she will win the 2016 GE in a landslide, coming in at around 57% of the NPV and over 400 EV.

Feel free to bookmark this posting.

:thup:
Yay! My Team!
It's about as sophisticated an analysis as you ever come up with.

The truth is Hillary is dogged by her vote on Iraq, especially now that Obama has had to go back in and try to fix his own fuck up in leaving. She comes across as lying, deceitful and without any principles whatsoever beyond winning.
No, Dems will embrace their inner Chavez and go for Bernie or Liz. Just a toss up to see who pushes for nationalizing industry first.
Iraq vote and Wall Street connections will doom her.
 
And the DEMS turned that tide back in 2012, a point you decided not to mention.

Please, remind us again of how Hillary was beaten by Obama in the 2008 and how this of course makes her unelectable in 2016. Go right ahead, Kemosabi.
They did? The House is controlled by Democrats? Who knew?
 
Yes, that is why Obama won in 2008 by +7.26 and in 2012 by +3.86 and also why the Democrats netted three more seats in the Senate in 2012!!!

Bush92, you crack me up. Are you a bot??

:rofl:
Hillary finished behind John Edwards in 2008. Third.

And you are saying that this makes her unelectable in 2016?

She finished third in Iowa, Kemosabi, not nationally. In the process itself, nationally, she finished a razor-close second and actually got more popular votes than Obama.
 
Irrational Right-Wing anger is so fun to watch on a Monday morning.

Please, continue....
LEft wing jerk off fantasies are so much fun to watch. OK, not that much fun. But the level of ignorance and magical thinking is astounding. The same people believed a one term senator from Illinois with an undistinguished record would somehow make a president who could heal the planet.
 
And the DEMS turned that tide back in 2012, a point you decided not to mention.

Please, remind us again of how Hillary was beaten by Obama in the 2008 and how this of course makes her unelectable in 2016. Go right ahead, Kemosabi.
They did? The House is controlled by Democrats? Who knew?


Nope. But the DEMS increased their control of the Senate. That is called turning the tide.

Remember, 2012 was the second time in a row that the GOP fucked up so badly and fielded crazy assed tea party nutz who then lost in the GEs.

Hillaryous!!
 
Bernie Sanders is a socialist and will beat Hillary in Iowa because he is in tune with New Democratic Party. If anything he will push her so far left she would lose independents even if she gets nomination. Liz warren will get nomination if she throws her hat in the ring.
 
Lol.

Nice try.

Hillary is going to announce. She is going to run. She will win the DEM nomination and she will win the 2016 GE in a landslide, coming in at around 57% of the NPV and over 400 EV.

Feel free to bookmark this posting.

:thup:
Are you using your 110% scale? On that I give her 51%. Between blowjobs, Obama and Benghazi, she's pretty much washed up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top