Hillary glad to meet BLM in Cleveland. Refuses to meet with Cleveland Police

Yeah, that's why he didn't put her to prison...

Perhaps it's just that this man has at least some integrity remaining, and won't sit idle as the country is pillaged by criminals.

No, it shows the mistake of holding over the other party's hacks in positions of leadership.

Comey disobeyed directives from his boss and policies not to release information on ongoing investigations. In the real world, that gets you fired, usually.
 
Yeah, that's why he didn't put her to prison...

Perhaps it's just that this man has at least some integrity remaining, and won't sit idle as the country is pillaged by criminals.

No, it shows the mistake of holding over the other party's hacks in positions of leadership.

Comey disobeyed directives from his boss and policies not to release information on ongoing investigations. In the real world, that gets you fired, usually.

He said he closed an investigation, and then informed the investigation has been re-opened. I don't think you have a case... too absorbed in liberal media.
 
Yeah, that's why he didn't put her to prison...

Perhaps it's just that this man has at least some integrity remaining, and won't sit idle as the country is pillaged by criminals.

No, it shows the mistake of holding over the other party's hacks in positions of leadership.

Comey disobeyed directives from his boss and policies not to release information on ongoing investigations. In the real world, that gets you fired, usually.


There was no direct confrontation between Lynch or Yates and Comey. Instead, the disagreements were conveyed to Comey by Justice Department staff, who advised the FBI chief his letter would be against department policy to not comment on investigations close to an election, the officials said.
While there was no explicit order not to send the letter, department officials expressed concern that what Comey wanted to do was contrary to how the department does business given how close this was to the election. They added it was contrary to department policies and procedures, one law enforcement source said.


Comey notified Congress of email probe despite DOJ concerns - CNNPolitics.com
 
Yeah, that's why he didn't put her to prison...

Perhaps it's just that this man has at least some integrity remaining, and won't sit idle as the country is pillaged by criminals.

No, it shows the mistake of holding over the other party's hacks in positions of leadership.

Comey disobeyed directives from his boss and policies not to release information on ongoing investigations. In the real world, that gets you fired, usually.


There was no direct confrontation between Lynch or Yates and Comey. Instead, the disagreements were conveyed to Comey by Justice Department staff, who advised the FBI chief his letter would be against department policy to not comment on investigations close to an election, the officials said.
While there was no explicit order not to send the letter, department officials expressed concern that what Comey wanted to do was contrary to how the department does business given how close this was to the election. They added it was contrary to department policies and procedures, one law enforcement source said.


Comey notified Congress of email probe despite DOJ concerns - CNNPolitics.com

And as usual they have no concern over the "usual" CRIMINAL behavior that Hillary happily partakes in.
 
He said he closed an investigation, and then informed the investigation has been re-opened. I don't think you have a case... too absorbed in liberal media.

A case that involves a computer used by a third party where none of the emails came from her computer.

No, this was kind of a scummy, partisan operation by a Director who lost the respect of his agency.
 
So your argument is, the US is fucked, don't even try and save it? Right, got it.

What did they do with Trump and Romney? I'm sorry, if you don't win, then you go off on boohoo politics. Give me a break.

The media is the power, Trump has HARNESSED the media. He'd never have got anywhere near the presidency without the media, and he's moaning they're against him. Fuck that, they've given him everything he has in this election.

He stood up and demanded to be the clown, then they call him a clown and he throws balloons at them.

First you say that my argument is the US is Fd, so don't even try to save it, but then say the MSM is the power? Well where do you think the media derives that power from?

What did they do with Trump and Romney? Haven't you been paying attention? They attacked both men on a personal basis. They've attacked their businesses repeatedly. They brought up stories about how Romney tied his dog carrier to the top of his car when he and his family went on vacation. They dug up some story about when he was in high school back in the 60's and played a prank on a classmate by giving him a haircut. They reported that he had a car lift in his garage and bashed him for that.

During the primaries, Cruz went after Trump's wife. The MSM tried to find women he dated many years ago to claim Trump was rude and disrespectful, and then it turned out they felt the exact opposite about Trump. And of course we had this Trump on the bus thing. All kinds of women came out of the woodwork to make false claims against Trump and the MSM reported on every one of them without doing any research into their claims.

Yes the media paid a lot of attention to Trump for two reasons: Ratings and to help ensure he got the nomination. They believed that Trump was the only person Hil-Liar had a chance to beat. But trust me, they didn't give him all that air time because they liked him so much.

The media has a lot of power, if they have a lot of readership. However "the media" as a single unit doesn't exist. You have lots of different companies and anyone can start up their own part of the media and report on things and do it in their own way.

They attack Trump for obvious reasons. He's attacked EVERYONE too, then complains that other people attack him. Most people who work in the media are intelligent. Intelligent people have turned away from Trump, people who see his flip flopping on a constant basis, his attacks, his lack of policies, how can they NOT attack him. Trump is actually leading them to attack him, it's his tactics, so he can then complain about it.

Romney, no doubt got attacked, but by the whole media? Doubtful, did Fox attack him as much as others? Probably no, no doubt they attacked Obama. Attacking candidates is what the media is there for. They bring up stories about everyone. Just that some people have more stories to be attacked for. Don't you think people who do bad things should be attacked the same as those who don't?

Women are coming out with stories, are you saying these didn't happen and they just made it all up? I mean, the nonsense Trump has said in his life, like he'd be dating a 10 year old in 10 years time, sex in relation to his daughter. They're not making it up, they're showing his CHARACTER. Don't people have the right to know his character?

You act like the media should not report things that happened in order to be "fair" somehow. Trump has brought EVERYTHING on himself. And then complains.

Yes, they love Trump because of the ratings, and because he's a bad boy. If they made nice stories about Trump, he'd probably get LESS votes. It's ridiculous, then people believe his boohooing.
Media is to report news. Not comment. Let's just be clear. And majority are not reporting news and that same majority keeps commenting and I merely say, fk them!

Why? They're private companies. It's like saying that a chocolate maker should not be making other kinds of sweets, or a pen maker should not be making paper. Why not? They can produce whatever they like. If you want a news station that just reports the news and doesn't comment, then MAKE YOUR OWN MEDIA STATION and see how many people sign up.
 
But does that stop the act from happening? Does it stop society from being angry?

Nothing can stop the act from happening. But the truth of the matter is that across the nation, only 1% of police are bad cops. Think of that! Wall Street wishes they only had 1% of bad players. Teachers wish they had only 1% of bad players. The Catholic church wishes they only had 1% of bad players. Just about any other organization wishes they only had 1% of bad players.

So why does it seem like much more than 1% with police officers? The answer is the media who are able to brainwash low intelligence people into hysteria.
 
Last edited:
Oh, yeah, and the Cubs are going to slaughter the Indians...


butt-kicking-678x225.jpg
 
But does that stop the act from happening? Does it stop society from being angry?

Nothing can stop the act from happening. But the truth of the matter is that across the nation, only 1% of police are bad cops. Think of that! Wall Street wishes they only had 1% of bad players. Teachers wish they had only 1% of bad players. The Catholic church wishes they only had 1% of bad players. Just about any other organization wishes they only had 1% of bad players.

So why does it seem like much more than 1% with police officers? The answer is the media who are able to brainwash low intelligence people into hysteria.

Sure, most cops aren't bad. However 1% turns into a lot of cops and a lot of bad acts.

the answer to your question is, if you have a bad teacher, what are the consequences? Not as bad as bad cops. That can often lead to killings.
 
Sure, most cops aren't bad. However 1% turns into a lot of cops and a lot of bad acts.

the answer to your question is, if you have a bad teacher, what are the consequences? Not as bad as bad cops. That can often lead to killings.

So how do you stop that? These people go into that line of work with a squeaky clean record. They are checked up and down by every government agency. Most departments only pick the best and the brightest. We have departments over here that won't even talk to you unless you have a four year college degree.

A close friend of mine has a son that became a cop. What hell he went through to get a job. Of course you have to take a written test, a physical test, a mental evaluation. Then they send out people to interview your family and neighbors. And even if you pass all that, you still probably won't get the job.

He had a college degree in law enforcement. He even went to the police academy himself and paid for it with his own money. He finally got a job across state with the Sheriffs department. Much of it was volunteer work where he didn't even get paid, but he got the experience.

After all that, he finally got a full time job with a police department about 50 miles from where he and his family lived. He's been with that police force for about three years, and during that time, he had to continue his education in law enforcement.

There is nothing more anybody can do to insure they get good people for those jobs. Bad cops are about 1% of the police forces across the country. Is there any other huge group of people that have 0% of bad apples?
 
Sure, most cops aren't bad. However 1% turns into a lot of cops and a lot of bad acts.

the answer to your question is, if you have a bad teacher, what are the consequences? Not as bad as bad cops. That can often lead to killings.

So how do you stop that? These people go into that line of work with a squeaky clean record. They are checked up and down by every government agency. Most departments only pick the best and the brightest. We have departments over here that won't even talk to you unless you have a four year college degree.

A close friend of mine has a son that became a cop. What hell he went through to get a job. Of course you have to take a written test, a physical test, a mental evaluation. Then they send out people to interview your family and neighbors. And even if you pass all that, you still probably won't get the job.

He had a college degree in law enforcement. He even went to the police academy himself and paid for it with his own money. He finally got a job across state with the Sheriffs department. Much of it was volunteer work where he didn't even get paid, but he got the experience.

After all that, he finally got a full time job with a police department about 50 miles from where he and his family lived. He's been with that police force for about three years, and during that time, he had to continue his education in law enforcement.

There is nothing more anybody can do to insure they get good people for those jobs. Bad cops are about 1% of the police forces across the country. Is there any other huge group of people that have 0% of bad apples?

How do you stop it? You don't.

The only way to stop it is to make the streets safer for cops, make cops less paranoid about being out there among an armed populace which is willing to use its guns to a certain extent. Guns are a major problem in the US.

Bad cops in the UK aren't going to fire guns. It's that simple. The number of shootings by the police in a year is like 3 or something. That's over the whole country.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top