Hillary Clinton’s Interpretation Of Espionage

Discussion in 'Immigration/Illegal Immigration' started by Flanders, Oct 20, 2016.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    I could have posted this thread in the Politics forum, the Environment forum, or the Law and Justice System forum. I chose Immigration/Illegal Immigration because Hillary Clinton tied open-borders to environmental crapola and espionage.

    Go to the brief video excerpt from the debate and you will hear Wallace ask Clinton about this:

    "My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere."​


    NOTE: Hillary lied about Ronald Reagan’s position. Remember that Ronald Reagan went along with the first amnesty in 1986 based on Democrat promises of border security. Naturally, Democrats did not keep their word. Instead, 3 million illegals got amnesty, Democrats got 3 million legal voters, and Americans lost control of their borders. Instead of border security Democrats went back on their their word to RR by opening the borders even wider so millions more illegal aliens demanding amnesty can come through and head straight for the public trough. In fact, Hillary & Company erased borders entirely in order to accommodate United Nations refugees.

    The espionage connection

    Go back to the beginning of Clinton’s pivot in the video, move the cursor to 55, and you will hear her doublespeak an accusation of espionage against Donald Trump. Hillary was never the brightest bulb on the tree, but I thought that she was exceptionally stupid to mention espionage since she was the only one in the building last night who is in danger of being convicted of espionage.


    Not only did Ms. Clinton deliberately demonstrate disdain for the Federal Records Act and nullify the protections of the Freedom of Information Act, she violated the Espionage Act by having information relating to the national defense on her server at all. And her deliberate disregard for national security made the job of all hackers that much easier. As Andy McCarthy explained it in the National Review: In fact, the espionage act—which regulates the handling of intelligence by government officials — does not refer to classified information; it refers to information relating to the national defense.

    XXXXX

    Ms. Clinton, however, established her entire system to avoid the law and in violation of the Espionage Act—as she and her co-conspirators removed all records from the State Department from its inception.​

    The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean
    By Sidney Powell | 08/13/15 4:17pm

    The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now


    As soon as Wallace finished asking Clinton about open-borders, she laid down a neat piece of double-talk before she pivoted to triple-talk about Putin:

    "I was talking about energy. You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined," she said. "And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that will be great benefit to us."​

    The exchange shows that Donald Trump followed Clinton’s pivot by destroying her weird defense of open-borders FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS. Followup question that should have been asked: Does your electric grid include handing control of the Internet to the United Nations?

    Trump boxing Hillary’s ears with open-borders was necessary, but he should have also nailed her to the wall with the billions of tax dollars paid out to alternative energy scams. No matter. The Donald did good.

    NOTE: It is important to point out that Trump knows how to negotiate in the private sector, but he was as green as grass when he began debating professional politicians in the debates for the nomination. Since then, he came a long way debating politics against professional liars like Hillary Clinton.

    As to Putin’s choice:


    You do not have to be a foreign policy expert to understand why Russia has been doing its bit to help Hillary Clinton win the election. If Putin’s Master Plan is only half-right Hillary Clinton has to point to Trump when Putin clearly prefers her as the next president. Putin’s master plan to date would not have been possible without the jumpstart Obama-Clinton-Kerry gave him:

    XXXXX

    I do not agree with all of the interpretations and solutions Miller’s article puts forth, but I do agree that the next American president is key to Putin’s continued success. To me, there is not a doubt that Hillary Clinton is his choice. The proof is seen in Clinton’s first loyalty to the United Nations where Russia has some control over the US with its Security Council veto.

    NOTE: China also prefers Hillary Clinton for the same reasons.

    XXXXX

    There is where the rubber hits the road. Anything that strengthens the UN’s grip on America also strengthens Russia’ grip. So it is insane to say that Russia is working to elect Donald Trump:

    XXXXX

    Donald Trump’s immigration policies clearly defend America’s sovereignty against the United Nations, Russia, China and Muslim combatants. Trump’s stated immigration policy is the exact opposite of what Putin wants to see in an American president.

    Incidentally, neither Russia nor China will give up one iota of their sovereignty.

    My point: Hillary implied Trump’s disloyalty to the US in order to disguise her own loyalty to the United Nations. Trump is well within the bounds in the final debate if he takes full advantage of Hillary’s espionage/treason against this country through her e-mail server. Tying Hillary to Russia through the United Nations along the lines I suggest should be a walk in the park.

    NOTE: Regardless of how Trump handles Clinton’s Russia card the media will spin it in her favor. Except for media influencing voters who will not vote for Trump anyway —— who gives a rat’s ass about what the media says? Both camps are set in their ways. The important factor for Trump is to cut through Hillary’s smoke and mirrors and lay out a clear choice for undecided voters. Vote for sovereignty, or vote for Putin’s master plan.

    Happily, Donald Trump will not lose one vote by defending America’s sovereignty, while Hillary Clinton will lose a great number of Democrats once they understand where she wants to take the country.

    Finally, every Republican running for Congress is holding a winning hand, but only if they know how to use it against Democrat opponents who are all Hillary clones in foreign policy.​

    Putin The Kingmaker!

    Finally, I did not watch the debate. I never do. I did read a few comments on the Internet and watched two brief video ecerpts. They told me everything I need to know. Hillary Clinton dared not defend the United Nations which is where everything she advocates originates.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Stratford57
    Offline

    Stratford57 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    3,436
    Thanks Received:
    1,456
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Kievan Rus'
    Ratings:
    +7,525
    Actually, if you can remember all her answers, there was only "We need.." and "I will..", but never "How" and "Why". On the contrary, if Trumps says something, he very well explains how and why.

    Basically, all her answers to all the questions were "Trump is so bad".

    If she's elected, she'll just follow the orders of Wall Street/Establishment, which she actually is a part of.
     
  3. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    To Stratford57: Exactly so. Clinton ATTACKS & DEFENDS WORDS. In short: There is one immutable rule for analyzing Hillary Clinton. Never, never, never believe anything she says —— look at what she does.

    Charles Krauthammer once said: Do not listen to what Obama says but look at what he does.?

    Charles Krauthammer once said: Do not listen to what Obama says but look at what he does.?

    Krauthammer’s rule for Obama has been true of every elected Democrat since LBJ. Examples:

    1. Look at what they said about the War on Poverty and look at what they did.

    2. Listen to what they said, and still say, about healthcare and look at what they did.

    3. Look at what they said about defending this country and look at what they did for America’s sworn enemies.

    4. Look at what they said about reducing nuclear arsenals with New START and look at what they did for Russia and Iran.

    5. Look at they said about defending our borders and look at what they did.

    Finally, John C. Wohlstetter said this about Putin’s preference:


    It would appear Vlad has Hillary right where he wants her.

    Much has been made of Russian hacks into political party databases and their presumed indication that the Kremlin would prefer to deal with President Trump than with President Hillary. This is quite counter-intuitive, which makes all the more puzzling the near universal belief inside the Beltway that this is so.

    There are strong reasons to conclude otherwise, summed up simply in all of seven words: Hillary’s actions speak louder than Trump’s words. Thus the Russians very likely fear Trump more than Hillary.​

    Hillary or Donald: Whom Would Putin Prefer?
    John C. Wohlstetter
    October 5, 2016, 12:15 am

    Hillary or Donald: Whom Would Putin Prefer? | The American Spectator
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Stratford57
    Offline

    Stratford57 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    3,436
    Thanks Received:
    1,456
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Kievan Rus'
    Ratings:
    +7,525
    Putin: we do not know what will happen after the US President is elected. Ms Clinton chose her aggressive rhetoric and aggressive stance with regard to Russia, and Mr Trump, on the contrary, is calling for cooperation, at least against terrorism.

    We will certainly welcome anyone who wants to work with us, and no, we are not interested in quarrelling constantly with anyone, which only creates threats to oneself and the world, or at the very least makes it harder to achieve the desired results in the fight against terrorism.
    Vladimir Putin answered questions from Russian journalists

    upload_2016-10-20_13-44-42.png
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    Donald Trump still has time to tie Clinton's first loyalty to the United Nations in his proposed national security policy for dealing with ILLEGAL ALIENS & ENEMY COMBATANTS:

    Borders and border security are not popular concepts at the United Nations.

    The United Nations has cooked up a “New Urban Agenda” coming soon to a city near you.

    It was unveiled this week in Quito, Ecuador, at the so-called Habitat III conference.

    And part of the plan, enthusiastically embraced by Hillary Clinton, calls for unlimited migration across open borders. Migrants displaced by war, failing economies or other hardships will be seen as having “rights” in nations other than their own. Cities are seen as the key battlegrounds and the U.N. conference in Quito had a lot to say about how your city will be expected to embrace migrants of all types, from all regions of the world.​

    U.N. goes all-in for unlimited migration
    Posted By Leo Hohmann On 10/21/2016 @ 8:59 pm

    U.N. goes all-in for unlimited migration

     
  6. badger2
    Offline

    badger2 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Messages:
    800
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +62
    So problematic. On the day that Brittanee Drexel disappeared, the Chappaqua Blue Racer was airborne to Lebanon. That is both a Turkish and Lebanese connection, the latter being Meera Adya, Syracuse, N.Y. for the speech at Orlando "56 Million 'Invisible' Voters. Drexel is the Turkish link to its migration history in the U.S.

    Three days before that, UK's Manchester Constable released 11 Pakistanis, yet we don't think they were vetted thoroughly enough due to the implications of understanding Pashto, Dari and especially Urdu languages. The old man without the computer was fronting with Pashto, though Alex Jones documents the Urdu link, which no one understands.

    A few days prior to that, Obama releases Bush's torture memos (Drudge, etc.). Thus, the FBI stating that there may be a link between Brittanee Drexel and Shannon McConaughey indeed points to it for the Iranian connection during the year the Shah was airborne looking for a home: Ada, Michigan and the covered bridge arson we define as the Iranian link. Otherwise, following the watercourse from Ada, the Amway link to McConaughey, one arrives at Sleepy Hollow State Park.

    An interesting Sleepy Hollow link for Halloween 2016 is Anna Cuyler Rector Furman, Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, Tarrytown, New York. The Washington Irving School links Brittanee Drexel in Rochester, New York, and John Jacob Astor will link the story of Esther Elizabeth Reed to Michigan, by default, to Ada.
    Anna Furman's husband played organ for Kohn D. Rockefeller on his birthdays, though the Rector link to the Clinton mafia and British MI6 is both at Oliver Springs, Tennessee and Temperance, Michigan. It is the Boteler-Rector-Amery line. Thus, Trump's supporting generals already kno0w the George Washington link: Jane Gustin DNA links Sir William de Wesyngton. Renee Jane Gustin, Gard-Rector Cemetery, Clark County, Ohio, whose second guardian was William Pence.

    Trump's supporting generals also know that Hillary Clinton is militarism, not military.
     
  7. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    Forget Hillary’s first loyalty. Tie her to the tax increase her stated amnesty for illegals guaranties:

    The long-term costs to taxpayers of immigrants and their descendants are detailed in a new report from the National Academy of Sciences.

    The findings in the report indicate that if amnesty for illegal immigrants were enacted, the government would have to raise taxes immediately by $1.29 trillion and put that sum into a high-yield bank account to cover future fiscal losses generated by the amnesty recipients and their children.

    To cover the future cost, each U.S. household currently paying federal income tax would have to pay, on average, an immediate lump sum of over $15,000.

    The National Academy of Sciences report, “The Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration,” provides fiscal balance projections for immigrants and their descendants over 75 years.

    Amnesty Would Cost Taxpayers Trillions, National Academy of Sciences Report Indicates
    Robert Rector
    November 04, 2016

    Amnesty Would Cost Taxpayers Trillions, Report Indicates
     
  8. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    Big Nutso’s daughter is a chip off the old blockhead:

    “We now know that the Russian Government actively worked to elect Donald Trump. The Electoral College is our defense against this attack on our sovereignty,” Hamilton Electors said in an online post. “The Electoral College must be our defense against Russia.”​

    Pelosi’s daughter leads effort to block Trump through Electoral College
    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Monday, December 12, 2016

    Nancy Pelosi’s daughter leads electors demanding intel briefing on Russia’s ties to Donald Trump

    John C. Wohlstetter’s article published before the election demolished the Putin Loves Trump fairy tale. Alas, none of it matters to silly children living in an old lady’s shoe:

    [​IMG]
    http://www.comicbookreligion.com/img/o/l/Old_Woman_Who_Lived_in_a_Shoe.jpg

    Every one of them dreams about moving into a bigger house with the old lady come next January.
     
  9. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,982
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,769
    Big Nutso is spiraling downward into the dark world of dangerous insanity from which no traveler returns.


    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) told MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell on Tuesday that the U.S. intelligence community never thought that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, a false claim contradicted by the intelligence community’s joint assessment from 2002.

    Pelosi was responding to President-elect Donald Trump, who has criticized the intelligence community for its mistaken assessment that Iraq had an active WMD program. The 2003 invasion of Iraq was partly based on that belief.​

    Talk about resurrecting a dead issue to give Sister Hillary a boost! Accusing Trump of an illicit love affair with Putin failed to revive Hillary Clinton’s presidential expectations; nor did the recount fiasco; so Nutso Nancy is tying Trump to the WMD flap 13 or so years ago. Never mind that then-Senator Clinton voted for the invasion of Iraq:

    Pelosi blamed the “Bush-Cheney administration” for spreading the claim that Iraq had WMDs with “no intelligence to support that claim.”

    “It was a massive misrepresentation to the American people. But there’s nothing in the intelligence to support the threat that Bush-Cheney was presenting,” Pelosi claimed.

    Experts quickly pointed out that Pelosi’s claim was false.

    The intelligence community stated its belief that Iraq had WMDs in a 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) titled “Iraq’s Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Such estimates are “the [intelligence community’s] most authoritative written judgments on national security issues,” written in consultation with all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, according to the Harvard Belfer Center.​

    Pelosi Falsely Claims U.S. Intelligence Never Thought Iraq Had WMDs
    BY: Chandler Gill
    December 13, 2016 2:03 pm

    Pelosi Falsely Claims U.S. Intelligence Never Thought Iraq Had WMDs
     
  10. badger2
    Offline

    badger2 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Messages:
    800
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +62
    No, you have to snap out of it bigtime. HC spoke at Brooklyn, Wisconsin, which is the connection to Soviet radio espionage for Mildred Fish-Harnack, the only American female Hitler ever signed a death warrant for. She spoke at the Methodist mafia building, which is the same protection racket offering virtual mosques in cyberspace. You next go the Mt. Juliet, Tennessee for the latest in immigration, the town wants to be a model. The town's problem is that it links to saltpeter mining, which links to male hysteria via Charcot's Saltpetriere. When you grasp that link, you'll know why Mt. Juliet was chosen for the propaganda: strange male phenomenon in chimpanzees, where the female entering the troop's territory will be killed outright. Deterritorialized immigrants are the flip-side of the phenomenon. We know the Clinton mafia has employee family members who have transmitted ham radio across the Bering Straits from Alaska. Did these go to Russians or Chinese?
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

clinton foundation

,

hillary clinton violated espionage act