Hillary Clinton..."The People's Champion"!

If those conservative groups didn't qualify for an exemption then the IRS should have denied their applications. They didn't do that though...did they Joey? No, what Lois Lerner and her merry band did was suspend those conservative groups in a kind of "red tape limbo"...not approving them but not denying them either...stringing them along for months and sometimes years. At the same time they approved liberal groups for their exemptions. That's why Lois Lerner took the 5th! She knows damn well that what she did was wrong. She knows damn well that she violated IRS regulations and Federal law when she released confidential tax payer information to other branches of the government and to political opponents of conservatives.

No, she took the fifth because only an idiot would testify in front of Congress when they are looking for a scalp.

Point was, it was entirely within her discretion on who to scrutinize. If she wanted to use a Ouija board to decide who to scrutinize, that was her perogative.

She decided that Tea Party was good indication of fraud. Which it was. Shit, even the GOP is trying to shove the Tea Party into the attic like a crazy uncle.

Let me get this straight...you actually think that Lois Lerner was just doing her job when she targeted conservative groups and didn't target liberal groups? Name me one Tea Party group that has EVER had charges of fraud brought against it by the IRS! Just one, Joey!

The reason that Lerner took the 5th was that she knew she'd done wrong. She knew that she'd unfairly targeted conservative groups. She knew that she'd illegally released confidential tax payer information. She also knew that she had coordinated what she was doing with people in the Justice Department and in the Obama White House. That's why Lois Lerner took the 5th!
 
I'm curious, Joey...is it only the Koch brothers money that is "dark" or does George Soros's money qualify for that designation as well?

I'm for getting all money out of politics.

You didn't answer my question, Joey. Is the money coming from unions "dark" or is it only Tea Party groups that you think should be prevented from having their viewpoint heard?
 
Why do I think it's a "good thing" for our politicians to support the American casino industry over on-line gaming groups that were all based overseas to avoid American taxes and regulations? Gee, because doing so protects American jobs? Duh?

You wingnuts don't give a fuck about "American" jobs. Not with all the Free Trade treaties you've signed.

Stop being a tool or RIch People, Dog-Style. They'll fuck you over for lunch money. Trust me, been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

Now I'm for the government fucking the rich at every oppurtunity.

Stop blaming the rich for you getting canned from your job, Joey! I'm sorry but Sheldon Adelson wasn't behind that. You asked me a question and I answered it. Then you accused me of not caring about American jobs when it was you that ignored the fact that on line gambling based in other countries to avoid US taxes and regulations does cost US casino workers jobs. So who REALLY cares about American jobs...you who couldn't even grasp that they were being lost because of on-line gambling...or me who did? Duh?
 
Joey doesn't want to take all the money out of politics...he wants to take all of the conservative money out of politics. He won't admit that he's fine with George Soros's funding MoveOn.Org. and the Unions pouring millions into the campaigns of politicians who then turn around and vote them better benefits. He also won't admit that he's fine with Lois Lerner targeting conservative groups. Joey is the classic "the end justifies the means" liberal.
 
Let me get this straight...you actually think that Lois Lerner was just doing her job when she targeted conservative groups and didn't target liberal groups? Name me one Tea Party group that has EVER had charges of fraud brought against it by the IRS! Just one, Joey!

Yes, I think she was doing her job. Yes, I think when you apply for a social welfare exemption to hide your donors for political purposes, you are committing fraud.

You didn't answer my question, Joey. Is the money coming from unions "dark" or is it only Tea Party groups that you think should be prevented from having their viewpoint heard?

Are you some kind of fucking retard? Unions are covered under their OWN section of the tax code and have to specifically tell their members how much is being taken out of their dues to do politics. I mean, I have to conclude that you are some kind of retard if you don't know the difference between the tax exemptions you are talking about.

Stop blaming the rich for you getting canned from your job, Joey! I'm sorry but Sheldon Adelson wasn't behind that. You asked me a question and I answered it. Then you accused me of not caring about American jobs when it was you that ignored the fact that on line gambling based in other countries to avoid US taxes and regulations does cost US casino workers jobs. So who REALLY cares about American jobs...you who couldn't even grasp that they were being lost because of on-line gambling...or me who did? Duh?

Oh, guy, the rich were totally behind it. And much like Sheldon, they don't give a fuck about people like you. Fact is, Sheldon is buying policy that benefits SHELDON, not America. oh, yeah, and he won't support Jeb because Jeb doesnt' share his slavish devotion to Zionism.

Joey doesn't want to take all the money out of politics...he wants to take all of the conservative money out of politics. He won't admit that he's fine with George Soros's funding MoveOn.Org.

MoveOn is not a claiming a social welfare advocacy status to hide its donors, like all the Teabagging groups Lerner flagged.
 
Yet you can't name a single Tea Party group that Lerner ever brought charges against. Why is that Joey?
 
And why is it that you don't have a problem with public sector unions spending millions to elect politicians who then turn around and award those same unions lavish benefit packages...but you do have a problem with the Koch brothers spending their own money to support causes they believe in?
 
And why is it that you don't have a problem with public sector unions spending millions to elect politicians who then turn around and award those same unions lavish benefit packages...but you do have a problem with the Koch brothers spending their own money to support causes they believe in?

You mean I don't have a problem with working people getting benefits, but I do have a problem with two rich old billionaires getting benefits?

Again, are you some kind of fucking retard?
 
And why is it that you don't have a problem with public sector unions spending millions to elect politicians who then turn around and award those same unions lavish benefit packages...but you do have a problem with the Koch brothers spending their own money to support causes they believe in?

You mean I don't have a problem with working people getting benefits, but I do have a problem with two rich old billionaires getting benefits?

Again, are you some kind of fucking retard?

Those sweetheart deals that those politicians elected by public sector union money gave to those unions have buried us in unsustainable debt, Joey...but you're too stupid to realize that...aren't you? Even an uber-liberal like FDR understood the danger of public sector unions which is why he opposed them...but you're fine with it? But "I'm" the retard? Too funny...
 
Those sweetheart deals that those politicians elected by public sector union money gave to those unions have buried us in unsustainable debt, Joey...but you're too stupid to realize that...aren't you? Even an uber-liberal like FDR understood the danger of public sector unions which is why he opposed them...but you're fine with it? But "I'm" the retard? Too funny...

Guy, the Union folks are making a fair wage. Used to be we all made fair wages until the rich assholes that your tongue is permanently attached to decided that they were paying working folks too much and the bought trade deals and right to work and at-will employment laws.

The Unions guys just kept what everyone else should have.

But you are too stupid to realize that gutting the middle class so a few rich jerks could have Dressage Horses and Mansions was a terrible idea.
 
Last edited:
Those sweetheart deals that those politicians elected by public sector union money gave to those unions have buried us in unsustainable debt, Joey...but you're too stupid to realize that...aren't you? Even an uber-liberal like FDR understood the danger of public sector unions which is why he opposed them...but you're fine with it? But "I'm" the retard? Too funny...

Guy, the Union folks are making a fair wage. Used to be we all made fair wages until the rich assholes that your tongue is permanently attached to decided that they were paying working folks too much and the bought trade deals and right to work and at-will employment laws.

The Unions guys just kept what everyone else should have.

But you are too stupid to realize that gutting the middle class so a few rich jerks could have Dressage Horses and Mansions was a terrible idea.

The stupid person here is the one who buys into the nonsense that the people you liberals have decided are "rich" all live in mansions and have "Dressage Horses".

Those Public Sector Unions are killing the Private Sector Middle Class, driving up their taxes and burying them in unfunded debt. But you don't SEE that, do you Joey? You can't grasp the danger of unionized Public Sector employees as FDR did, can you?
 
the only people Hillary Clinton would champion have the surname Clinton.

And that may not include Bill
 
The stupid person here is the one who buys into the nonsense that the people you liberals have decided are "rich" all live in mansions and have "Dressage Horses".

Those Public Sector Unions are killing the Private Sector Middle Class, driving up their taxes and burying them in unfunded debt. But you don't SEE that, do you Joey? You can't grasp the danger of unionized Public Sector employees as FDR did, can you?

Oh, horseshit. NO, I don't see cops and teachers making a living wage as 'killing" the middle class.

What's killing the middle class is rich assholes using every recession as an excuse to cut working class wages and every trade deal as an excuse to send jobs overseas.

You are like someone who got his house burned down, but instead of wanting to put the Arsonist in prison, you want him to burn down your neighbor's house.
 
The stupid person here is the one who buys into the nonsense that the people you liberals have decided are "rich" all live in mansions and have "Dressage Horses".

Those Public Sector Unions are killing the Private Sector Middle Class, driving up their taxes and burying them in unfunded debt. But you don't SEE that, do you Joey? You can't grasp the danger of unionized Public Sector employees as FDR did, can you?

Oh, horseshit. NO, I don't see cops and teachers making a living wage as 'killing" the middle class.

What's killing the middle class is rich assholes using every recession as an excuse to cut working class wages and every trade deal as an excuse to send jobs overseas.

You are like someone who got his house burned down, but instead of wanting to put the Arsonist in prison, you want him to burn down your neighbor's house.

Those cops and teachers aren't making a "living wage", Joey! They used to. Sixty years ago cops and teachers made much less money but had fairly decent benefits and job security. That was the trade off that you knew you were going to make when you took those jobs. That all changed when the Public Sector unions started spending millions of dollars to elect politicians who in turn granted them more money in salaries and lavish benefits and retirement packages. That's the reason that FDR said public employees shouldn't have the right to form unions. He was intelligent enough to understand how that would work out. You on the other hand obviously AREN'T intelligent enough to figure that out! You buy into the bullshit that those government employees "deserve" salaries that are higher than what those in the Private Sector make along with great benefits and killer retirement plans even though the COST of all that has to be PAID by the Private Sector! You're too stupid to figure out that even if you taxed the wealthy at 100% it STILL wouldn't be enough to pay for what those bought and paid for politicians have obligated us for!
 
Those cops and teachers aren't making a "living wage", Joey! They used to. Sixty years ago cops and teachers made much less money but had fairly decent benefits and job security. That was the trade off that you knew you were going to make when you took those jobs. That all changed when the Public Sector unions started spending millions of dollars to elect politicians who in turn granted them more money in salaries and lavish benefits and retirement packages.

Lavish? Really?

average salary for a police officer is $52,000.

Police Patrol Officer Salary Salary.com


Average salary for a Firefighter is $43,000

Fire Fighter Salary Salary.com

Average salary for a Teacher is $53,000

Public School Teacher Salary Salary.com

These are not "Lavish' salaries. Certainly not compared to the eight figure salaries pulled in by CEO's that you are all so fine with.

You know, when you guys argue against giving working folks a living wage, you say, "Hey, go out and get an education and get a better job!"

Firefighters and Policemen and Teachers did just that, but man, it just BURNS you that they managed to organize and get better benefits, doesn't it.

Seriously, you have one serious set of fucked up values.
 
Those cops and teachers aren't making a "living wage", Joey! They used to. Sixty years ago cops and teachers made much less money but had fairly decent benefits and job security. That was the trade off that you knew you were going to make when you took those jobs. That all changed when the Public Sector unions started spending millions of dollars to elect politicians who in turn granted them more money in salaries and lavish benefits and retirement packages.

Lavish? Really?

average salary for a police officer is $52,000.

Police Patrol Officer Salary Salary.com


Average salary for a Firefighter is $43,000

Fire Fighter Salary Salary.com

Average salary for a Teacher is $53,000

Public School Teacher Salary Salary.com

These are not "Lavish' salaries. Certainly not compared to the eight figure salaries pulled in by CEO's that you are all so fine with.

You know, when you guys argue against giving working folks a living wage, you say, "Hey, go out and get an education and get a better job!"

Firefighters and Policemen and Teachers did just that, but man, it just BURNS you that they managed to organize and get better benefits, doesn't it.

Seriously, you have one serious set of fucked up values.

Dude, my grandfather was a Fire Chief, my dad was a Fire Chief, two of my brothers are Paramedics on the Fire Department. Another brother and sister are teachers. It doesn't "burn me" that they have better benefits. It does however burn me that State and Local governments are now burdened with the cost for those better benefits because we can't even come CLOSE to affording them! It burns me that the politicians that OK'd those benefits were elected with big money from those public sector unions and didn't CARE if we could afford them or not. Why should they care...it's not like the money was coming out of THEIR pockets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top