# High School Physics solve 9/11

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by creativedreams, Jan 28, 2010.

1. Offline

### creativedreamsWeaver

Joined:
Nov 15, 2009
Messages:
1,165
27
Trophy Points:
71
Ratings:
+30
High school level Physics calculations show Gravity on the World Trade Center Towers was 0.1 KiloTons of TNT-equivalent energy in "action".

The debris and dust erupted over 8.5 KiloTons of 'TNT' energy in "reaction".

FACT: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
0.1 KT ACTION does not equal 8.5 KT REACTION
http://Newton's_laws_of_motion

When the top chunk of Mt. St. Helens turned into a cloud of dust, thrown on the landscape, the TV and newspapers said the mountain expended the energy equivalent of 30,000 K Tons of TNT.

How did they know that number?
Were there conflicting opinions?
Was it a debateable issue whether it was 40,000 KT or 10,000 KT of TNT equivalent energy?

No, it was 30,000 KT, no argument, no debate....the number is not an opinion, it's a calculation of a fact.

Like an Example problem in Physics homework, multiply the massive weight of the rock times how far it flew against gravity's energy forcing it down to the ground. Weight x distance x gravity, is the energy number......the math is done......easy as pie.

The same calculation makes a fact that 8.5 KT of energy force expanded the dust cloud of pulverized concrete which came out of each Twin Tower on 9/11 and spread across Manhattan's buildings and streets an inch thick, or more.

8.5 KT of expended energy, is the number which American Corporate Media does NOT say, because it's censored, prohibited, since there's a mystery about where that energy came from. Since 0.1 KT, is all the energy that gravity had, forcing down on each building.

Gravity smacking the floors together, one-by-one flattening them like pancakes....or 110 floors pushed down into a stack on ground level, where gravity can't push any farther.

Multiply all the weight that came down the distance to the ground, and the fact is 0.1 KT of TNT equivalent energy was expended. That's all there possibly was. If a Tower weighed twice as much, there was 0.2 KT of energy in it. If it weighed twice as much being twice as tall, then 0.4 KT of energy was in it at all times.

Whether the building is on fire or not, it weighs the same and stands as tall, until gravity, not fire, starts into action.

Same as if you have a book on the table, and you push it off the edge so it drops on a weight scale. When it hits the scale, it scores the same (energy) force of gravity pushing its fall, every time, whether or not the book is on fire. Instead of a book, if you use a balloon full of water, the force measured when it falls down on the scale is the same, every time, whether the water is liquid or solid ice. And, if you know how tall the table is, and you know the weight of the book or water balloon, you can calculate the pounds of force the scale is going to show under the falling object and have that answer before you push the weight off the table.

It's not an "opinion," it's a calculation, it's a fact.

Each Twin Tower dust cloud measured 8.5 KT of (energy) force spreading out of the building. But only 0.1 KT of gravity pushed each building, straight down. This Action is NOT equal Reaction and was as if you dropped a 1 Ton book off the table and the scale measured 85 Tons hit it.

The mystery of where the extra energy force came from, measured on 9/11, is an unsolved mystery.

American Corporate News has the factual calculation of the explosive equivalent energy number, the same place they got it for Mt. St. Helens.....so what is the difference with our Media Today?

2. Offline

### FizzBANNED

Joined:
Nov 20, 2009
Messages:
4,391
345
Trophy Points:
0
Ratings:
+349

where are you getting facts like the weight of the world trade center?

3. Offline

### candycornAlis volat propriis

Joined:
Aug 25, 2009
Messages:
40,220
4,821
Trophy Points:
1,830
Ratings:
+13,504

Aren't physical objects such as clouds measured in volumetric units such as cubic meters, square footage, etc....

The OP clown is measuring or at least trying to measure clouds in force. That tells you all you need to know about the "science" and the loner who authored the OT.

4. Offline

### DiveCongone

Joined:
Aug 10, 2008
Messages:
48,025
3,384
Trophy Points:
48
Ratings:
+3,385
good question

5. Offline

### manu1959Left Coast Isolationist

Joined:
Oct 28, 2004
Messages:
13,761
1,624
Trophy Points:
48
Location:
california
Ratings:
+1,629
in addition to the weight.....there is stored energy in a building.....the enrergy uded to lift all the materials into place is stored....

6. Offline

### rightwingerAward Winning USMB Paid Messageboard PosterGold Supporting MemberSupporting Member

Joined:
Aug 4, 2009
Messages:
151,768
23,868
Trophy Points:
2,190
Ratings:
+68,522
Physics doesn't lie

How much explosive is needed to blow up the world trade centers?

7. Offline

### Mr. H.Diamond Member

Joined:
Aug 19, 2009
Messages:
44,172
9,284
Trophy Points:
2,030
Location:
A warm place with no memory.
Ratings:
+15,515
Next time use a slide rule. Worked for me in high school.

8. Offline

### SlateRockwellMember

Joined:
Jan 28, 2010
Messages:
71
6
Trophy Points:
6
Ratings:
+6
You know what really baffles me is the fact that nobody can explain why the third trade center building just fell for no reason. Lastly, nobody has recovered the black boxes from the airplanes. In the HISTORY of Black Boxes in the airplanes we have never had the problem of at least locating the site of these boxes. Let alone we went through the rubble of the 9/11 crisis with a fine tooth comb, So fine that they found bone fragments the size of finger nail clippings to identify a victim. Yet, we couldn't find these... IRONICALLY "Orange" black boxes. Things are REALLY FISHY!

P.S. This perspective was one brought to attention by the show "Conspiracy Theory hosted by Jesse Ventura". I did not come up with any of that at all. Just happen to agree with Ventura's standpoint.

9. Offline

### LA RAM FANGold Member

Joined:
Mar 1, 2008
Messages:
25,631
1,367
Trophy Points:
265
Ratings:
+5,251
the fact that there were bone fragments found on rooftops several blocks away is just one facet of the case that the disinformation agents cant get around that explosives brought the towers down since never in the history of mankind has just a mere collapse of a buiding caused that to happen.

Yeah Ventura got out of politics once he saw how corrupt things were in washington when he was governor,he wanted no part of it.When he was in the navy seals he dealt with demolitions and explosives so he is a credible source on the towers being brought down by explosives.

10. Offline

### candycornAlis volat propriis

Joined:
Aug 25, 2009
Messages:
40,220
4,821
Trophy Points:
1,830
Ratings:
+13,504
The next time a plane crashes, please stand in front of it. See if you don't go flying.

He was Governor of Minnesota. He was an embarassment to the world. Internal polling told him he would lose mightily so he quit; some hero.

When he was a wrestler he took steroids by the gross; they obviously effected his ability to reason. What is less clear is that why his taking steroids effected your ability to reason since obviously you cannot do it.

Title
Replies Views
Last Message

Replies:
1,045
Views:
9,765

Replies:
0
Views:
1

Replies:
14
Views:
59

Replies:
85
Views:
1,096

Replies:
716
Views:
9,159