sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
There was a concept being thrown around during Obamas term, mostly on the right, and it was the idea of a state constitutional convention. Which was designed to reign in the power of anything federal (say the executive branch, and a party controlled legislative branch).
Do you really want trump and a republican congress to have as much power as they do now over your life?
I'll leave it at that for now
What an awesome thread. I always love it when a person of superior intellect weighs in with a concept such as this. I mean...this outstanding person didn't vote for either Clinton nor Trump. He's clearly smarter than everyone else.
Trump and a republican congress only have as much power as we choose to give them. While we can experience some short term discomfort if members in congress don't hold up their end of the bargain, we've got a built-in remedy. There is nothing like an incompetent demagogue to liven things up for a spell.
Of course, were I a member of the military, I might be somewhat more concerned. It's clear that our PEOTUS is the type of person who has personal insecurities. He's going to make use of the might of our military at some point in an offensive manner.
Now....don't fall off of that perch of yours, oh great one. We wouldn't want you to have to make any decisions.
I have a feeling this is a sarcastic post...I honestly can't tell. I don't think of myself as intellectually superior at all, so don't put that on me in any serious or sarcastic sense. I strive for fairness, and probably fall short often, at least I make an effort to snuff it out. What I think is a fairer form of government is a central government that doesn't have as much power over our every day lives as this one has. Of which a convention of states seems like a really good idea at this time