"he's gonna take our guns!"

[IHBF]

Bahahahaha. The left used to say mocking what they saw as pseudo fear in gun lovin' 'merkins.

Well, one little event and seems a lot likelier now doesn't it?

 

[8537]

There are two major candidates for President. One has used his most recent elected position to expand and enhance gun ownership rights.

The other took steps to increase enforcement of gun laws and fawned upon the strict laws that ruled his state as a way to keep people safe.

 

[bitterlyclingin]

As heard after the November, 2008 presidential election "He was young and looked cool, so I voted for him" Ran into her again New Years Day, 2009 and the topic of conversation was how to obtain a pistol permit before Obama took the guns away.
"Good! At least next time when my husband goes away I'll have my mother, the dog, and the gun!"
They had just bought a condo and joined George Bush's "Ownership Society" Amazing the changes people undergo between when they're financially footloose and fancy free and when they gain some reponsibility. That's the reason the founders restricted the right to vote to only the property owners in the beginning. They had the most to lose therefore they should have the most to say about who did the governing and how. But over time that has been pissed away. The most copious of the pissers was a recent, now deceased US Senator, reknown for his swimming prowess and his stamina during an all night stint in a completely rented Mexican bordello who forty years ago realized that the orginal decendants of the founders were proving too rigidly self reliant, stubborn, and stiffnecked to swallow the poison the Democratic Party was then peddling. He then proposed limiting and restricting immigration from the areas of the world that previously supplied the bulk of America's immigrants and founders and instead opening up immigration to the other regions of the world from which the newly arrived immigrants would be more amenable to what the Democratic Party was trying to sell.
The proof of the Senator's acumen was the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
See Daniel Greenfields excellent essay "When Governments Elect The People"

 

[g5000]

"HE'S GONNA TAKE YUR GUNZ!!!! BUY MOAR NOW BEFORE HE DUZ!!!"

This message brought to you by the arms manufacturers and retailers of America.

 

[Mad Scientist]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

 

[Black_Label]

"HE'S GONNA TAKE YUR GUNZ!!!! BUY MOAR NOW BEFORE HE DUZ!!!"

This message brought to you by the arms manufacturers and retailers of America.

Got that right, the GOP thanks those for buying their propaganda.

 

[Charles_Main]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Only he can't, The Constitution is pretty clear on this, not a lot of wiggle room. All Treaties must be ratified by Congress.

 

[The T]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Indeed...a total run-around from the Second Amendment. If he signs it? He and those idiots that ratify it in the Senate should be held on charges of Treason.

 

[rightwinger]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Myth.

Treaties must be approved by 2/3 Senate

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

 

[The T]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Myth.

Treaties must be approved by 2/3 Congress

WRONG...the US Senate.

Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2.

The 'Congress' portends both houses.

 

[g5000]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

I love it when people say "look it up". It is often an indication they are speaking out of their ass.

You are wrong twice over.

First, it must be ratified by the Senate, as others have pointed out.

Second, it has nothing to do with taking away your guns.

I have familiarized myself with the UN documentation and reports surrounding the treaty. There is no treaty yet, but a UN resolution confirmed our right to bear arms in the US as one of the foundations of that treaty which will be finished in a couple days.

The treaty has to do with the prevention of arms trafficking with terrorists, and has nothing to do with the derringer in your purse. It will affect the bottom line of arms manufacturers, so they are working overtime to make people like you believe this treaty means Obama will come for your guns next week.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Obama is already at the head of the UN Security Council which is an impeachable offense.
Obama has already said (along with Panetta) that the US Military works for the UN, an impeachable offense.
Obama has already given amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens, outside of law.

What makes you think Obama WON'T sign it into law and what makes you think the de-balled Congress will stop him?

Wakw up, we have a Dictator in the White House that doesn't give a SHITTE about the Constitution.

 

[g5000]

Obama is already at the head of the UN Security Council which is an impeachable offense.
Obama has already said (along with Panetta) that the US Military works for the UN, an impeachable offense.
Obama has already given amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens, outside of law.

What makes you think Obama WON'T sign it into law and what makes you think the de-balled Congress will stop him?

Wakw up, we have a Dictator in the White House that doesn't give a SHITTE about the Constitution.

See, you have a preconceived notion which says this treaty will take your guns. And so you think we should all oppose this treaty based on this notion.

However, your notion is wrong. Therefore, your conclusion we should oppose it is wrong.

The treaty deals with the problem of arms being sold to terrorists. Terrorists. Understand? Do you want arms to be continued to be sold to terrorists, or should something be done about it?

The decision of whether or not it should be ratified should be based on reality and the actual content of the treaty, not some nutso's delusions. We should read it and decide if it will diminish arms trafficking to terrorists.

You DO want to stop terrorism, don't you?

When it is released, let's read it. Then you can show us the part where Obama gets to come take your guns, okay?

 

[Politico]

he's gonna take our guns!

No he's not!

 

[The T]

Obama is already at the head of the UN Security Council which is an impeachable offense.
Obama has already said (along with Panetta) that the US Military works for the UN, an impeachable offense.
Obama has already given amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens, outside of law.

What makes you think Obama WON'T sign it into law and what makes you think the de-balled Congress will stop him?

Wakw up, we have a Dictator in the White House that doesn't give a SHITTE about the Constitution.

Who in either house has the BALLS to bring it up?

 

[OODA_Loop]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Myth.

Treaties must be approved by 2/3 Senate

snopes.com: Small Arms Treaty

So will Obama sign it anyway ? Tick. Tock.

 

[g5000]

What if Obama does sign the treaty? What exactly would that mean to you guys?

 

[rightwinger]

UN Small Arms Treaty, look it up. Obama wants to sign it into law vie Executive Order.

Myth.

Treaties must be approved by 2/3 Senate

snopes.com: Small Arms Treaty

So will Obama sign it anyway ? Tick. Tock.

He can't

Tick Tock

 

[AquaAthena]

Bahahahaha. The left used to say mocking what they saw as pseudo fear in gun lovin' 'merkins.

Well, one little event and seems a lot likelier now doesn't it?

It won't happen, in my opinion. Too many Dems love their right to bear arms, as do the rest of us.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Obama is already at the head of the UN Security Council which is an impeachable offense.
Obama has already said (along with Panetta) that the US Military works for the UN, an impeachable offense.
Obama has already given amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens, outside of law.

What makes you think Obama WON'T sign it into law and what makes you think the de-balled Congress will stop him?

Wakw up, we have a Dictator in the White House that doesn't give a SHITTE about the Constitution.

Wrong about the presidency of the UN Security Council.............

The role of president of the Security Council involves setting the agenda, presiding at its meetings and overseeing any crisis. The President is authorized to issue both presidential statements (subject to consensus among Council members) and notes,[5][6] which are used to make declarations of intent that the full Security Council can then pursue.[6] The Presidency rotates monthly in alphabetical order of the Security Council member nations' names in English.[7]

United Nations Security Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Got links that Obama said the US Military works for the UN?

As far as the amnesty? The Dream Act really isn't amnesty, because there are conditions you have to meet to qualify to stay.