Herman Cain's Blame List Thus Far. Hint: No Personal Responsibility

Cain has 5 women saying he sexually harassed them.

Is this a fact RWers?

So....!

There is still NO PROOF!!!!!

Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

Have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser? Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .
 
Cain has 5 women saying he sexually harassed them.

Is this a fact RWers?

So....!

There is still NO PROOF!!!!!

Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

OK... apply the same standards here then.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...a-gay-relationship-while-high-on-cocaine.html

I dare you!!
 

So....!

There is still NO PROOF!!!!!

Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

Have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser? Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

The sexual harassment occurred in the 1990's.

The women did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.
 
DES MOINES, Iowa — A conservative Iowa radio host, who on Wednesday became the latest person to accuse Herman Cain of acting inappropriately toward women, declined to offer specifics about the presidential candidate’s behavior but suggested that Cain was “compromised in his private life.”

Steve Deace, who hosts a syndicated two-hour radio program in Iowa, said that two of his female staff members were subjected to “inappropriate and awkward” comments by Cain. But he refused to identify them or elaborate on the seriousness of the allegations.

After his show on Wednesday night, Deace held an impromptu press conference outside his Des Moines studio while his two female staff members rushed out of the building, escorted by two men who attempted to keep reporters away.

One of the women was identified to ABC News by an independent source as a victim of the behavior Deace mentioned. Both of the women repeatedly refused to comment on anything related to the controversy.

Deace, an influential conservative figure in the state, declined to say whether he had the women’s consent before going public with the allegations, but added, “As a staff we are very tight and we are very close and we share everything with one another.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-herman-cain-compromised-in-his-private-life/
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGQ-ISsDm8M]Where are the white women at? - YouTube[/ame]
 
Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

Have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser? Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

The sexual harassment occurred in the 1990's.

The women did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.

What does the 1990's have do do with anything?


In the history of mankind have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser?
and let's not forget about this part also
Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .
 
Have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser? Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

The sexual harassment occurred in the 1990's.

The women did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.

What does the 1990's have do do with anything?


In the history of mankind have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser?
and let's not forget about this part also
Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

Like I said, they did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.
 
DES MOINES, Iowa — A conservative Iowa radio host, who on Wednesday became the latest person to accuse Herman Cain of acting inappropriately toward women, declined to offer specifics about the presidential candidate’s behavior but suggested that Cain was “compromised in his private life.”

Steve Deace, who hosts a syndicated two-hour radio program in Iowa, said that two of his female staff members were subjected to “inappropriate and awkward” comments by Cain. But he refused to identify them or elaborate on the seriousness of the allegations.

After his show on Wednesday night, Deace held an impromptu press conference outside his Des Moines studio while his two female staff members rushed out of the building, escorted by two men who attempted to keep reporters away.

One of the women was identified to ABC News by an independent source as a victim of the behavior Deace mentioned. Both of the women repeatedly refused to comment on anything related to the controversy.

Deace, an influential conservative figure in the state, declined to say whether he had the women’s consent before going public with the allegations, but added, “As a staff we are very tight and we are very close and we share everything with one another.”

Iowa Radio Host Steve Deace Calls Herman Cain ‘Compromised In His Private Life’ - ABC News
The media should not expose these women's names or identities. However, it's probably just a matter of time. They work for that popular guy and all any two-bit reporter has to do is follow the trail and connect the dots to put 2 and 2 together.
 
The sexual harassment occurred in the 1990's.

The women did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.

What does the 1990's have do do with anything?


In the history of mankind have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser?
and let's not forget about this part also
Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

Like I said, they did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.

You are not answering the question chris.

Have people in the past been falsely convict or accused by a number of people?
 
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-herman-cain-compromised-in-his-private-life/

DES MOINES, Iowa — A conservative Iowa radio host, who on Wednesday became the latest person to accuse Herman Cain of acting inappropriately toward women, declined to offer specifics about the presidential candidate’s behavior but suggested that Cain was “compromised in his private life.”

Steve Deace, who hosts a syndicated two-hour radio program in Iowa, said that two of his female staff members were subjected to “inappropriate and awkward” comments by Cain. But he refused to identify them or elaborate on the seriousness of the allegations.

After his show on Wednesday night, Deace held an impromptu press conference outside his Des Moines studio while his two female staff members rushed out of the building, escorted by two men who attempted to keep reporters away.

One of the women was identified to ABC News by an independent source as a victim of the behavior Deace mentioned. Both of the women repeatedly refused to comment on anything related to the controversy.

Deace, an influential conservative figure in the state, declined to say whether he had the women’s consent before going public with the allegations, but added, “As a staff we are very tight and we are very close and we share everything with one another.”
 

So....!

There is still NO PROOF!!!!!

Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

how about bimbo's and liars looking for a paycheck

I wonder what would happen if reporters actually looked into whether or not our POTUS is a closet bisexual?

Larry Sinclair certainly believes he is. :eusa_whistle:
 
Eye witnesses are considered evidence.

And there are plenty of witnesses.

The proof will show up a some point. The reporters just need to do a little digging.

how about bimbo's and liars looking for a paycheck

I wonder what would happen if reporters actually looked into whether or not our POTUS is a closet bisexual?

Larry Sinclair certainly believes he is. :eusa_whistle:
The gift that keeps on giving
 
It is, isn't it?

Apparently, every thought one has about Cain is worth a new thread. Who knew?

Oh quite yerr whining...will ya!?!?

Remember "Weinergate?"

It was a nonstop bashingfest. And given the chance again, you righties will repeat it on another unsuspecting lib.

Cain made his bed, now he must lay in it. Pun intended.

You apparently didn't realize that Cali Girl likes to appoint herself moderator on here from time to time.





bullshit. what she had to say has nothing to do with "moderating" so your statement is a big flat phucked up phail.
 
God DAYUM, Malcolm Ex-Lax, but you are dense.

Let's say that you got accused of having engaged in sexual harassment of a woman at the work place 12 years ago.

Let's say that (although you are clearly a silly politically partisan hack troll) you happen not to have ever been a troglodyte of the kind that engages in sexual harassment. In other words, the claim, then, was false.

Let's say that your company agreed to a legal settlement with your false-accuser to make the stupidity go away for the cheapest possible legal cost.

Remember, you never touched her and you never said one untoward word to her. You made not one gesture and you muttered not one inappropriate bit of banter to her or in her presence. You were wholly innocent. But the company bean counters determined that the path of least resistance was the cheapest course and so they settled the complaint. You signed no agreement and neither you nor the company EVER accepted any blame on your behalf.

Now, 12 years later, while running for high elective office, this bullshit story re-emerges.

Should you be CRITICIZED for not accepting personal blame?

For an "act" you never committed?
 
Last edited:
What does the 1990's have do do with anything?


In the history of mankind have people been falsely accused in the past by more than one accuser?
and let's not forget about this part also
Why are these women coming forward now and not back in 2008 through 2010? Why wait until his poll numbers start coming up? I call it politics as usual and keep the black man down .

Like I said, they did not come forward. Someone else tipped off Politico.

You are not answering the question chris.

Have people in the past been falsely convict or accused by a number of people?

I did not think you would answer the question Chris.
 
God DAYUM, Malcolm Ex-Lax, but you are dense.

Let's say that you got accused of having engaged in sexual harassment of a woman at the work place 12 years ago.

Let's say that (although you are clearly a silly politically partisan hack troll) you happen not to have ever been a troglodyte of the kind that engages in sexual harassment. In other words, the claim, then, was false.

Let's say that your company agreed to a legal settlement with your false-accuser to make the stupidity go away for the cheapest possible legal cost.

Remember, you never touched her and you never said one untoward word to her. You made not one gesture and you muttered not one inappropriate bit of banter to her or in her presence. You were wholly innocent. But the company bean counters determined that the path of least resistance was the cheapest course and so they settled the complaint. You signed no agreement and neither you nor the company EVER accepted any blame on your behalf.

Now, 12 years later, while running for high elective office, this bullshit story re-emerges.

Should you be CRITICIZED for not accepting personal blame?

For an "act" you never committed?

That comment was to complicated for that one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top