At one of the many recent debates Mitt Romney was criticized for his role in cutting jobs as a profession. Which is a reasonable critique of a Presidential candidate. Why isn't Herman Cain scrutinized in the same manner? Why does he get away with just spouting half-wit pizza slogans? Fact is that media darling Herman has never created a job in his life. Herman's simplified timeline: Herman pushed a broom for the navy, as to dodge the draft (yet he is all for sending others to war). Herman failed at his IT job. Herman failed at Burger King. Herman failed at Godfathers (about 700 stores to about 500 under his tenure, cutting jobs and still losing sales) Herman gets job at FED with dubious credentials... Genuine question - How does a guy in 30 million+ debt suddenly get positioned in "oversight" of his debtor? Does that make sense to anyone? How is that not a obviously fraudulent move by the FED? Oh yeah lets not forget Herman's embezzling pension funds at Aquila. Seriously, Why is the media giving him a pass on all of this and focusing on the tired old "infidelity scandal", just like they did in '08 with McCain?