COMPLETE LIST: Deep State ‘Leaks’ With Zero Sources And Evidence In All Out Effort To Attack Trump

[Steve_McGarrett]

Focus on the media's sources in the list. It all points to zero evidence of President Trump specifically colluding with Russia.



HERE’S THE COMPLETE AND UPDATED LIST: Deep State ‘Leaks’ to Far Left MSM Outlets – With Analysis

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/leaks-still-from-far-left-msm-outlets-only-still-no-sources-and-still-all-out-effort-to-attack-president-trump/

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

No responses! I see the truth has neutralized the liberal posters from commenting.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

They dont want to face the truth that the people are on to their shenanigans.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

They dont want to face the truth that the people are on to their shenanigans.

Agreed!

 

[radical right]

They dont want to face the truth that the people are on to their shenanigans.

Agreed!

Trumpl just tweeted that all the white house leaks were fake.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

They dont want to face the truth that the people are on to their shenanigans.

Agreed!

Trumpl just tweeted that all the white house leaks were fake.

Link?

 

[radical right]

They dont want to face the truth that the people are on to their shenanigans.

Agreed!

Trumpl just tweeted that all the white house leaks were fake.

Link?

Read his tweets from today. Trump said any stories coming from unnamed white houe sources were fake news.

So all those white house loeaks. Fake news. Trump just said so.

 

[toobfreak]

Funny. That last one at top about Kushner------ now it is a "crime" needing investigation because he and the ambassador discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel? I think the democrats should be forced to foot the bill for all of this.

 

[radical right]

Funny. That last one at top about Kushner------ now it is a "crime" needing investigation because he and the ambassador discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel? I think the democrats should be forced to foot the bill for all of this.

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

 

[imawhosure]

Focus on the media's sources in the list. It all points to zero evidence of President Trump specifically colluding with Russia.



HERE’S THE COMPLETE AND UPDATED LIST: Deep State ‘Leaks’ to Far Left MSM Outlets – With Analysis

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/leaks-still-from-far-left-msm-outlets-only-still-no-sources-and-still-all-out-effort-to-attack-president-trump/

Notice, every day, a new problem.

Know what the left has? A BIG problem, because the administration is going to get on or more of these people, and they are going to sing like little birds, as they melt like snowflakes.

This is gonna be fast tracked, since it is national security at risk, and within 6 or 8 months, all the lefties on here will be changing their names as the whole narrative is going to flip!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Funny. That last one at top about Kushner------ now it is a "crime" needing investigation because he and the ambassador discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel? I think the democrats should be forced to foot the bill for all of this.

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

So barry broke the law?

 

[radical right]

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

So barry broke the law?

President Trump has a secure line to Putin, and several other world leaders. He used it when he called Putin and Turnbull.

Are you saying Obama used the russian embassy communications system, because that would be illegal.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Funny. That last one at top about Kushner------ now it is a "crime" needing investigation because he and the ambassador discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel? I think the democrats should be forced to foot the bill for all of this.

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

Reagan's team did with the Iranians before he took office. Obama did too!

 

[radical right]

Reagan's team did with the Iranians before he took office. Obama did too!

Ronald Reagan committed multiple acts of Treason. From negotiating with the Iranians over the hostages, to selling arms to Iran in trade for hostages.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

So barry broke the law?

President Trump has a secure line to Putin, and several other world leaders. He used it when he called Putin and Turnbull.

Are you saying Obama used the russian embassy communications system, because that would be illegal.

Think Iran and Val Jarrett.....

 

[busybee01]

Funny. That last one at top about Kushner------ now it is a "crime" needing investigation because he and the ambassador discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel? I think the democrats should be forced to foot the bill for all of this.

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.

Reagan's team did with the Iranians before he took office. Obama did too!

Never happened. Reagan nor his team had any contact with Iran. There is no deep state.

 

[radical right]

So barry broke the law?

Think Iran and Val Jarrett.....

Unless Obama planned to talk to the Iranians by using the russian embassy communication gear, or meeting with the Iranians and telling them classified information we got from Israel, I don't see a problem.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Barry invoked executive privilege and Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress for the "FAST AND THE FURIOUS" gun running scandal.

Fact checkers? Can you check that?

Check, "FAST AND FURIOUS" and Obama "EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE" and Holder "CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS".

 

[toobfreak]

Setting up secret communication with an enemy of the US, is called espionage. There are laws against it.[/QUOTE]


BULL. A back channel is not a "secret communication." A better term might be 'secure.' And you obviously do not understand espionage. Better go get some facts. Every president has these, and any more, it looks to be an absolute necessity because all of the "spying," espionage and treason has been coming from Obama, the democrats, NYT and WaPo.

 

[toobfreak]

So barry broke the law?

Barry is a treasonous pig who ought to be hauled in, strung up and hung. ALL OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS are for ONE END. To keep the democrats out of the limelight. They hope that by the end, if Trump dares to suggest investigating any of them, the public outcry for another investigation will be overwhelming.