Here's a whole passel of scientists who think AGW is wrong

[westwall]

Frank, you totally stupid ass, we have already seen the proof right here on this planet, that increasing the CO2 from 280 to 387 increases the heat that the planet retains. And, given that there are all too many idiots like you, we will see how much heat that 600 ppm causes to be retained.

If that is true why has the temperature been dropping for the last 12 years bucko? La Nina explains why it is happening now. But according to your theory it should have been climbing the entire time and it clearly has not been doing that now has it? Even Phil Jones had to admit that inconvenient fact.

Come on, Walleyes, cease with the constant lying. Temperatures have been dropping in the last 12 years? 2000 to 2009 was the warmest on record, with 2005 tying 1998 for temperatures.

NASA - NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years

NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years WASHINGTON -- A new analysis of global surface temperatures by NASA scientists finds the past year was tied for the second warmest since 1880. In the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year on record.

Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade because of a strong La Nina that cooled the tropical Pacific Ocean, 2009 saw a return to a near-record global temperatures as the La Nina diminished, according to the new analysis by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. The past year was a small fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the warmest on record, putting 2009 in a virtual tie with a cluster of other years --1998, 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2007 -- for the second warmest on record.

"There's always interest in the annual temperature numbers and a given year's ranking, but the ranking often misses the point," said James Hansen, GISS director. "There's substantial year-to-year variability of global temperature caused by the tropical El Nino-La Nina cycle. When we average temperature over five or ten years to minimize that variability, we find global warming is continuing unabated."

So we are to take the yap-yap of a poster on a message board as more knowledgable than NASA? Come on, dingleberry, that old song and dance has been disproven so many times.

Is this the same NASA that admitted that their data was inferior to the CRU's data? And is that the same CRU that then had to admit that they had lost ALL of their raw data(now there's some credible scientists at work for you), cause if that's who you're talking about then no I wouldn't trust anything they say because they have allready PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT THEY HAVE NOTHING YOU IDIOT

Also (and I'm sure this is going to frost your balls old fraud) GISS's Gavin Schmidt credited WUWT for spotting mistakes in GISS data, oh my!

GISS’s Gavin Schmidt credits WUWT community with spotting the error | Watts Up With That?

So what exactly is your issue with WUWT? Seems the rest of the scientific community (even your boys) have no problem with it at all.

 

[westwall]

Frank, you totally stupid ass, we have already seen the proof right here on this planet, that increasing the CO2 from 280 to 387 increases the heat that the planet retains. And, given that there are all too many idiots like you, we will see how much heat that 600 ppm causes to be retained.

If that is true why has the temperature been dropping for the last 12 years bucko? La Nina explains why it is happening now. But according to your theory it should have been climbing the entire time and it clearly has not been doing that now has it? Even Phil Jones had to admit that inconvenient fact.

Phil Jones stated that it has cooled over the last 12 years? Post a link, boy.

You mean this one...which you've allready been avoiding for pages and pages and pages old fraud?

Climategate U-turn: Astonishment as scientist at centre of global warming email row admits data not well organised | Mail Online