HearSay Spoofing--Everyone Overhearing Trump White House Phone Calls(?)

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
So from late night evidence, the concept of "Hearsay" evidence--as a Republican Defense--is open even to Late Night ridicule, even world-wide. July 25,The President of Ukraine may already fled the room, out into the street--In the instant phone call moments. Trump phone calls appear to get heard all over(?).

https://nypost.com/2019/11/16/diplo...ne-call-discussing-investigations-in-ukraine/

Coming after the gangland threats to the personal safety, job security, reputation, (insert any other characterization) of the Ambassador witness--now even also broadcast worldwide, from a Tweet: HearSay is no longer a relevant concept in defense of the Trump Administration. The Boris Johnson leader of the English: Is even accused of death threat language in the proceedings of the Parliament.

Putting Trump in the coveted witness stand, (not): Then a remark about the female, "going to go through some things," coming off the notorious public record: Is loudly first-hand evidence shown worldwide. A gangland leader has a reputation. So does a sitting US President.

A sitting judge might have to clear the room: In the witness-stand example. The First Amendment right even stops at yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater, as a prank.

The Trump Administration should be told that there is other public reputation, even preceding the office-holding reputation itself. All of it has been heard worldwide, first-hand.

"Crow, James Crow:Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Matthew 25:14-30, even: Noted worldwide, and in writing for 500 years! The usury economy has a 2008-2009 kind of outcome!)
 
Godboy poster even has First Amendment rights, (also best not exercised(?))!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deity has no First Amendment rights, given the Usury economics, Moses Atrocity: Deut: 23:19-20, proving non-existence of any such fiction.)
 
Godboy poster even has First Amendment rights, (also best not exercised(?))!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deity has no First Amendment rights, given the Usury economics, Moses Atrocity: Deut: 23:19-20, proving non-existence of any such fiction.)
^ That didnt clear up anything. I still dont know what this thread is about.
 
The apparent intimidation acts are two. The first one is possibly public, heard into the streets of Kiev at the time--that President getting his ear as far away from the phone as he could. The second intimidation act is public to billions. There is no doubt of an attempt at "Tough Guy," and Gangland Leader type of discourse.

England even hears it from Boris Johnson.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Koran of no-deity would ban wealth from riba, but not usury economic. Modern-day banks of Dubai and Israel even buy cars, and charge a profit: When creating the payments program.)
 
So from late night evidence, the concept of "Hearsay" evidence--as a Republican Defense--is open even to Late Night ridicule, even world-wide. July 25,The President of Ukraine may already fled the room, out into the street--In the instant phone call moments. Trump phone calls appear to get heard all over(?).

https://nypost.com/2019/11/16/diplo...ne-call-discussing-investigations-in-ukraine/

Coming after the gangland threats to the personal safety, job security, reputation, (insert any other characterization) of the Ambassador witness--now even also broadcast worldwide, from a Tweet: HearSay is no longer a relevant concept in defense of the Trump Administration. The Boris Johnson leader of the English: Is even accused of death threat language in the proceedings of the Parliament.

Putting Trump in the coveted witness stand, (not): Then a remark about the female, "going to go through some things," coming off the notorious public record: Is loudly first-hand evidence shown worldwide. A gangland leader has a reputation. So does a sitting US President.

A sitting judge might have to clear the room: In the witness-stand example. The First Amendment right even stops at yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater, as a prank.

The Trump Administration should be told that there is other public reputation, even preceding the office-holding reputation itself. All of it has been heard worldwide, first-hand.

"Crow, James Crow:Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Matthew 25:14-30, even: Noted worldwide, and in writing for 500 years! The usury economy has a 2008-2009 kind of outcome!)
Trump needs to fire everybody-I'm sure Georgie porgie Conway has leaked stuff and spread rumors.
 
Rep. Stefanik would further go on, during the day, to disagree with the Trump Witness-intimidation Tweet: The Tweet happened in public, reported all over. Office of Management and Budget will possibly testify that the United States in fact spends a lot of money. The Budget process originates at the White House. "Pleasure of the President," can be taken to mean a blacklist--usually informal, not made public. Damage can be put into a lot of mechanisms, intending harm.

The Trump July 25, phone. . . .incident(?). . .may in fact have driven the people listening in, wherever in Ukraine: Into the streets, covering their ears--yelling at the people to all take cover. Rep. Stefanik may have overheard the call, herself(?): Especially if now regarded a GOP replacement for Donald Trump(?). Approaching real-time opportunities are even on schedule for next week. It seems to be known that Trump has a penchant for going beyond the legal in the matter of political rivals and opponents.

Trump tweets attack on ex-Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch

Trump has likely unlawfully even impounded money intended for New York, if recent widely public comments are properly, (or not), understood.

Analysts watch such matters, worldwide.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Simplest damage in Deut 23: 19-20, shown in Matt 24:14-30: Never rises even to "Unmentionable" status!)
 
I read all of that twice. I still dont know what youre talking about.
Hey, have you heard that Jeffery Epstein didn’t kill himself? I hear that too. That ought to be good enough to convict someone. Hillary maybe. If hearsay and memes are good enough to impeach the president, why not just go with it and solve the Epstein killing?

IMG_2258.jpg

Let's hear it for the power of hearsay!
 
The spoof of hearsay is that the the cellphone of the ambassador to the EU was picking up the White House phone call loud enough for everyone, anywhere in Ukraine to hear it. Ukraine is not a Trump Administration priority, but investigations into the Bidens are high priority, and self-aggrandizement: In the Trump Administration. Others point out that acts of public officials do meet Federal Exemptions to the hearsay inadmissible rules. Then there is the matter that Congress is not a Courtroom.

Republicans blasted 'hearsay' impeachment testimony. But they were in Congress, not court.

So what everyone is hearing in the Impeachment Inquiry is prima facie admissible. Even now qualifying as public information--and more recently now in the Spending Power of the US federal government: The admissible evidence is more or less rife in the federal budget.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Moses allegation of deity-directed usury--easily created from the backdrop of the subjugating Royal Household of the Egyptian enslaving Imperial Dynasties: Seems to work in so much of public policy(?)! Anti-Semitic policy worked wonderfully well in the Third German Republic, 1933-1945, for example. A relatively simple "Loyalty Test" was in place.)
 
The spoof of hearsay is that the the cellphone of the ambassador to the EU was picking up the White House phone call loud enough for everyone, anywhere in Ukraine to hear it. Ukraine is not a Trump Administration priority, but investigations into the Bidens are high priority, and self-aggrandizement: In the Trump Administration. Others point out that acts of public officials do meet Federal Exemptions to the hearsay inadmissible rules. Then there is the matter that Congress is not a Courtroom.

Republicans blasted 'hearsay' impeachment testimony. But they were in Congress, not court.

So what everyone is hearing in the Impeachment Inquiry is prima facie admissible. Even now qualifying as public information--and more recently now in the Spending Power of the US federal government: The admissible evidence is more or less rife in the federal budget.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Moses allegation of deity-directed usury--easily created from the backdrop of the subjugating Royal Household of the Egyptian enslaving Imperial Dynasties: Seems to work in so much of public policy(?)! Anti-Semitic policy worked wonderfully well in the Third German Republic, 1933-1945, for example. A relatively simple "Loyalty Test" was in place.)
It's still hearsay. I heard that Tony heard that Jane overheard Paul tell Fred that: Americans are never going to support removing the President, in an election, year, over a bunch mind-reading and hear-say.

THAT’S NOT THE NARRATIVE! Trump Surges with Suburban Women, Beats All 2020 Democrats in Large Donations.

“Trump’s re-election bid is being boosted by a surge in large-dollar donations from suburban women, the new report by OpenSecrets.org has revealed.The figures show that President Trump is receiving more big donations from the key demographic than any 2020 Democrat candidate.”​

When you are a successful President, raising wages and lowering unemployment and avoiding new wars, they let you just walk up and grab them by the pocketbook.
 
One Dubious, unlikely, Republican candidate $8.0 mil., 11 Democrat--all more likely candidates: $40.0 mil. in Suburban donations! The unlikely Republican Candidate, Donald Trump--is not winning in Surburbia--even likely among ants and aphids.

The Republicans are contending that even a police officer report, hearsay, is prima facie inadmissible which is not in the federal rules of evidence. Public Officers have a different standard applied.

The spoof of it all is the amassador having to hold the phone out at arm's length to take the corroborating phone call from the condemned-criminal-apparent, presiding in the White House.

An apparent good question could be to ask: Just who was not on the phone calls(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23:19-20, itself not thought a winning, world peace strategy(?)--a probable Holocaust cause!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top