Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…

[Doc7505]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

 

[Claudette]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

 

[Billiejeens]

On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains. -


yep

 

[wamose]

Democrats are a little unstable. They will believe anything and that's what makes them so easy to con. So when somebody with bugged out eyes, which seems to be a new Democratic trait, interprets a sentence to mean something it couldn't possibly mean, all the little lemmings say AHA!! Too crazy. This glove don't fit so you must acquit.

 

[RealDave]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

 

[Jitss617]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

Who heard what?

 

[Billiejeens]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

Democrats are a little unstable

hmm

 

[Claudette]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

The only way it isn't hearsay is if the two people you heard tell authorities. Its hearsay if its repeated by someone who is just repeating what they heard.

Hell. Hearsay isn't even legal in a court of law.

Hearsay is hearsay as much as you hate to admit it. LOL

 

[MAGAman]

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

Hahaha

hear·say
/ˈhirˌsā/
noun

1. information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
   "according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm"

Keep digging

 

[EvMetro]

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

Hearsay is the report of another person's words by a witness. Hearsay is just gossip.

 

[Nostra]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

It is the very definition of hearsay....


hearsay

Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to hearsay: hearsay rule, hearsay evidence
hear·say
(hîr′sā′)
n.
1. Unverified information heard or received from another; rumor.
2. Law Evidence that is not within the personal knowledge of a witness, such as testimony regarding statements made by someone other than the witness, and that therefore may be inadmissible to establish the truth of a particular contention because the accuracy of the evidence cannot be verified through cross-examination.

 

[MAGAman]

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

Hahaha...

So he didn't testify Trump did something wrong, he testified 2 people were talking.

That's even funnier.

Keep digging.

 

[Doc7505]

Hearing Highlights –
Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…​

Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
11/13/2019
Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


Comment:
Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.

I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

What a bunch of imbeciles.

If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.

It is the very definition of hearsay....


hearsay

Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to hearsay: hearsay rule, hearsay evidence
hear·say
(hîr′sā′)
n.
1. Unverified information heard or received from another; rumor.
2. Law Evidence that is not within the personal knowledge of a witness, such as testimony regarding statements made by someone other than the witness, and that therefore may be inadmissible to establish the truth of a particular contention because the accuracy of the evidence cannot be verified through cross-examination.

I'm going to mail that to Mr. Schitf, but I don't think it'll do any good.

 

[Zorro!]

MAYBE THE “SHADOW” FOREIGN POLICY WAS BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE KENT, VINDMAN, HILL, AND C*ARAMELLA?

The President, Not Diplomats, Sets ‘Official Foreign’ Policy.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It's funny watching Trump Humpers trying to justify wrong doing.