Health Care Ruling Shows Judicial Activism Is Alive and Well -- and Living on the Rig

Because you don't is not proof it is, you nattering nabob of nonsense.

What a stupid thing to say. If you think that this is judicial activism then the burden is on YOU to support that proposition. Otherwise, you're arguing from ignorance.

People wanting to call this "judicial activism," have you even read the decision? If not, then you cannot claim it is judicial activism because you don't even know what you're talking about. So far, I haven't been able to find the opinion available anywhere.

But....if this does turn out to be unconstitutional, and we accept that the government cannot force me to buy insurance, can I cancel my car insurance?


You need to focus on reading comprehension.
 
Because you don't is not proof it is, you nattering nabob of nonsense.

What a stupid thing to say. If you think that this is judicial activism then the burden is on YOU to support that proposition. Otherwise, you're arguing from ignorance.

People wanting to call this "judicial activism," have you even read the decision? If not, then you cannot claim it is judicial activism because you don't even know what you're talking about. So far, I haven't been able to find the opinion available anywhere.

But....if this does turn out to be unconstitutional, and we accept that the government cannot force me to buy insurance, can I cancel my car insurance?

Nope, you just can't have a car dummy, next .......
 
because you like the ruling is no proof its not judicial activism.
Proof is the constitution. The obamacare farce is unconstitutional. The judge made the right ruling, period. Let the left cry, boo hoo.

By not buying insurance an individual forces the people to pay for their healthcare.

How is that constitutional?



No they don't. You are jumping to that conclusion.

A great many people who choose not to have health insurance do so because they healthy and would rather pay out of pocket for minor routing care as it is less expensive than a policy they will likely not use.

The financial case for ObamaCare rests on forcing the young and healthy to pay far more for health insurance than they care to in order to subsidize the older and less healthy. It is yet another mugging of the young by the old government sponsored Ponzi Scheme.
 
Who the HELL is ADAM WINKLER and why the hell are we suppose to give a shit what he says?


:lol::eusa_whistle:

he's law professor, something you are not. Asswipe.

Law professors are only impressive to people who've never met a law professor.

By the way, I've decided from now on to neg rep anyone I find who starts a thread based on the Huffington Post, just on general principle. Unfortunately, I don't rep much, and I need to spread some reputation around before I can deal with Flaylo here. So everyone in this thread who thinks he's an ignorant jackwagon can have some rep.
 
he's law professor, something you are not. Asswipe.

And something Obama is not/was not as well.

You're an uneducated moron and you are wrong


FactCheck.org: Was Barack Obama really a constitutional law professor?

Read and weep dumbass.

And Obama gave up his law license for fucking lying on the app that he didn't have any aliases. And his wife was ordered to surrender it.

Great fucking legal roll models.
 
Because you don't is not proof it is, you nattering nabob of nonsense.

What a stupid thing to say. If you think that this is judicial activism then the burden is on YOU to support that proposition. Otherwise, you're arguing from ignorance.

People wanting to call this "judicial activism," have you even read the decision? If not, then you cannot claim it is judicial activism because you don't even know what you're talking about. So far, I haven't been able to find the opinion available anywhere.

But....if this does turn out to be unconstitutional, and we accept that the government cannot force me to buy insurance, can I cancel my car insurance?

good grief, who the hell is FORCING you to buy car insurance or even to DRIVE A CAR.
sheesh,:cuckoo:
 
because you like the ruling is no proof its not judicial activism.
Proof is the constitution. The obamacare farce is unconstitutional. The judge made the right ruling, period. Let the left cry, boo hoo.

By not buying insurance an individual forces the people to pay for their healthcare.

How is that constitutional?
Wrong. If an individual does not want to buy insurance it is his right not to. The gov't has no right to tell you you have to buy a certain product, that is socialism.
 
It is not stupid, obama citizenship has not even been proven therefore he can't legally be potus, but that is another thread. Point is the health care law is unconstitutional, period.

Yes, it's another thread.
Yes, his citizenship HAS been proven.
No, any attempts to move the goal post will not create a new question of supposed lack of citizenship or alleged insufficiency of evidence.
No, any argument from conspiracy will not create such a new question either, because it's imaginative speculation that flies against the evidence.
Yes, Obama's birth certificate has been made available, and his credentials to be President have been affirmed by all three branches of government.
Yes, you are stupid if you continue to insist on an alleged lack of constitutional qualification for Obama to hold office of POTUS, because you are believing something without any evidence to support it, and with established contradictory evidence.
 
Last edited:
because you like the ruling is no proof its not judicial activism.

What a stupid thing to say. If you think that this is judicial activism then the burden is on YOU to support that proposition. Otherwise, you're arguing from ignorance.

People wanting to call this "judicial activism," have you even read the decision? If not, then you cannot claim it is judicial activism because you don't even know what you're talking about. So far, I haven't been able to find the opinion available anywhere.

But....if this does turn out to be unconstitutional, and we accept that the government cannot force me to buy insurance, can I cancel my car insurance?

Car insurance is a little different. You're not technically forced to buy it. You're merely required to have it if you want to use public roads, like a driver's license. If, for example, you had a farm and a vehicle that you only ever drove on your farm - private property - the government wouldn't require you to have insurance on it.

And, of course, anyone who doesn't have a car is exempt from buying car insurance, as well.
 
because you like the ruling is no proof its not judicial activism.
Proof is the constitution. The obamacare farce is unconstitutional. The judge made the right ruling, period. Let the left cry, boo hoo.

By not buying insurance an individual forces the people to pay for their healthcare.

How is that constitutional?

No, jackwads like YOU force us to pay for their healthcare, with your mealymouthed "I want to feel like a good person, so let's tax other people" bullshit. And you're right; it's NOT Constitutional for you and your leftist ilk to do that.
 
because you like the ruling is no proof its not judicial activism.

What a stupid thing to say. If you think that this is judicial activism then the burden is on YOU to support that proposition. Otherwise, you're arguing from ignorance.

People wanting to call this "judicial activism," have you even read the decision? If not, then you cannot claim it is judicial activism because you don't even know what you're talking about. So far, I haven't been able to find the opinion available anywhere.

But....if this does turn out to be unconstitutional, and we accept that the government cannot force me to buy insurance, can I cancel my car insurance?

Auto insurance is required if you choose to buy an automoblie. This health insurance mandates give you no choice.
 
So what do you think this country would look like if people could be refused emergency medical care because they could not pay?
 
Here's another great legal mind on the left.... :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
good grief, who the hell is FORCING you to buy car insurance or even to DRIVE A CAR.
sheesh,:cuckoo:

Good grief, someone presents a thoughtful perspective that you can't wrap your mind around, so the MUST be crazy, right?

The state government forces me to buy car insurance. I can't drive without it.
Transportation is an essential necessity in order to perform the functions of every day life.
Therefore, having car insurance is a necessity in order to perform the functions of every day life.

But hey, I really don't have a problem with my car insurance. But the idea that it is unconstitutional for the government to require you to have insurance would mean that every state out there is unconstitutionally requiring people to buy car insurance. Ultimately, nobody forces me to drive, but nobody forces me to go to the hospital either. They are both decisions that I may make in order to provide for basic needs.
 
Proof is the constitution. The obamacare farce is unconstitutional. The judge made the right ruling, period. Let the left cry, boo hoo.

By not buying insurance an individual forces the people to pay for their healthcare.

How is that constitutional?
Wrong. If an individual does not want to buy insurance it is his right not to. The gov't has no right to tell you you have to buy a certain product, that is socialism.

Yep.

The young and healthy are a big part of the equation.

Loads of young people don't buy insurance because they don't think they will need it. Under Obamacare they will be forced to buy something they don't want. Thats the only way there will be enough money to subsidize those that don't have insurance.

Those that have will get hosed to provide for those that don't have.

That my work for some on this board but it sure a shit don't work for me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top