Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Jesus of Nazareth first proposed the the "Make-Work-Pay" Refundable, equal amount tax credit in Matthew 20::1-16. The Laborers in the field got an equal amount, regardless if they had worked all the day, or only the one hour. A work-day was actually shorter. So with the daily cost-of-living amount, then the laborers were off to the market place to get what they needed, or do other business.
The Republicans took Schedule M away. That was the "Make-Work-Pay" $400.00 per adult plan, now not available: This tax season.
Cash-for-Clunkers was similarly modeled, to prime the pump for auto-makers.
Aspects of the Stimulus remain in place.
ObamaCare may yet past muster, or parts of it--into the summer.
So in contrast to the do-nothing Congesses as usual, the Conservatives ran into a legislature that actually did something.
In the midterms, they managed to take some of it away.
Subsequent the midterms, The Republicans managed to get the credit rating of the entire United States downgraded.
Anyone notes that they seem to have plan(?)! Soon there will be a larger turnout of the noticing-as-usual!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Good Ship LollyPop Is Their Plan! Get well on that plan, if you can(?)!)
Did the Senate leave anything out in their haste to pass the bill before the 41st vote showed up? As a matter of fact, yes they did: Severability. In the house Bill they included the clause that if any one part of the bill was ruled unconstitutional, the rest would still be in force.
Both chambers' legislative drafting manuals specify, based on Supreme Court precedents, that severability clauses are not required; only non-severability clauses explicitly identifying provisions that can not be severed are needed.
In other words, if they wanted anything to be non-severable from the rest of the law, they had to explicitly say so. The absence of any such clause comes with the presumption that in fact all provisions are severable.
That's why the Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court's ruling out of Florida and severed the individual mandate.
Jesus of Nazareth first proposed the the "Make-Work-Pay" Refundable, equal amount tax credit in Matthew 20::1-16. The Laborers in the field got an equal amount, regardless if they had worked all the day, or only the one hour. A work-day was actually shorter. So with the daily cost-of-living amount, then the laborers were off to the market place to get what they needed, or do other business.
The Republicans took Schedule M away. That was the "Make-Work-Pay" $400.00 per adult plan, now not available: This tax season.
Cash-for-Clunkers was similarly modeled, to prime the pump for auto-makers.
Aspects of the Stimulus remain in place.
ObamaCare may yet past muster, or parts of it--into the summer.
So in contrast to the do-nothing Congesses as usual, the Conservatives ran into a legislature that actually did something.
In the midterms, they managed to take some of it away.
Subsequent the midterms, The Republicans managed to get the credit rating of the entire United States downgraded.
Anyone notes that they seem to have plan(?)! Soon there will be a larger turnout of the noticing-as-usual!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Good Ship LollyPop Is Their Plan! Get well on that plan, if you can(?)!)
Funny, i had the right to purchase health care and health insurance prior to Obamacare being passed. What rights, exactly, was I given by the government telling people what they can or cant do?
If there is a right to health care, it is not satisfied by a right to purchase health care or health insurance, unless those are cheap enough that everyone can afford them.
Purchasing a Rolls-Royce is a privilege, not a right, even though there is no LEGAL obstacle in the way for anyone.
I had heard in the past that the bill was 2300 pages long and you had corrected me saying that the bill was far fewer pages.
"By allowing people to avoid buying insurance until they need it, and then requiring insurers to cover anyone who comes knocking at their door regardless of medical condition, you create a risk pool of exclusively sick people."
"This is a recipe for financial catastrophe, all but ensuring that premiums rocket skyward and thus making health insurance less affordable and accessible for everyone. That's not political ideology talking; it's simple economics."
This is exactly the ridiculous and disastrous situation ObamaCare created in the legislation, yes. That's why Justice Kennedy asked, "Can you create commerce in order to regulate it?"Get ready for....
SINGLE-PAYER!!!!!
.
.
"In medicine, physicians use their training and experience to diagnose and treat patient ills. Over the years, I have witnessed a new condition, not covered in any of my medical school lectures or text books, that is at epidemic proportions and worsening. The condition is caused by an out-of-control parasite - the for-profit medical insurance industry.
Decreasing pharmacy benefits, increasing copays and out-of-sight deductibles coupled with diminished coverage for care are the symptoms - and there is no foreseeable cure. The for-profit insurance system covers the healthiest Americans and has perfected the art of sucking more and more money from business/patients (higher premiums) and providers (diminished payments) while increasing profits for their executives and shareholders. The governmental programs (Medicare, Veterans Affairs and Medicaid) that are responsible for our elderly, veterans and poor are also cutting back, but these patients are not experiencing the incredibly large increase in out-of-pocket expenses and rarely see a loss of expected services.
A single-payer system is not a "government takeover of medicine." Rather, it is a shift in the financing of health care and would end the inefficiencies and greed of the for-profit insurance industry. It would be the best option to control medical costs and improve health outcomes. A single-payer health-care system (not for-profit) is essential if America wants to have a sustainable future."
Keep trying to spin it that way OP....but it will not work. Your buffoons screwed around and then shoveled a 2000 page unconstitutional pile of dung down our throats. It needs to burn.
Jesus of Nazareth first proposed the the "Make-Work-Pay" Refundable, equal amount tax credit in Matthew 20::1-16. The Laborers in the field got an equal amount, regardless if they had worked all the day, or only the one hour. A work-day was actually shorter. So with the daily cost-of-living amount, then the laborers were off to the market place to get what they needed, or do other business.
The Republicans took Schedule M away. That was the "Make-Work-Pay" $400.00 per adult plan, now not available: This tax season.
Cash-for-Clunkers was similarly modeled, to prime the pump for auto-makers.
Aspects of the Stimulus remain in place.
ObamaCare may yet past muster, or parts of it--into the summer.
So in contrast to the do-nothing Congesses as usual, the Conservatives ran into a legislature that actually did something.
In the midterms, they managed to take some of it away.
Subsequent the midterms, The Republicans managed to get the credit rating of the entire United States downgraded.
Anyone notes that they seem to have plan(?)! Soon there will be a larger turnout of the noticing-as-usual!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Good Ship LollyPop Is Their Plan! Get well on that plan, if you can(?)!)
Paul writes in Thessalonians 3:10-12:
"If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat. For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work but busybodies. Now such persons we command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their own work quietly and to earn their own living."
"On a recent Christmas, Charles and Adrienne sent out cards that showed them walking hand in hand with their backs to the camera, according to a close friend. It said, going home."
I had heard in the past that the bill was 2300 pages long and you had corrected me saying that the bill was far fewer pages.
This isn't something you need to "hear" or take on faith: open the document. The fact that Scalia also seems to have never looked at the text of the law (evidenced not only by his Tea Party-inspired page miscount but also his reference to the non-existent Cornhusker kickback) is similarly disconcerting.
All of which supposes that the health care bill was popular and desired by the public. Which isn't true.
All of which supposes that the health care bill was popular and desired by the public. Which isn't true.
Actually when you ask people if they approve of the separate provisions of the health care bill they overwhelming approve of it.
And those who cannot pay as much get care that's paid for by those who can.Funny, i had the right to purchase health care and health insurance prior to Obamacare being passed. What rights, exactly, was I given by the government telling people what they can or cant do?
If there is a right to health care, it is not satisfied by a right to purchase health care or health insurance, unless those are cheap enough that everyone can afford them.
Purchasing a Rolls-Royce is a privilege, not a right, even though there is no LEGAL obstacle in the way for anyone.
The right to purchase Healthcare Insurance and the right to have healthcare are two separate things.
In Indianapolis, we have several very good hospital organizations. One of them provides services and cost is based on the ability to pay. Nobody is denied healthcare.
The argument that healthcare is denied because insurance is not issued is devious, dishonest and a diversion.
Another Trolling thread... Don't you guys get tired of it?
