Head of Independence Hall Tea Party in NJ wants Public Schools to "go away"

Discussion in 'Education' started by Modbert, Jul 11, 2011.

  1. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    Braun: Advocates of privatized education want to end public schools | NJ.com

    Thoughts USMB?
     
  2. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Good.
     
  3. Dot Com
    Offline

    Dot Com Nullius in verba Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    49,283
    Thanks Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Fairfax, NoVA
    Ratings:
    +16,238
    Oh well, at least they'll drive independents right into the Democrats waiting, open arms ;)
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2011
  4. martybegan
    Online

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,287
    Thanks Received:
    4,000
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,915
    I consider myself a libertarianish conservative and I see a need for public schools. The current model however, is far from perfect.

    Schools need to get away from social engineering and concentrate on the basics. They should also identify students by ability and try to focus them on areas that interest them or the educators see as viable paths for the student in the future.

    We have gotten into the cookie cutter method of education, with everyone trying to teach everyone the same thing, regardless of their ability to learn it. Schools have become a combination of a daycare system and a self esteem factory, and have lost thier primary reason, to educate people for the adult world.

    Education from 1-3 should be used to identify academic minded students, and those that need additonal help. by high school specialization should begin preparing students for further education, or start aiming them at a trade.

    Before people get into classism people in trades with ambition and effort can make more money than people with an academic background. It would be to thier advantage to start early. If they want to later go to school to learn about business and such they can do it later.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Another dishonest Doggie thread.

    You couldn't think for yourself if your life depended on it.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    Do tell how this is dishonest.
     
  7. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,598
    Thanks Received:
    6,683
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,473
    More and more people are speaking out against the public school system because it has become incredibly expensive and is failing at its responsibility. Does that mean we should get rid of public schools? No, but they need a major overhaul and any time anybody tries to change the status quo the "educrats" and the unions take to the streets with their scare tactics.

    That's what makes it so refreshing to see someone like Chris Christie telling them to stick it up their asses.
     
  8. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    Representative of rightist extremism designed to create a de facto class system where those who can afford to educate their children (read: ‘worthy’) can, and the poor go with no education. The dogma is predicated on the fallacy that parents – faced with the prospect of their children receiving no education – will prepare themselves better and work harder to ensure their children might go to school.

    Such a plan is morally reprehensible and potentially un-Constitutional, see: Weber v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (1972).
     
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    What a crock of shit.

    Returning education to the realm of fee-for-service will merely call for parents to bear the r-r-r-r-responsibility of educating their kids, just like they already do in feeding, clothing and housing them.

    What's morally reprehensible is shaking down those who, for whatever reason, don't want -or worse can't have- children to pay for the breeders.
     

Share This Page