Has Obama done ANYTHING as president?

Dean doesn't my comment get a reply from you?......or if its something negative you wont comment because you cant dispel what i said?....the guy has pushed this Country farther apart then Bush had it and he is a piss poor leader.....those two facts right there are more important than what you brought up BECAUSE the divide in this Country will bring about the downfall of it.....people working together will overcome Economic problems......you said the right hated Clinton.....he managed to keep the divide from becoming the Grand Canyon.....with Bush it became that.....now unless it stops it is becoming The Valles Marineris ..............
Deany will never admit to it. He want total obedience and capitulation to Obama.

i want to see him blame the Republicans....Clinton had to deal with them.....and he did not let the divide get out of control like the last 2 have done......Carter dealt with it too,and some things were bad under Carter.....what happened to Bush and Obama?.....i think its called.....no leadership skills.....just follow all the voices around you....
 
Dean doesn't my comment get a reply from you?......or if its something negative you wont comment because you cant dispel what i said?....the guy has pushed this Country farther apart then Bush had it and he is a piss poor leader.....those two facts right there are more important than what you brought up BECAUSE the divide in this Country will bring about the downfall of it.....people working together will overcome Economic problems......you said the right hated Clinton.....he managed to keep the divide from becoming the Grand Canyon.....with Bush it became that.....now unless it stops it is becoming The Valles Marineris ..............
Deany will never admit to it. He want total obedience and capitulation to Obama.

i want to see him blame the Republicans....Clinton had to deal with them.....and he did not let the divide get out of control like the last 2 have done......Carter dealt with it too,and some things were bad under Carter.....what happened to Bush and Obama?.....i think its called.....no leadership skills.....just follow all the voices around you....

I have some questions for you.

  • When did Obama shoot anyone?
  • Which gun laws did Obama expand?
  • What sweeping changes were made to the patent laws?
  • How does loosing 3.3 million jobs beat Bush's atrocious record of 1.01 million jobs created?
Those are just the obvious questions after glancing at your post and its outrageous claims. I will await your answers, even though I expect you to pretend I never actually asked the questions.


OK

President Obama signs patent reform legislation | Business Law Daily

Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks

Shot in the Face, Buried at Sea - Culture - Fox Nation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

That was from Post #70 and highlights the real problem.

And the reply from the person asking the question?

I asked specifically about your claim that the changes were sweeping.
That patent reform law was far from sweeping.

In other words, he signed it in spite of, not because of, the gun laws. It certainly does not count as having "expanded gun laws more than any other president in history."

Now we get back to pointing out the obvious, even if bin Laden was shot in the face, Obama did not shoot him.


See? No matter what Obama does, it doesn't count.

And especially, about Bin Laden. Obama shot Bin Laden in the face. He didn't use a gun, he used a US Military Ranger carrying a gun. Even more deadly.

It's the skin color. Obama didn't create the "divide". Republican racism did and the more honest will not only admit it, but proudly announce it. We all know that to be true. Not something that can be denied.

Carrying concealed and loaded weapons into a national park nothing? Yea, nothing. Hilarious.
 
What exactly has Obama done in the nearly three years he's been president. Why would anyone call him a leader? All he did was:

Save the auto industry
Pass Health Care (unpopular because health care is bad)
Stopped a depression
stimulated by the economy to the tune of a couple of million jobs
ended Don't ask Don't tell
shot Bin Laden in the faceexpanded gun laws more than any other president in history
sweeping change in patent laws
got rid of Qaddafi without the loss of a single American life
Saved Christmas for millions of Americans whose unemployment was about to be cut off
moved tens of thousands of soldiers out of Iraq
two female Supreme Court Justices
Provided travel expenses to families of fallen soldiers to be on hand when the body arrives
Reversed the policy of barring media coverage during the return of fallen soldiers
Provided the Department of Veterans Affairs with more than $1.4 billion
Require HC to disclose how much of the premium actually goes to patient care
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to look out for the interests of everyday Americans
law requiring lenders to verify applicants' credit history, income, and employment status
Cut prescription drug cost for medicare recipients by 50%
Policies that created more private sector jobs in 2010 than during entire Bush years
New START Treaty - nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia

And he did the after inheriting two wars, a 10 trillion dollar deficit, an exhausted military, a trashed Justice Department, a deregulated Wall Street and a broken economy.

At the same time, fighting a political party who only goal was to destroy his presidency, who wanted him brought down, even before he was sworn in. A party that voted time and again against their own proposals and policies and against the interests of their base, in an attempt to ruin the President of the United States. A party that insisted he's not "American". That he's a Manchurian Candidate. A conspiracy. A man who did everything right, except be born white.

Do we really need to list Republican achievements during the six LOOOOONG years they held both houses, the presidency and had a majority in the Supreme Court? It's a very short list. So short I couldn't think of a single positive thing.

Imagine what Obama could have done if Republicans could get past his skin color?

He sat in a fucking chair and watched it happen. An order that any jackass, including your party mascott, would have given

An order that Bush didn't give. Oops, too bad.
 
Deany will never admit to it. He want total obedience and capitulation to Obama.

i want to see him blame the Republicans....Clinton had to deal with them.....and he did not let the divide get out of control like the last 2 have done......Carter dealt with it too,and some things were bad under Carter.....what happened to Bush and Obama?.....i think its called.....no leadership skills.....just follow all the voices around you....

I have some questions for you.

  • When did Obama shoot anyone?
  • Which gun laws did Obama expand?
  • What sweeping changes were made to the patent laws?
  • How does loosing 3.3 million jobs beat Bush's atrocious record of 1.01 million jobs created?
Those are just the obvious questions after glancing at your post and its outrageous claims. I will await your answers, even though I expect you to pretend I never actually asked the questions.


OK

President Obama signs patent reform legislation | Business Law Daily

Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks

Shot in the Face, Buried at Sea - Culture - Fox Nation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

That was from Post #70 and highlights the real problem.

And the reply from the person asking the question?

I asked specifically about your claim that the changes were sweeping.
That patent reform law was far from sweeping.

In other words, he signed it in spite of, not because of, the gun laws. It certainly does not count as having "expanded gun laws more than any other president in history."

Now we get back to pointing out the obvious, even if bin Laden was shot in the face, Obama did not shoot him.


See? No matter what Obama does, it doesn't count.

And especially, about Bin Laden. Obama shot Bin Laden in the face. He didn't use a gun, he used a US Military Ranger carrying a gun. Even more deadly.

It's the skin color. Obama didn't create the "divide". Republican racism did and the more honest will not only admit it, but proudly announce it. We all know that to be true. Not something that can be denied.

Carrying concealed and loaded weapons into a national park nothing? Yea, nothing. Hilarious.
where did i question those questions?.....i think you got the wrong poster .....now answer my question from post 79......remember the divide started under Bush....a white guy.....not Obama.....it's gotten a lot worse under him....and when our exalted "Leader" says the things he says about the other half of the Country....it just makes that divide grow.....but then,you are like that too.....so to you to have this Country fragment is no doubt is what you and your FAR Left buddies want....he is no leader Dean....Clinton our 1st black President brought people together.....whats this guys problem?....its called no people skills which means no Leadership capability.......
 
The truth is no matter what he does, for the right it's not enough. You guys hate him that much. He did expand gun laws. Business says the patent laws were a sweeping change and Bin Laden was shot in the face after Republicans LET HIM GO.

It's the skin. It's why Republicans insist he wasn't born here. Why he must be "Muslim". Why he couldn't have been a good student at Harvard. Why they call him "boy" and "Man Child" (another name for boy).

There is nothing radical about Obama. In fact, Bush was way, way more radical than Obama. It's not Obama that's "divided the country". It's racist right wingers. A political party that runs on ignorance and meanness that's based int he deep south. The party that "cheers" when executions are announced. The party of "let him die". The party of anti-education, anti science. The party that said they wanted him to "fail" even before he was sworn in as president. The "torture" party.

A party so dirty they would let millions of unemployed Americans suffer to give favors to the "rich".

This is why the Right Wingers hate me. I hold up their picture and they don't like what they see. So they scream "liar" and call names. The truth is the truth. It's who right wingers are. Deal with it.

You said he expanded gun laws more than any president in history, I want proof, not whinging.

A business, or a politician, saying something is sweeping does not make it weeping. Why was the patent reform law sweeping?

We do not know if bin Laden was shot in the face, We do know that some news agencies, notably Fox, which won the right to lie in court, says it is he was. It does not really matter though, because Obama did not shoot him.

Which of us was the first to mention anything about skin in this conversation? How does you bringing up the trivial fact that Obama is darker than previous presidents make me a racist?

Obama continued every single Bush policy you label as radical. In fact, he expanded most of them, and ordered the execution of an American citizen without a trial. Not sure why you think that makes Bush the radical one, but I never saw any evidence you could think before this, so I do not expect anything different now.

I cannot speak for everyone, so it is possible that some right wingers might hate you, but I know I do not. I actually feel sorry for everyone who has to put up with you in real life. You really are pathetic.
 
I cannot speak for everyone, so it is possible that some right wingers might hate you, but I know I do not. I actually feel sorry for everyone who has to put up with you in real life. You really are pathetic.

aint that the fucking truth..........people see this guy coming,im sure they all look at their watches and say..."holy shit look at the time,gotta go".....
 
Has Obama done ANYTHING as president?

yeah. he fucked up our country.

You guys can't admit. It's his country too. And you fucked it up, down and sideways before he was elected into office by a majority of Americans. People Republicans are trying to keep from voting next time.
 
i want to see him blame the Republicans....Clinton had to deal with them.....and he did not let the divide get out of control like the last 2 have done......Carter dealt with it too,and some things were bad under Carter.....what happened to Bush and Obama?.....i think its called.....no leadership skills.....just follow all the voices around you....

I have some questions for you.

  • When did Obama shoot anyone?
  • Which gun laws did Obama expand?
  • What sweeping changes were made to the patent laws?
  • How does loosing 3.3 million jobs beat Bush's atrocious record of 1.01 million jobs created?
Those are just the obvious questions after glancing at your post and its outrageous claims. I will await your answers, even though I expect you to pretend I never actually asked the questions.


OK

President Obama signs patent reform legislation | Business Law Daily

Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks

Shot in the Face, Buried at Sea - Culture - Fox Nation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

That was from Post #70 and highlights the real problem.

And the reply from the person asking the question?

I asked specifically about your claim that the changes were sweeping.
That patent reform law was far from sweeping.

In other words, he signed it in spite of, not because of, the gun laws. It certainly does not count as having "expanded gun laws more than any other president in history."

Now we get back to pointing out the obvious, even if bin Laden was shot in the face, Obama did not shoot him.


See? No matter what Obama does, it doesn't count.

And especially, about Bin Laden. Obama shot Bin Laden in the face. He didn't use a gun, he used a US Military Ranger carrying a gun. Even more deadly.

It's the skin color. Obama didn't create the "divide". Republican racism did and the more honest will not only admit it, but proudly announce it. We all know that to be true. Not something that can be denied.

Carrying concealed and loaded weapons into a national park nothing? Yea, nothing. Hilarious.
where did i question those questions?.....i think you got the wrong poster .....now answer my question from post 79......remember the divide started under Bush....a white guy.....not Obama.....it's gotten a lot worse under him....and when our exalted "Leader" says the things he says about the other half of the Country....it just makes that divide grow.....but then,you are like that too.....so to you to have this Country fragment is no doubt is what you and your FAR Left buddies want....he is no leader Dean....Clinton our 1st black President brought people together.....whats this guys problem?....its called no people skills which means no Leadership capability.......

I didn't say you asked those questions. I was pointing out that the right can't give him credit.

And we all know the liberal base has been angry that Obama kept trying to "reach out" to those fucking conservatives. They wanted him to fail even before he was sworn in. MM said it was the Republicans NUMBER ONE PRIORITY to get him out of office. Darrell Issa said he wanted to tie up the Obama administration with subpoenas.

You guys can't keep defending shit when the right wing has been so bold and open about what they think and what they've been doing. At this point, "rewriting" history is NOT and option. It's like Republicans saying they got 98% of everything they wanted and then blaming the downgrade on Obama.
 
Republicans didn't get jack, let alone 98% of what they wanted of anything.

Please rdean. Let's be honest here.
 
What exactly has Obama done in the nearly three years he's been president. Why would anyone call him a leader? All he did was:
Save the auto industry
Save the unions that got him elected, and he needs to be re-elected. And he did so with tax payer money.
Pass Health Care (unpopular because health care is bad)
Unpopular because socialism is not in Americas blood, to take from one to give to another is Stalinist, not the US.
Stopped a depression
What depression? You talking semantics again?
stimulated by the economy to the tune of a couple of million jobs
What jobs? we lost 2 millions jobs in the last 3 years. Created or saved is semantics....again.
ended Don't ask Don't tell
Ask the troops how that worked out, it didn't. All they did was weaken our military, ask any vet on here what the result will be, they will tell you a weakened military force. I know, I'm a vet.
shot Bin Laden in the face
Last I checked, the seals did that, which would not have happened without the Bush interrogation policies, which is why Obammie let them go on like they did.
expanded gun laws more than any other president in history
what gun laws?
sweeping change in patent laws
More communism "See the 1963 communist goals" for reason.
got rid of Qaddafi without the loss of a single American life
Violated the powers of war act, something no president has ever done.
Saved Christmas for millions of Americans whose unemployment was about to be cut off
moved tens of thousands of soldiers out of Iraq
You are a fucking moron for this one, straight up.
two female Supreme Court Justices
Both communists who hate the American constitution, here is one saying it straight up that policy is legislated from the bench, which is not true, but I bet you wouldn't understand that.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGssHxQ8FcU]Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor advocates legislating from the bench - YouTube[/ame]


Provided travel expenses to families of fallen soldiers to be on hand when the body arrives
When trying to depreciate currency, there is nothing that cannot be deemed necessary to spend money on.
Reversed the policy of barring media coverage during the return of fallen soldiers
Would you like the media filming your loved one being brought back? If you say yes, it's because you never served a day in your fucking life. This was done to numb Americans of the site of American coffins being unloaded, something we are going to have to get used to if this moron get;s elected again, the real tragedy.
Provided the Department of Veterans Affairs with more than $1.4 billion
Unless Obama makes Billions a year, it's the taxpayers that paid for that, he just appropriated it, and also...it was appropriated because it...like Obamacare ....is a failed system.
Require HC to disclose how much of the premium actually goes to patient care
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to look out for the interests of everyday Americans
Yes, god forbid when people apply for credit they actually take responsibility for their actions in making the payment on such credit. WHo would of known!?
law requiring lenders to verify applicants' credit history, income, and employment status
Cut prescription drug cost for medicare recipients by 50%
Yep, because when it comes to other peoples money, there is no credit line.
Policies that created more private sector jobs in 2010 than during entire Bush years
WHat private sector jobs? We lost over 2 Million in the last 3 years. Did you drink the koolaid again?
New START Treaty - nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia
He weakened our allies air defense, that's all that happened.
And he did the after inheriting two wars, a 10 trillion dollar deficit, an exhausted military, a trashed Justice Department, a deregulated Wall Street and a broken economy.
2 wars that he voluntarily continues to be in, he added double the deficit spending Bush did and in 1/2 the time, a justice department that he himself appointed and a wallstreet that he has lobbied for and broke the economy down 3 times what it was when he inherited it.

At the same time, fighting a political party who only goal was to destroy his presidency, who wanted him brought down, even before he was sworn in. A party that voted time and again against their own proposals and policies and against the interests of their base, in an attempt to ruin the President of the United States. A party that insisted he's not "American". That he's a Manchurian Candidate. A conspiracy. A man who did everything right, except be born white.
The only goal is to stop the outrageous spending because america can no longer afford it, but Obammie keeps pushing for billions anyways. But the left forgive them because the most retarded ones still believe in hope and change. Oh, and by the way, he's not an AMerican. He has paid millions to keep his birth records and his college transcripts secret...why? Even a retard would know something is up with that.
Do we really need to list Republican achievements during the six LOOOOONG years they held both houses, the presidency and had a majority in the Supreme Court? It's a very short list. So short I couldn't think of a single positive thing.
The small achievements during this time far outweighs the national debt accrued by the kenyan in chief anyday, at least noone tried to attack us after 9/11, how many have we had since obama took office? 4 or 5? Yeah, he is hard core on Tangos that one is.

Imagine what Obama could have done if Republicans could get past his skin color?
You're a racist piece of shit. Can you name a point in history when republicans where racist? I can name quite a few when democrats where, here we go.
1965 civil rights legislation was vetoed by none other than Al Gore senior and Robert Byrd, both Democrats, LBJ got it passed anyways. Did you know that MLK was a republican? Do you know why? Because Democrats where racists towards blacks. Hope you enjoy crow.

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
by Frances Rice
08/16/2006
114
Comments

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy​, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that ****** preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.



Why Martin Luther King Was Republican - HUMAN EVENTS

Wow, the GOP has done more for blacks then the Democrats have...who would have thought it?
 
Last edited:
What exactly has Obama done in the nearly three years he's been president.
Broadened and deepend the influence of the state in the private lives of each individual U.S. citizen--just like a Republican statist would--building upon and leveraging those exact same statist offenses against the U.S. citizenry that he ... ahem ... "inherited" from the previous administration.

Why would anyone call him a leader?
I have no idea. I would rather ask where do you think we're being led to?

All he did was:

Save the auto industry
Which arguably means he took credit for Bush's effort to save it from getting what it patently deserved.

Which, BTW, was a very Jimmy Peanut thing for Bush to do.

It's rather telling that so many of these bullshit "accomplishments" are so "bi-partisan" in retrospect yet everyone is still convinced that partisan politics means the other side is just wrong.

Pass Health Care (unpopular because health care is bad)
This is intellectually dishonest. It wasn't unpopular "because healthcare is bad," it was unpopular because it empowers greater intrusiveness into the private lives of of U.S. citizens, while offering guaranteed (and coerced) premium payments to big insurance (Wall Street) at the expense of the liberties of U.S. citizens.

The way you statist dicks gripe about the way the government subsidizes "Big Oil (TM)" and "Big Pharma" (and every other example of Big Corporate whatever) you'd think this unearned bonus to Wall Street to hedge fund traders would be the primary item you'd cite for disavowing this guy.

It's also funny how all you statist asshats think "Romneycare" is such a great thing as you throw Romney under the bus for the unemployment rate in his state--while failing to draw the patently obvious line that connects making every employee a blank check drawn on the accounts of every employer and those employers' reluctance to hire--despite the fact that the passage of "Obamacare" shares a connection to an identical national unemployement crisis for the exact same reasons.

Stopped a depression
Or prolonged it by continuing the statist practice of bailing out politically well connected criminals and incompetent enterprises, at the expense of those who pay their own bills.

Not to mention that such politically motivated bailouts (in all their forms) are the precise cause of the widening wealth-gap and the diminishment of the middle class that both retarded sides of the aisle blame the other for.

stimulated by the economy to the tune of a couple of million jobs
Bailing out the losers stimulated nothing but debt growth.

From 146407000 employed in January 2008 to 139627000 employed in August 2011 looks like over 6.7 million jobs *not* created. I suppose you could figure job losses as an indicator of effective and successful economic stimulus; I just don't know why.

The good news, I suppose, is that Obama didn't start this patently stupid economic disaster--he just went ahead and made it worse.

ended Don't ask Don't tell
Finally. I mean seriously... if was actually true that a "faggot" in the ranks would destroy the deployment effectivity of a squad of Marines (or other armed service group), I'd like those squad members identified so I could replace them with French regulars. I know those French dudes would surrender immediately, but at least they wouldn't run away out of fear that the enemy might kiss them.

shot Bin Laden in the face
Well, to be fair, he had Bin Laden shot in the face ... just like any President would ... regardless of political party.

But he does legitimately get to claim this success by the same criteria Presidents legitimize such claims.

Seriously. How long did Bush have? Look how fast Obama caught up and scored.

Too bad it's all just to legitimize the PATRIOT Act.

expanded gun laws more than any other president in history
This "accomplishment" must surely make the "disarmed and helpless electorate" lobby feel warm and cozy in their sanctimoniously morally superior regard for the safety of violent sociopaths and totalitarian hopefuls across the country.

This "accomplishment" cannot--by any means what-so-ever--be considered a good thing for anybody but those who wish to make victims of law-abiding citizens.

sweeping change in patent laws
"Sweeping" meaning changing the stupidest abuses of patent contention? Hardly.

"Sweeping" meaning make consistent in principle application with the rest of the world? Sure.

Not that doing so is really any reform as such. I can hardly believe that a voting block so staunchly opposed to advantaging "Big Corporate [Whatever]" would celebrate the capacity file first over invent first as an accomplishment.

got rid of Qaddafi without the loss of a single American life
What?

Saved Christmas for millions of Americans whose unemployment was about to be cut off
By selling the future Christmasses of everyone who deserves them while also saving Christmas for those who deserved no Christmas at all.

moved tens of thousands of soldiers out of Iraq
Yay.

As if this wasn't already going to happen. Particularly after he sent tens of thousands of soldiers in first.

two female Supreme Court Justices
This is supposed to be an accomplishment?

After all, a Republican President got a woman on the Supreme Court first.

And Republicans were responsible for putting the first Black President in office.

What do you think they were really up to when they put up McCain/Palin?

Seriously.

Provided travel expenses to families of fallen soldiers to be on hand when the body arrives
Jesus.

If you post "flosses every day" I'm likely to barf.

Reversed the policy of barring media coverage during the return of fallen soldiers
This finally is completely legit.

Provided the Department of Veterans Affairs with more than $1.4 billion
Wow. $1.4 billion to cover the $112.8 billion VA budget.

Next you'll be applauding Obama for putting his own pants on ... backwards ... over his head.

Require HC to disclose how much of the premium actually goes to patient care
So what?

Really. Not rhetorical. So what?

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to look out for the interests of everyday Americans
This ... is ... just ... LOLSOME!

I'll bet you ACTUALLY FEEL BETTER knowing that yet another government agency is looking out for you the way that all the other government agencies created to look after you should have been doing, but don't.

law requiring lenders to verify applicants' credit history, income, and employment status
How is this an accomplishment? Really? You'll just type ANYTHING in here.

This is literally a "requirement" premised upon bailing out incompetent lenders.

Cut prescription drug cost for medicare recipients by 50%
He didn't cut the prescription drug cost by 50% for those paying for the drugs though.

THAT would be an actual accomplishment.

Policies that created more private sector jobs in 2010 than during entire Bush years

BUSH: 136559000 employed in Jan. 2000; and 146407000 employed in Jan. 2008 = +9.8 million jobs.

OBAMA: 146407000 employed in Jan. 2008; and 139627000 employed in Aug. 2011 = -6.8 million jobs.

Apparently these private sector job creation policies cost the nation almost 7 million jobs.

Well, at least Obama didn't lose as many jobs as were created during the Bush administration ... I suppose that's some kind of accomplishment.

New START Treaty - nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia
What you're really saying that Obama "accomplished" is to continue with the actual accomplishment achieved by Reagan as START, which was continued by Bush as SORT, yes?

And he did the after inheriting two wars, a 10 trillion dollar deficit, an exhausted military, a trashed Justice Department, a deregulated Wall Street and a broken economy.
And he's really done very little about all that "inheritance"--except, of course that "deregulated Wall Street" business, as Wall Street is still plenty regulated enough that regulatory capture can result in the continued bailouts of politically well connected fiscal incompetence.

At the same time, fighting a political party who only goal was to destroy his presidency, who wanted him brought down, even before he was sworn in. A party that voted time and again against their own proposals and policies and against the interests of their base, in an attempt to ruin the President of the United States. A party that insisted he's not "American". That he's a Manchurian Candidate. A conspiracy.
Nonsense. The Republicans put Obama in office.

McCain is a far more reliable Democrat than Obama--OBVIOUSLY so--and Palin has all the (Vice) Presidential attractiveness of ... well ... a lipstick wearing pitbull.

Seriously. Just look at the candidate field in the Republican primaries ... shit, just look at that field of retards they're putting forward now. For Republicans who are serious about Republican policies, Obama is plenty Republican for their purposes--that's why they're fielding all these superstitious goobers. They are pandering to the frothy (yet minority) dumbasses in the religious right, while alienating everyone else with a decent sense of reason--including Conservative and Republican voters. They're doing this to a purpose--to keep Obama in office.

A man who did everything right, except be born white.
Noone from the party of Jim Crow has any business making this accusation at the party of emancipation.

Do we really need to list Republican achievements during the six LOOOOONG years they held both houses, the presidency and had a majority in the Supreme Court? It's a very short list. So short I couldn't think of a single positive thing.
That's only because you're guily of the same sin you accuse Republicans of committing.

Imagine what Obama could have done if Republicans could get past his skin color?
If we accept that Republicans actually have some problem with Obama's skin color, I'd still rather not consider the depth and breadth to which statism would be inflicted upon us in your fantasy land.
 
I have some questions for you.

  • When did Obama shoot anyone?
  • Which gun laws did Obama expand?
  • What sweeping changes were made to the patent laws?
  • How does loosing 3.3 million jobs beat Bush's atrocious record of 1.01 million jobs created?
Those are just the obvious questions after glancing at your post and its outrageous claims. I will await your answers, even though I expect you to pretend I never actually asked the questions.


OK

President Obama signs patent reform legislation | Business Law Daily

Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks

Shot in the Face, Buried at Sea - Culture - Fox Nation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

That was from Post #70 and highlights the real problem.

And the reply from the person asking the question?

I asked specifically about your claim that the changes were sweeping.
That patent reform law was far from sweeping.

In other words, he signed it in spite of, not because of, the gun laws. It certainly does not count as having "expanded gun laws more than any other president in history."

Now we get back to pointing out the obvious, even if bin Laden was shot in the face, Obama did not shoot him.


See? No matter what Obama does, it doesn't count.

And especially, about Bin Laden. Obama shot Bin Laden in the face. He didn't use a gun, he used a US Military Ranger carrying a gun. Even more deadly.

It's the skin color. Obama didn't create the "divide". Republican racism did and the more honest will not only admit it, but proudly announce it. We all know that to be true. Not something that can be denied.

Carrying concealed and loaded weapons into a national park nothing? Yea, nothing. Hilarious.
where did i question those questions?.....i think you got the wrong poster .....now answer my question from post 79......remember the divide started under Bush....a white guy.....not Obama.....it's gotten a lot worse under him....and when our exalted "Leader" says the things he says about the other half of the Country....it just makes that divide grow.....but then,you are like that too.....so to you to have this Country fragment is no doubt is what you and your FAR Left buddies want....he is no leader Dean....Clinton our 1st black President brought people together.....whats this guys problem?....its called no people skills which means no Leadership capability.......

I didn't say you asked those questions. I was pointing out that the right can't give him credit.

And we all know the liberal base has been angry that Obama kept trying to "reach out" to those fucking conservatives. They wanted him to fail even before he was sworn in. MM said it was the Republicans NUMBER ONE PRIORITY to get him out of office. Darrell Issa said he wanted to tie up the Obama administration with subpoenas.

You guys can't keep defending shit when the right wing has been so bold and open about what they think and what they've been doing. At this point, "rewriting" history is NOT and option. It's like Republicans saying they got 98% of everything they wanted and then blaming the downgrade on Obama.

geezus your a good Dancer Dean....my biggest beef with Obama Dean is he is a shitty leader....and i gave him 2 years before i started giving the guy shit......if a Black Man named Colin Powell was President this Country would not be so far apart because he has actually had to deal with people in his life,many different kinds of People,people who dont like him and those who like the guy ......but he isnt like Obama who will insult 50% of the Country and then want them to back his policies.....the guy is the President of everyone in this Country Dean not just the Left,whether he or you like it or not.....and maybe the fucker should start acting like it.....you earn the respect of the people.....something this guy does not understand.....i work with a lot of Democrats Dean who voted for this man....many of them think now that he is in over his head....and they now hope a better qualified person is put forth by the Democrats to run.....Obama should look at this as a learning experience and step down and let someone more qualified run in 2012,maybe in ten years time the guy will have what it takes to run this Country......but he sure aint there now....
 
What exactly has Obama done in the nearly three years he's been president.
Broadened and deepend the influence of the state in the private lives of each individual U.S. citizen--just like a Republican statist would--building upon and leveraging those exact same statist offenses against the U.S. citizenry that he ... ahem ... "inherited" from the previous administration.

Why would anyone call him a leader?
I have no idea. I would rather ask where do you think we're being led to?

Which arguably means he took credit for Bush's effort to save it from getting what it patently deserved.

Which, BTW, was a very Jimmy Peanut thing for Bush to do.

It's rather telling that so many of these bullshit "accomplishments" are so "bi-partisan" in retrospect yet everyone is still convinced that partisan politics means the other side is just wrong.

This is intellectually dishonest. It wasn't unpopular "because healthcare is bad," it was unpopular because it empowers greater intrusiveness into the private lives of of U.S. citizens, while offering guaranteed (and coerced) premium payments to big insurance (Wall Street) at the expense of the liberties of U.S. citizens.

The way you statist dicks gripe about the way the government subsidizes "Big Oil (TM)" and "Big Pharma" (and every other example of Big Corporate whatever) you'd think this unearned bonus to Wall Street to hedge fund traders would be the primary item you'd cite for disavowing this guy.

It's also funny how all you statist asshats think "Romneycare" is such a great thing as you throw Romney under the bus for the unemployment rate in his state--while failing to draw the patently obvious line that connects making every employee a blank check drawn on the accounts of every employer and those employers' reluctance to hire--despite the fact that the passage of "Obamacare" shares a connection to an identical national unemployement crisis for the exact same reasons.

Or prolonged it by continuing the statist practice of bailing out politically well connected criminals and incompetent enterprises, at the expense of those who pay their own bills.

Not to mention that such politically motivated bailouts (in all their forms) are the precise cause of the widening wealth-gap and the diminishment of the middle class that both retarded sides of the aisle blame the other for.

Bailing out the losers stimulated nothing but debt growth.

From 146407000 employed in January 2008 to 139627000 employed in August 2011 looks like over 6.7 million jobs *not* created. I suppose you could figure job losses as an indicator of effective and successful economic stimulus; I just don't know why.

The good news, I suppose, is that Obama didn't start this patently stupid economic disaster--he just went ahead and made it worse.

Finally. I mean seriously... if was actually true that a "faggot" in the ranks would destroy the deployment effectivity of a squad of Marines (or other armed service group), I'd like those squad members identified so I could replace them with French regulars. I know those French dudes would surrender immediately, but at least they wouldn't run away out of fear that the enemy might kiss them.

Well, to be fair, he had Bin Laden shot in the face ... just like any President would ... regardless of political party.

But he does legitimately get to claim this success by the same criteria Presidents legitimize such claims.

Seriously. How long did Bush have? Look how fast Obama caught up and scored.

Too bad it's all just to legitimize the PATRIOT Act.

This "accomplishment" must surely make the "disarmed and helpless electorate" lobby feel warm and cozy in their sanctimoniously morally superior regard for the safety of violent sociopaths and totalitarian hopefuls across the country.

This "accomplishment" cannot--by any means what-so-ever--be considered a good thing for anybody but those who wish to make victims of law-abiding citizens.

"Sweeping" meaning changing the stupidest abuses of patent contention? Hardly.

"Sweeping" meaning make consistent in principle application with the rest of the world? Sure.

Not that doing so is really any reform as such. I can hardly believe that a voting block so staunchly opposed to advantaging "Big Corporate [Whatever]" would celebrate the capacity file first over invent first as an accomplishment.

What?

By selling the future Christmasses of everyone who deserves them while also saving Christmas for those who deserved no Christmas at all.

Yay.

As if this wasn't already going to happen. Particularly after he sent tens of thousands of soldiers in first.

This is supposed to be an accomplishment?

After all, a Republican President got a woman on the Supreme Court first.

And Republicans were responsible for putting the first Black President in office.

What do you think they were really up to when they put up McCain/Palin?

Seriously.

Jesus.

If you post "flosses every day" I'm likely to barf.

This finally is completely legit.

Wow. $1.4 billion to cover the $112.8 billion VA budget.

Next you'll be applauding Obama for putting his own pants on ... backwards ... over his head.

So what?

Really. Not rhetorical. So what?

This ... is ... just ... LOLSOME!

I'll bet you ACTUALLY FEEL BETTER knowing that yet another government agency is looking out for you the way that all the other government agencies created to look after you should have been doing, but don't.

How is this an accomplishment? Really? You'll just type ANYTHING in here.

This is literally a "requirement" premised upon bailing out incompetent lenders.

He didn't cut the prescription drug cost by 50% for those paying for the drugs though.

THAT would be an actual accomplishment.



BUSH: 136559000 employed in Jan. 2000; and 146407000 employed in Jan. 2008 = +9.8 million jobs.

OBAMA: 146407000 employed in Jan. 2008; and 139627000 employed in Aug. 2011 = -6.8 million jobs.

Apparently these private sector job creation policies cost the nation almost 7 million jobs.

Well, at least Obama didn't lose as many jobs as were created during the Bush administration ... I suppose that's some kind of accomplishment.

What you're really saying that Obama "accomplished" is to continue with the actual accomplishment achieved by Reagan as START, which was continued by Bush as SORT, yes?

And he's really done very little about all that "inheritance"--except, of course that "deregulated Wall Street" business, as Wall Street is still plenty regulated enough that regulatory capture can result in the continued bailouts of politically well connected fiscal incompetence.

Nonsense. The Republicans put Obama in office.

McCain is a far more reliable Democrat than Obama--OBVIOUSLY so--and Palin has all the (Vice) Presidential attractiveness of ... well ... a lipstick wearing pitbull.

Seriously. Just look at the candidate field in the Republican primaries ... shit, just look at that field of retards they're putting forward now. For Republicans who are serious about Republican policies, Obama is plenty Republican for their purposes--that's why they're fielding all these superstitious goobers. They are pandering to the frothy (yet minority) dumbasses in the religious right, while alienating everyone else with a decent sense of reason--including Conservative and Republican voters. They're doing this to a purpose--to keep Obama in office.

Noone from the party of Jim Crow has any business making this accusation at the party of emancipation.

Do we really need to list Republican achievements during the six LOOOOONG years they held both houses, the presidency and had a majority in the Supreme Court? It's a very short list. So short I couldn't think of a single positive thing.
That's only because you're guily of the same sin you accuse Republicans of committing.

Imagine what Obama could have done if Republicans could get past his skin color?
If we accept that Republicans actually have some problem with Obama's skin color, I'd still rather not consider the depth and breadth to which statism would be inflicted upon us in your fantasy land.

Well, what d'ya know. Black actually is white and up is down in the R world.
 
Republicans didn't get jack, let alone 98% of what they wanted of anything.

Please rdean. Let's be honest here.

Boehner: I got 98 percent of what I wanted - CBS News

Tell it to John Beohner.

Funny, since you got 98% of what Republicans wanted and you think what you got wasn't enough, what is it Republicans should have gotten. Their failed policies caused the downgrade. What is it Republicans should have done different? :popcorn:
 
We were in the toilet when he because President and he hurried to pull the handle and flush us down the drain. Worst President ever in my humble opinion.
 
Republicans didn't get jack, let alone 98% of what they wanted of anything.

Please rdean. Let's be honest here.

Boehner: I got 98 percent of what I wanted - CBS News

Tell it to John Beohner.

Funny, since you got 98% of what Republicans wanted and you think what you got wasn't enough, what is it Republicans should have gotten. Their failed policies caused the downgrade. What is it Republicans should have done different? :popcorn:

is it your claim the dems and obama only got 2% of what they wanted?
 

Forum List

Back
Top