Harvard now is pro-criminal/pro-thug/''American'' values

[harmonica]

You mean the same police department that was found by a Department of Justice investigation to be blatantly racist?

...please provide evidence they were/are racist...please provide the specific details of the cases
..you can't though--

I can do better than that. 105 pages of the report from the Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/defau...5/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf

Try to find someone to sound out the big words. You know the ones you have trouble with, those with more than two syllables.

this is a REPORT--------not PROOF---not a COURT case where the defendant can defend himself
hahahahahhahahahahahah
they can write anything they want in that report:
the Eiffel Tower can fly/move
rabbits seem to like windows
--all kind of CRAP

they don't have any of the police statements !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just the people arrested---and they don't even have their quotes !!!
that's why I asked for SPECIFIC details
this is report is just like a headline:
like --white cop shoots unarmed black man--that's all the details in the report--you don't have the cops's story of how the black man ATTACKED the cop
NO proof

Yeah. A trial was not held. True. Because the Government of Ferguson agreed with everything in the investigation.

Justice Department and City of Ferguson, Missouri, Resolve Lawsuit with Agreement to Reform Ferguson Police Department and Municipal Court to Ensure Constitutional Policing

Let’s see if we can explain this simply enough for you. Let’s say you were driving while drunk. You smash into a car. The people in that car sue. You settle and agree to pay because you were drunk, and there is no doubt you did it.

The same is true in Ferguson. That is why there was no trial. Like you in the scenario above, there was no doubt they were doing it. There was no doubt they were wrong. In fact. They invited the DOJ to investigate.

Dumbass.

so a black man files a claim of harassment
some blacks get ticketed for breaking the law
and this shows racism/harassment/etc??
this is your proof???!!! hahahahahaha
good thing you are not a lawyer

 

[SavannahMann]

You mean the same police department that was found by a Department of Justice investigation to be blatantly racist?

...please provide evidence they were/are racist...please provide the specific details of the cases
..you can't though--

I can do better than that. 105 pages of the report from the Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/defau...5/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf

Try to find someone to sound out the big words. You know the ones you have trouble with, those with more than two syllables.

this is a REPORT--------not PROOF---not a COURT case where the defendant can defend himself
hahahahahhahahahahahah
they can write anything they want in that report:
the Eiffel Tower can fly/move
rabbits seem to like windows
--all kind of CRAP

they don't have any of the police statements !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just the people arrested---and they don't even have their quotes !!!
that's why I asked for SPECIFIC details
this is report is just like a headline:
like --white cop shoots unarmed black man--that's all the details in the report--you don't have the cops's story of how the black man ATTACKED the cop
NO proof

Yeah. A trial was not held. True. Because the Government of Ferguson agreed with everything in the investigation.

Justice Department and City of Ferguson, Missouri, Resolve Lawsuit with Agreement to Reform Ferguson Police Department and Municipal Court to Ensure Constitutional Policing

Let’s see if we can explain this simply enough for you. Let’s say you were driving while drunk. You smash into a car. The people in that car sue. You settle and agree to pay because you were drunk, and there is no doubt you did it.

The same is true in Ferguson. That is why there was no trial. Like you in the scenario above, there was no doubt they were doing it. There was no doubt they were wrong. In fact. They invited the DOJ to investigate.

Dumbass.

so a black man files a claim of harassment
some blacks get ticketed for breaking the law
and this shows racism/harassment/etc??
this is your proof???!!! hahahahahaha
good thing you are not a lawyer

Yeah. But when the Government of Ferguson agree that their police and courts were in fact racist, what do we have left to argue about? I’m just curious why you stand defiantly on the side that nobody argued, insisting the factual findings that were agreed to by both parties involved, were somehow wrong?

 

[harmonica]

...please provide evidence they were/are racist...please provide the specific details of the cases
..you can't though--

I can do better than that. 105 pages of the report from the Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/defau...5/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf

Try to find someone to sound out the big words. You know the ones you have trouble with, those with more than two syllables.

this is a REPORT--------not PROOF---not a COURT case where the defendant can defend himself
hahahahahhahahahahahah
they can write anything they want in that report:
the Eiffel Tower can fly/move
rabbits seem to like windows
--all kind of CRAP

they don't have any of the police statements !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just the people arrested---and they don't even have their quotes !!!
that's why I asked for SPECIFIC details
this is report is just like a headline:
like --white cop shoots unarmed black man--that's all the details in the report--you don't have the cops's story of how the black man ATTACKED the cop
NO proof

Yeah. A trial was not held. True. Because the Government of Ferguson agreed with everything in the investigation.

Justice Department and City of Ferguson, Missouri, Resolve Lawsuit with Agreement to Reform Ferguson Police Department and Municipal Court to Ensure Constitutional Policing

Let’s see if we can explain this simply enough for you. Let’s say you were driving while drunk. You smash into a car. The people in that car sue. You settle and agree to pay because you were drunk, and there is no doubt you did it.

The same is true in Ferguson. That is why there was no trial. Like you in the scenario above, there was no doubt they were doing it. There was no doubt they were wrong. In fact. They invited the DOJ to investigate.

Dumbass.

so a black man files a claim of harassment
some blacks get ticketed for breaking the law
and this shows racism/harassment/etc??
this is your proof???!!! hahahahahaha
good thing you are not a lawyer

Yeah. But when the Government of Ferguson agree that their police and courts were in fact racist, what do we have left to argue about? I’m just curious why you stand defiantly on the side that nobody argued, insisting the factual findings that were agreed to by both parties involved, were somehow wrong?

easy--$$$$$$$$
..and the council initially voted against it--further proof that they are not admitting--it is not a court of law ....
In a reversal, Ferguson City Council agrees to reforms and federal oversight
this is the council voting to go ahead with reforms--

the BIG ''racist'' problem that initiated this was the MBrown case!!!
a black --who stole--attacked a clerk--then attacked a white cop who shot him!!--this is YOUR racism!!???!! hahahahahahah
..blacks committing a crime and getting arrested/ticketed---this is YOUR racism??!!
..no--no the council vote doesn't prove crap

that's why I asked for proof/details--there is no proof of racism/harassment of blacks BECAUSE of their skin color --none at all

 

[jillian]

Have you seen the film?

don't be ridiculous